Contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of complex cystic lesions in renal transplant recipients with acquired cystic kidney disease: preliminary experience.

We prospectively studied the potential value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to characterize complex acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) or suspected solid renal masses, avoiding the risk of inducing acute kidney injury in 138 renal transplant recipients by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Forty-three cases (31%) had ACKD; 15 ACKD patients (35%) showed suspicious or nondiagnostic ultrasound. The latter subgroup underwent CEUS and, if the suspicion was confirmed, a contrast-enhanced CT. Thirty five lesions were identified in the 15 patients studied by CEUS. According to the Bosniak classification, 27 cysts were type I (BI), four type II (BII), two type III (BIII) with enhancement at the level of thickened septa; we also identified two solid enhancing lesions (BIV). We followed the BI and BII lesions with serial CEUS, while the remaining four cases underwent contrast-enhanced CT showing two solid lesions and two complex cysts with contrast enhancement in the septea. The four patients underwent surgical resection yielding three renal cell carcinomas one papillary carcinoma as the pathological findings. This preliminary study characterized solid nodules and BIII lesions for further evaluation by CT. CEUS seems to correctly characterize BI and BII cysts that are not clearly defined by standard ultrasound.

Assessment of the main pancreatic duct using computed tomography with multiplanar reconstructions.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to assess the morphology of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) using multiplanar reconstructions and to compare this with the morphology of the MPD of anatomic subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The morphology of the MPD was studied by means of multiplanar reconstructions obtained on the one hand from thin tomodensitometric slices and on the other hand from the dissection of anatomic subjects. This study involved 15 subjects in each group. RESULTS: Full multiplanar reconstruction was obtained in 13 cases. In 2 cases, the isthmus did not appear in the reconstructions. The morphology of the MPD was similar in both groups. The length of the MPD was identical at the head and isthmus of the pancreas in both groups but was greater in the dissection group than in the reconstruction group in the body and tail areas of the pancreas. The diameter of the MPD was greater at the head of the pancreas in the dissection group and was identical in both groups for the other segments of the MPD. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplanar tomodensitometric reconstruction of the main pancreatic duct is feasible. This new technique, currently under evaluation, could allow the study of canalar pathologies of the pancreas through tomodensitometry.