Assessment of the Performance of Non-invasive Criteria for the Evaluation of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients with Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Assessment of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) non-invasively using a combination of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and platelet counts is proposed as an alternative to hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) estimation. Utility of these criteria in compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) patients of different etiologies including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with BMI  >  30 kg/m2 was studied in a large cohort. METHODS: Consecutive patients of cACLD with available anthropometric and laboratory details, LSM, and HVPG were included in a retrospective analysis. A LSM of ≥ 25 kPa alone and LSM ≤ 15 kPa plus platelets ≥ 150 × 109/L were evaluated as non-invasive rule-in and rule-out criteria for CSPH, respectively. The NASH-ANTICPATE model (composite of BMI, platelets, and LSM) was evaluated in patients with obese NASH. RESULTS: Patients with cACLD (n = 626) (mean age: 50.8 ± 12.4 years, 74.2% males) with alcohol (ALD, 30.3%), NASH (26.4%), hepatitis C (HCV, 16.6%), hepatitis B (HBV,10.2%) etiology were included. The prevalence of CSPH was  >  80% across all etiologies except in HBV (62.5%) and in obese non-NASH (71-72%). The rule-in criteria had a PPV  >  90% for all etiologies except in HBV (80.8%). The rule-out criteria had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 65%, 53%, and 40% in ALD, HCV, and NASH, respectively. The NASH-ANTCIPATE model had specificity of 100% and NPV of 33% to detect CSPH in obese NASH (n = 62). CONCLUSIONS: LSM ≥ 25 kPa predicted CSPH in most etiologies except HBV. A significant proportion of patients have CSPH despite satisfying the rule-out criteria. The NASH-ANTICIPATE model is specific but fails to exclude CSPH in nearly two-third patients with obesity and NASH. There is a need for precise disease-specific non-invasive models for detecting CSPH.

Liver stiffness assessment as an alternative to hepatic venous pressure gradient for predicting rebleed after acute variceal bleed: A proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), although an important determinant in predicting rebleeding after an episode of acute variceal bleed (AVB), is seldom utilized in clinical practice. We aimed to study the role of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) after variceal bleeding as a potential noninvasive predictor of rebleed. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of clinical trial of patients undergoing HVPG (postbleed HVPG) and LSM (postbleed LSM) assessment within 3-5 days of index AVB. HVPG response was assessed after 4 weeks of pharmacotherapy. Comparative assessment of long-term rebleeding rates stratified using postbleed LSM, postbleed HVPG, and HVPG response was performed. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to identify the most appropriate tool for routine use. RESULTS: Long-term clinical and HVPG response data were available for 48 patients post-AVB, of whom 45 patients had valid postbleed LSM. Rebleeding occurred in 13 (28%) patients over a median follow-up of 4 years with no early rebleeds. Postbleed LSM >30 kPa and baseline HVPG >15 mm Hg were optimal cutoffs for identifying patients at high risk of rebleeding. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and competing risk analysis accounting for death showed similar discriminative values for all three stratification tools. At usual risk thresholds, HVPG response had maximum benefit on DCA followed by postbleed LSM. On DCA, 50-60 additional HVPGs were required to detect one additional patient at high risk of rebleed. CONCLUSION: Liver stiffness measurement during AVB can potentially be used as an alternative to portal pressure indices in decompensated cirrhosis to identify those at high risk of late-onset rebleed.

Bariatric Surgery in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Impact Assessment Using Paired Liver Biopsy and Fibroscan.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is associated with a positive impact on the degree of hepatic steatosis and inflammation in nonalcoholic associated fatty liver disease (NAFLD), although its effect on fibrosis is contentious. The role of Fibroscan in the post-bariatric assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This work aims to study the impact of bariatric surgery on the course of NAFLD using both invasive (liver biopsy) and non-invasive tests (biochemical parameters and Fibroscan). METHODS: In this prospective study, the impact of bariatric surgery on the course of NAFLD was assessed using paired liver biopsy (intra-operative and post-bariatric surgery 1-year follow-up). The liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) cutoffs for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis, respectively, were calculated in both pre- and post-bariatric settings. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (70.7% females, mean age 39.2 years) underwent paired liver biopsy. Post-bariatric surgery 1-year liver biopsy showed significant improvement in all the histopathological parameters of NAFLD. The mean NAFLD Activity Score declined from 2.81 (± 1.08) to 1.31 (± 1.39) post-bariatric surgery. Thirty (51.7%) patients showed improvement in fibrosis, eighteen (31%) no change, and ten (17.2%) had worsening. Worsening of fibrosis was associated with a higher median age of 44.5 versus 38 years (p value = 0.033). The CAP cutoff values for the various stages of hepatic steatosis were higher pre-operatively as compared with those obtained post-bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery is associated with significant improvement in histopathological parameters of NAFLD. Fibroscan shows good diagnostic accuracy in detecting advanced stage and grade of NAFLD.