Decreased neonatal morbidity in 'stomach-down' left congenital diaphragmatic hernia: implications of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis for counseling and postnatal management.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of stomach position on postnatal outcome in cases of left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) without liver herniation, diagnosed and characterized on prenatal ultrasound (US), by comparing those with ('stomach-up' CDH) to those without ('stomach-down' CDH) intrathoracic stomach herniation. METHODS: Infants with left CDH who underwent prenatal US and postnatal repair at our institution between January 2008 and March 2017 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Detailed prenatal US examinations, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, operative reports and medical records of infants enrolled in the pulmonary hypoplasia program at our institution were reviewed. Cases with liver herniation and those with an additional anomaly were excluded. Cases in which bowel loops were identified within the fetal chest on US while the stomach was intra-abdominal were categorized as having stomach-down CDH. Cases in which bowel loops and the stomach were visualized within the fetal chest on US were categorized as having stomach-up CDH. Prenatal imaging findings and postnatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 152 patients with left CDH were initially eligible for inclusion. Seventy-eight patients had surgically confirmed liver herniation and were excluded. Of the 74 included CDH cases without liver herniation, 28 (37.8%) had stomach-down CDH and 46 (62.2%) had stomach-up CDH. Of the 28 stomach-down CDH cases, 10 (35.7%) were referred for a suspected lung lesion. Sixty-eight (91.9%) cases had postnatal outcome data available for analysis. There was no significant difference in median observed-to-expected (o/e) lung-area-to-head-circumference ratio (LHR) between cases with stomach-down CDH and those with stomach-up CDH (41.5% vs 38.4%; P = 0.41). Furthermore, there was no difference in median MRI o/e total lung volume (TLV) between the two groups (49.5% vs 44.0%; P = 0.22). Compared with stomach-up CDH patients, stomach-down CDH patients demonstrated lower median duration of intubation (18 days vs 9.5 days; P < 0.01), median duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (495 h vs 223.5 h; P < 0.05), rate of supplemental oxygen requirement at 30 days of age (20/42 (47.6%) vs 3/26 (11.5%); P < 0.01) and rate of pulmonary hypertension at initial postnatal echocardiography (28/42 (66.7%) vs 9/26 (34.6%); P = 0.01). No neonatal death occurred in stomach-down CDH patients and one neonatal death was seen in a patient with intrathoracic stomach herniation. CONCLUSIONS: In infants with left CDH without liver herniation, despite similar o/e-LHR and o/e-TLV, those with stomach-down CDH have decreased neonatal morbidity compared to those with stomach herniation. Progressive or variable physiological distension of the stomach over the course of gestation may explain these findings. Stomach-down left CDH is mistaken for a lung mass in a substantial proportion of cases. Accurate prenatal US characterization of CDH is crucial for appropriate prenatal counseling and patient management. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

An evaluation of adverse incident reporting.

To examine the reliability of adverse incident-reporting systems we carried out a retrospective review of the mother and baby case notes from a series of 250 deliveries in each of two London obstetric units. Notes were screened for the presence of adverse incidents defined by lists of incidents to be reported in accordance with unit protocols. We assessed the percentage of adverse incidents reported by staff to the maternity risk manager at each unit; the percentage of incidents detected by each risk manager, but not reported; and the percentage of incidents identified only by retrospective case note review. A total of 196 adverse incidents was identified from the 500 deliveries. Staff reported 23% of these and the risk managers identified a further 22%. The remaining 55% of incidents were identified only by retrospective case-note review and not known to the risk manager. Staff reported about half the serious incidents (48%), but comparatively few of the moderately serious (24%) or minor ones (15%). The risk managers identified an additional 16% of serious incidents that staff did not report. Drug errors were analysed separately; only two were known to the risk managers and a further 44 were found by case-note review. Incident-reporting systems may produce much potentially valuable information, but seriously underestimate the true level of reportable incidents. Where one risk manager covers an entire trust, rather than a single unit, reporting rates are likely to be very much lower than in the present study. Greater clarity is needed regarding the definition of reportable incidents (including drug errors). Staff should receive continuing education about the purposes and aims of clinical risk management and incident reporting and consideration should be given to designating specific members of staff with responsibility for reporting.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: its impact on national health economics.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether sound economic reasons exist for the wider introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Australia. DESIGN: A retrospective survey of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We compared time of hospital stay and time off work after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with data for open cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Seventeen participating surgeons in four Australian States allowed access to patients treated between May 1990 and November 1991 (1254 patients in all). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient acceptability of the procedure, average length of postoperative in-hospital stay, and the savings associated with earlier return to work compared with open cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Almost 90% of patients (1127) replied and 1088 responses were considered appropriate for analysis. Serious complications were rare; 96% of patients thought the technique was successful. The mean length of in-hospital stay was 2.6 days (range, 1-120), compared with a mean of 8.7 days for open cholecystectomy. Among working patients, the mean time to return to work was 11.6 days (range, 10.7-13.1), an estimated 27 days sooner than after open cholecystectomy. Extrapolating from these results, replacing 95% of open cholecystectomies with laparoscopic procedures would have 133,285 hospital bed-days and 500,000 work-days each year. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective. Its wider use in Australia would result in savings to both the individual and the national economy.