Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi.

Background and purpose - In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effectiveness analyses have yet compared IMN and ST in Malawi. We report the results of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) comparing treatment using either IMN or ST.Patients and methods - This was an economic evaluation study, where a CUA was done using a decision-tree model from the government healthcare payer and societal perspectives with an 1-year time horizon. We obtained EQ-5D-3L utility scores and probabilities from a prospective observational study assessing quality of life and function in 187 adult patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or ST. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility scores using the area under the curve method. Direct treatment costs were obtained from a prospective micro costing study. Indirect costs included patient lost productivity, patient transportation, meals, and childcare costs associated with hospital stay and follow-up visits. Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty.Results - Total treatment costs were higher for ST ($1,349) compared with IMN ($1,122). QALYs were lower for ST than IMN, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.76) and 0.77 (CI 0.71-0.82) respectively. Based on lower cost and higher utility, IMN was the dominant strategy. IMN remained dominant in 94% of simulations. IMN would be less cost-effective than ST at a total procedure cost exceeding $880 from the payer's perspective, or $1,035 from the societal perspective.Interpretation - IMN was cost saving and more effective than ST in the treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures in Malawi, and may be an efficient use of limited healthcare resources.

Improving Management of Adult Ankle Fractures in Malawi: An Assessment of Providers' Knowledge and Treatment Strategies.

BACKGROUND: The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is increasing worldwide, especially in low-income countries such as Malawi. Ankle fractures are common in Malawi and may receive suboptimal treatment due to inadequate surgical capacity and limited provider knowledge of evidence-based treatment guidelines. METHODS: This study was conducted in 3 phases. First, we assessed Malawian orthopaedic providers' understanding of anatomy, injury identification, and treatment methods. Second, we observed Malawian providers' treatment strategies for adults with ankle fractures presenting to a central hospital. These patients' radiographs underwent blinded, post hoc review by 3 U.S.-based orthopaedic surgeons and a Malawian orthopaedic surgeon, whose treatment recommendations were compared with actual treatments rendered by Malawian providers. Third, an educational course addressing knowledge deficits was implemented. We assessed post-course knowledge and introduced a standardized management protocol, specific to the Malawian context. RESULTS: In Phase 1, deficits in injury identification, ideal treatment practices, and treatment standardization were identified. In Phase 2, 17 (35%) of 49 patients met operative criteria but did not undergo a surgical procedure, mainly because of resource limitations and provider failure to recognize unstable injuries. In Phase 3, 51 (84%) of 61 participants improved their overall performance between the pre-course and post-course assessments. Participants answered a mean of 32.4 (66%) of 49 questions correctly pre-course and 37.7 (77%) of 49 questions correctly post-course, a significant improvement of 5.2 more questions (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8 to 6.6 questions; p < 0.001) answered correctly. Providers were able to identify 1 more injury correctly of 8 injuries (mean, 1.1 questions [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.6 questions]; p < 0.001) and to identify 1 more ideal treatment of the 7 that were tested (mean, 1.0 question [95% CI, 0.5 to 1.4 questions]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adult ankle fractures in Malawi were predominantly treated nonoperatively despite often meeting evidence-based criteria for surgery. This was due to resource limitations, knowledge deficits, and lack of treatment standardization. We demonstrated a comprehensive approach to examining the challenges of providing adequate orthopaedic care in a resource-limited setting and the successful implementation of an educational intervention to improve care delivery. This approach can be adapted for other conditions to improve orthopaedic care in low-resource settings.

Outcomes Measurement in Global Hand Surgery.

The global burden of musculoskeletal trauma is high. There is a need to improve access to safe, high-quality surgery in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Numerous initiatives have taken aim at solving this underlying shortage in surgical care, including mission trips, academic programs, and international collaborations. However, much work remains to be done in LMICs compared with high-income countries (HICs). In HICs, the field of hand surgery has grown partially owing to the rigorous application of clinical research to examine outcomes and determine best practices. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have a key role as a valid patient-centered method of capturing symptoms and well-being. They have substantial promise in LMICs to understand patient symptom severity and quality of life better, monitor treatment success or failure, determine cost-effectiveness of procedures, and guide capacity building. Contextually appropriate PROMs can improve routine follow-up in LMICs and advance the practice and study of hand surgery worldwide.

Assessing the capacity of Malawi's district and central hospitals to manage traumatic diaphyseal femoral fractures in adults.

BACKGROUND: The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is growing worldwide, disproportionately affecting low-income countries like Malawi. However, resources required to manage musculoskeletal trauma remain inadequate. A detailed understanding of the current capacity of Malawian public hospitals to manage musculoskeletal trauma is unknown and necessary for effective trauma system development planning. METHODS: We developed a list of infrastructure, manpower, and material resources used during treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures-a representative injury managed non-operatively and operatively in Malawi. We identified, by consensus of at least 7 out of 10 experts, which items were essential at district and central hospitals. We surveyed orthopaedic providers in person at all 25 district and 4 central hospitals in Malawi on the presence, availability, and reasons for unavailability of essential resources. We validated survey responses by performing simultaneous independent on-site assessments of 25% of the hospitals. RESULTS: No district or central hospital in Malawi had available all the essential resources to adequately manage femoral fractures. On average, district hospitals had 71% (range 41-90%) of essential resources, with at least 15 of 25 reporting unavailability of inpatient ward nurses, x-ray, external fixators, gauze and bandages, and walking assistive devices. District hospitals offered only non-operative treatment, though 24/25 reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Central hospitals reported an average of 76% (71-85%) of essential resources, with at least 2 of 4 hospitals reporting unavailability of full blood count, inpatient hospital beds, a procedure room, an operating room, casualty/A&E department clinicians, orthopaedic clinicians, a circulating nurse, inpatient ward nurses, electrocardiograms, x-ray, suture, and walking assistive devices. All four central hospitals reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Operative treatment of femur fracture with a reliable supply of implants was available at 3/4 hospitals, though 2/3 were dependent entirely on foreign donations. CONCLUSION: We identified critical deficiencies in infrastructure, manpower, and essential resources at district and central hospitals in Malawi. Our findings provide evidence-based guidance on how to improve the musculoskeletal trauma system in Malawi, by identifying where and why essential resources were unavailable when needed.

Understanding and Addressing the Global Need for Orthopaedic Trauma Care.

➤The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is high worldwide, disproportionately affecting the poor, who have the least access to quality orthopaedic trauma care.➤Orthopaedic trauma care is essential, and must be a priority in the horizontal development of global health systems.➤The education of surgeons, nonphysician clinicians, and ancillary staff in low and middle income countries is central to improving access to and quality of care.➤Volunteer surgical missions from rich countries can sustainably expand and strengthen orthopaedic trauma care only when they serve a local need and build local capacity.➤Innovative business models may help to pay for care of the poor. Examples include reducing costs through process improvements and cross-subsidizing from profitable high-volume activities.➤Resource-poor settings may foster innovations in devices or systems with universal applicability in orthopaedics.

Health and economic benefits of improved injury prevention and trauma care worldwide.

OBJECTIVES: Injury is a significant source of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and often disproportionately affects younger, more productive members of society. While many have made the case for improved injury prevention and trauma care, health system development in low- and middle-income countries is often limited by resources. This study aims to determine the economic benefit of improved injury prevention and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: This study uses existing data on injury mortality worldwide from the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study to estimate the number of lives that could be saved if injury mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries could be reduced to rates in high-income countries. Using economic modeling--through the human capital approach and the value of a statistical life approach--the study then demonstrates the associated economic benefit of these lives saved. RESULTS: 88 percent of injury-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. If injury mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries were reduced to rates in high-income countries, 2,117,500 lives could be saved per year. This would result in between 49 million and 52 million disability adjusted life years averted per year, with discounting and age weighting. Using the human capital approach, the associated economic benefit of reducing mortality rates ranges from $245 to $261 billion with discounting and age weighting. Using the value of a statistical life approach, the benefit is between 758 and 786 billion dollars per year. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing injury mortality in low- and middle-income countries could save over 2 million lives per year and provide significant economic benefit globally. Further investments in trauma care and injury prevention are needed.