Demographic and Socioeconomic Trends in Cervical Fusion Utilization from 2004 Through 2021 and the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Cervical fusion rates increased in the U.S. exponentially 1990-2014, but trends leading up to/during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been fully evaluated by patient socioeconomic status (SES). Here, we provide the most recent, comprehensive characterization of demographic and SES trends in cervical fusions, including during the pandemic. METHODS: We collected the following variables on adults undergoing cervical fusions, 1/1/2004-3/31/2021, in Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart: age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, provider's practicing state, gender, race, education, and net worth. We performed multivariate linear and logistic regression to evaluate associations of cervical fusion rates with SES variables. RESULTS: Cervical fusion rates increased 2004-2016, then decreased 2016-2020. Proportions of Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients undergoing cervical fusions increased (OR = 1.001,1.001,1.004, P < 0.01), with a corresponding decrease in White patients (OR = 0.996, P < 0.001) over time. There were increases in cervical fusions in higher education groups (OR = 1.006, 1.002, P < 0.001) and lowest net worth group (OR = 1.012, P < 0.001). During the pandemic, proportions of White (OR = 1.015, P < 0.01) and wealthier patients (OR ≥ 1.015, P < 0.01) undergoing cervical fusions increased. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first documented decrease in annual cervical surgery rates in the U.S. Our data reveal a bimodal distribution for cervical fusion patients, with racial-minority, lower-net-worth, and highly-educated patients receiving increasing proportions of surgical interventions. White and wealthier patients were more likely to undergo cervical fusions during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been reported in other areas of medicine but not yet in spine surgery. There is still considerable work needed to improve equitable access to spine care for the entire U.S.

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States (From the Nationwide Readmission Database).

Clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have significantly improved with the accumulation of operator and institution experience as well as the wide use of newer generation devices. There is limited data on TAVI outcomes compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in contemporary practice in the United States. We queried the 2018 Nationwide Readmission Database of the United States. International Classification Diagnosis code 10 was used to extract TAVI and SAVR admissions. A propensity-matched cohort was created to compare TAVI and SAVR outcomes. A weighted 48,349 TAVI and 24,896 SAVR for aortic stenosis were included and 4.9% of TAVI were performed with an embolic protection device. In propensity-matched cohort (12,708 TAVI and 12,708 SAVR), TAVI conferred lower in-hospital mortality (1.7% vs 3.8%), acute kidney injury (11.3% vs 22.9%), and transfusion rate (5.9% vs. 20.6%) whereas new pacemaker rate was higher in TAVI compared with SAVR (10.5% vs. 7.0%) (all p values < 0.001). Stroke rate was similar between TAVI and SAVR (1.5% vs. 1.5%) (p value = 0.79). The routine discharge was more frequent (66.9% vs 25.8%) and length of stay was shorter (4.8 vs. 9.8 days) in TAVI than SAVR. Hospitalization cost was higher in SAVR than TAVI (51,962 vs 57,754 U.S. dollars) (all p values < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was also lower in TAVI compared with isolated SAVR. TAVI was performed more frequently than SAVR in 2018 in the United States with lower in-hospital mortality of TAVI compared with both SAVR and isolated SAVR.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on interventional cardiology fellowship training in the New York metropolitan area: A perspective from the United States epicenter.

BACKGROUND: The healthcare burden posed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the New York Metropolitan area has necessitated the postponement of elective procedures resulting in a marked reduction in cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) volumes with a potential to impact interventional cardiology (IC) fellowship training. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey sent electronically to 21 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited IC fellowship program directors (PDs) and their respective fellows. RESULTS: Fourteen programs (67%) responded to the survey and all acknowledged a significant decrease in CCL procedural volumes. More than half of the PDs reported part of their CCL being converted to inpatient units and IC fellows being redeployed to COVID-19 related duties. More than two-thirds of PDs believed that the COVID-19 pandemic would have a moderate (57%) or severe (14%) adverse impact on IC fellowship training, and 21% of the PDs expected their current fellows' average percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume to be below 250. Of 25 IC fellow respondents, 95% expressed concern that the pandemic would have a moderate (72%) or severe (24%) adverse impact on their fellowship training, and nearly one-fourth of fellows reported performing fewer than 250 PCIs as of March 1st. Finally, roughly one-third of PDs and IC fellows felt that there should be consideration of an extension of fellowship training or a period of early career mentorship after fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant reduction in CCL procedural volumes that is impacting IC fellowship training in the NY metropolitan area. These results should inform professional societies and accreditation bodies to offer tailored opportunities for remediation of affected trainees.

Value of Echocardiographic Right Ventricular and Pulmonary Pressure Assessment in Predicting Transcatheter Tricuspid Repair Outcome.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the value of echocardiographic right ventricular (RV) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) assessment in predicting transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge valve repair (TTVR) outcome. BACKGROUND: RV dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension are associated with poor prognosis and are systematically sought during tricuspid regurgitation evaluation. The value of echocardiographic assessment in predicting TTVR outcome is unknown. METHODS: Data were taken from the TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) registry, which includes patients undergoing TTVR at 14 European and North American centers. The primary outcome was 1-year survival free from hospitalization for heart failure, and secondary outcomes were 1-year survival and absence of hospital admission for heart failure at 1 year. RESULTS: Overall, 249 patients underwent TTVR between June 2015 and 2018 (mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE] 15.8 ± 15.3 mm, mean sPAP 43.6 ± 16.0 mm Hg). Tricuspid regurgitation grade ≥3+ was found in 96.8% of patients at baseline and 29.4% at final follow-up; 95.6% were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV initially, compared with 34.3% at follow-up (p < 0.05). Final New York Heart Association functional class did not differ among TAPSE and sPAP quartiles, even when both low TAPSE and high sPAP were present. Rates of 1-year survival and survival free from hospitalization for heart failure were 83.9% and 78.7%, respectively, without significant differences according to baseline echocardiographic RV characteristics (TAPSE, fractional area change, and end-diastolic area) and sPAP (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: TTVR provides clinical improvement, with 1-year survival free from hospital readmission >75% in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. Conventional echocardiographic parameters used to assess RV function and sPAP did not predict clinical outcome after TTVR.

Predictors of in-hospital mortality in coronary artery dissection: Findings from the National Inpatient Sample 2009-2010.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of coronary artery dissection (CD) remains poorly under-stood and little is known about the factors predicting mortality in these patients. We aimed to study the epidemiology of CD and predictors of mortality in these patients. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with CD in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009-2010 database using International Classification of Diseases ninth revision 414.12 were included in the study. Chronic conditions included in the analysis were diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), obesity, alcohol use, smoking, heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias. Non-cardiovascular conditions were connective tissue disorders, fibromuscular dysplasia, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan's syndrome, sarcoidosis, Crohn's disease, polycystic kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis including giant cell arteritis, polyarteritis nodosa and Takayasu's disease, cocaine use, early or premature labor. RESULTS: The prevalence of CD in the United States was 0.02% (n = 11,255), based on the hospital admissions reviewed in the database. The mean age was 63.25 years with women (64.62 years) being older than men (62.25 years) (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rate was 4.2%, with women (5.5%) having higher mortality than men (3.2%) (p = 0.009). Ventricular arrhythmias (OR 5.86, p < 0.001) predicted higher mortality, while hyperlipidemia (OR 0.26, p < 0.001) and CAD (OR 0.31, p = 0.001) predicted lower mortality in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that CD was more prevalent in men but women had higher mortality than men. Age, heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias were independent predictors of increased mortality but hyperlipidemia CAD predicted lower mortality in patients with CD.

The pattern of antimicrobial use for palliative care in-patients during the last week of life.

BACKGROUND: In terminally ill cancer patients approaching the dying phase, liberal use of antimicrobials is often viewed by palliative care experts as irrational. No previous reports have reviewed current antimicrobial use in palliative care settings in Saudi Arabia. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the pattern of antimicrobial use in a tertiary palliative care unit (TPCU) during the last week of patients' life. METHODS: Medical records of all patients who died in the TPCU over a 14-month period were reviewed for demographics as well as the frequency and rationale of antimicrobial use during the patients' last week of life. Information on antimicrobial use was obtained from a computerized pharmacy database. RESULTS: Of 138 patients who died with advanced cancer in the TPCU, 87 (63%) were on one or more antimicrobials during their last week of life. Antibiotics were more frequently used as compared to antifungal and antiviral agents, 64 (46.4%); 45 (32.6%); and 2 (1.5%), respectively. About one third (31.3%) of patients who received antibiotics during their last week of life were prescribed more than one antibiotic. Antimicrobials were mostly given systemically (79%) rather than topically (21%). The most common rationales for antimicrobial prescribing were oral thrush in 36 patients (25.4%), wound care in 29 patients (20.4%), and on empirical basis in 29 patients (20.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The current practice of antimicrobial prescribing, especially for patients who are eminently dying, may need to be reviewed. Initiation of antimicrobial treatment in this group of patients should be based on clear treatment goals and desired outcomes, considering views of patients and families.