Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Ann Epidemiol ; 35: 53-58, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31085069

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Correlated healthcare utilization outcomes may be encoded as binary outcomes in epidemiologic studies. We demonstrate how to account for correlation between concurrent binary outcomes and confounding by person characteristics when estimating a treatment effect in observational studies. METHODS: We present a joint shared-parameter model, weighted by inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) to account for confounding. The model is evaluated in a simulation study that emulates the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data and compared with a covariate-adjusted joint model and with separate outcome models (IPTW weighted and covariate adjusted). RESULTS: For the IPTW-weighted joint model, relative bias in the estimated treatment effect on outcome 1 ranged from -0.057 to -0.033 and outcome 2 from -0.077 to -0.043. For the covariate-adjusted joint model, relative bias ranged from -0.010 to -0.083 for outcome 1 and from -0.087 to -0.110 for outcome 2. The covariate-adjusted joint model estimated the effect more closely than the covariate-adjusted separate model. The IPTW-weighted joint model estimated the effect more closely for outcome 1. CONCLUSIONS: The IPTW-weighted joint model handles correlation between binary outcomes, adjusts for confounding, and estimates the treatment effect accurately in observational studies. We illustrate the contribution of person-specific effects in estimating personalized risk.


Assuntos
Modelos Estatísticos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Método de Monte Carlo , Probabilidade , Pontuação de Propensão , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28223792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior work suggests that asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) has a greater health burden than asthma alone or COPD alone. In the current study, we have further evaluated the health burden of ACOS in a nationally representative sample of the US population, focusing on patient-reported outcomes and health care utilization and on comparisons with asthma alone and COPD alone. Patient-reported outcomes are especially meaningful, as these include functional activities that are highly valued by patients and are the basis for patient-centered care. METHODS: Using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we evaluated patient-reported outcomes and health care utilization among participants who were aged 40-85 years and had self-reported, physician-diagnosed asthma or COPD. MEPS administered five rounds of interviews, at baseline and approximately every 6 months over 2.5 years. Patient-reported outcomes included activities of daily living (ADLs), mobility, social/recreational activities, disability days in bed, and health status (Short Form 12, Version 2). Health care utilization included outpatient and emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 3,486 participants with asthma or COPD, 1,585 (45.4%) had asthma alone, 1,294 (37.1%) had COPD alone, and 607 (17.4%) had ACOS. Relative to asthma alone, ACOS was significantly associated with higher odds of prevalent disability in ADLs and limitations in mobility and social/recreational activities (adjusted odds ratios [adjORs]: 1.91-3.98), as well as with higher odds of incident limitations in mobility and social/recreational activities, disability days in bed, and respiratory-based outpatient and ED visits, and hospitalization (adjORs: 1.86-2.35). In addition, ACOS had significantly worse physical and mental health scores than asthma alone (P-values <0.0001). Relative to COPD alone, ACOS was significantly associated with higher odds of prevalent limitations in mobility and social/recreational activities (adjORs: 1.68-2.06), as well as with higher odds of incident disability days in bed and respiratory-based outpatient and ED visits (adjORs: 1.48-1.74). In addition, ACOS had a significantly worse physical health score, but similar mental health score, as compared with COPD alone (P-values 0.0025 and 0.1578, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the US, ACOS is associated with a greater health burden, including patient-reported outcomes and health care utilization, relative to asthma alone and COPD alone.


Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/economia , Asma/fisiopatologia , Repouso em Cama , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Avaliação da Deficiência , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/economia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Nível de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Limitação da Mobilidade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/economia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Social , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA