Long-Term Prognostic Value of Simultaneous Assessment of Atherosclerosis and Ischemia in Patients with Suspected Angina: Implications for Routine Use of Carotid Ultrasound during Stress Echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: While the impact of carotid plaque on cardiovascular events is well investigated in asymptomatic epidemiologic studies, the long-term clinical impact of carotid plaque and its burden (CPB) in patients with new-onset suspected stable angina with no history of coronary artery disease beyond stress echocardiography (SE) is not known. We sought to investigate this with a prospective study, where patients were followed up for adverse events. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for SE underwent simultaneous carotid ultrasonography to assess CPB, defined as the total number of carotid plaques per patient. Stress echocardiography was reported off-line using a 17-segments model and four-point wall thickening scoring. Peak wall thickening scoring index was the sum of scores of each segment divided by 17. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients, 573 (age 59 ± 11, 45% male) had follow-up data. During a mean of 7.2 years, 85 patients had a first major adverse event (all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction: 68 had hard events and 17 had unplanned revascularization). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, pretest probability of coronary artery disease (P = .048), peak wall thickening scoring index (P < .0001), and CPB (P < .0001) predicted major adverse events; however, only CPB retained significance for both hard events and hard cardiac events (P = .001 and < .0001, respectively). Major adverse events and hard events were the least in patients with normal SE and absent carotid plaque (annualized event rate: 1.1% and 1.02%, respectively), with a significant increase in normal SE and carotid plaque disease (2.4% and 2.05%, P = .004 and P = .01, respectively). The presence of plaque did not have an impact on these outcomes in an abnormal SE cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected stable angina with no history of cardiovascular disease, carotid atherosclerosis and myocardial ischemia detected by ultrasound provided synergistic information for the long-term prediction of events, but atherosclerosis predicted hard events beyond myocardial ischemia, particularly in patients with a normal SE.

Relative diagnostic, prognostic and economic value of stress echocardiography versus exercise electrocardiography as initial investigation for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with new onset suspected angina.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesised that stress echocardiography (SE), may be superior to exercise ECG (ExECG), for predicting CAD and outcome, and cost-beneficial, when performed as initial investigation in newly suspected angina. METHODS: All patients seen in 2011, with suspected angina, no history of CAD, pre-test likelihood of CAD of > 10% and who underwent SE or ExECG as first line were identified retrospectively. Cost to diagnosis was calculated by adding the cost of all tests, up to and including coronary angiography (CA), on an intention-to-treat basis. Follow-up data on cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) were collected, 26 months after the presentation of the last study patient. RESULTS: A total of 456 patients underwent ExECG (224 (49%) negative, 93 (20%) positive, 139 (31%) inconclusive) and 241 underwent SE (200 (83%) negative, 35 (15%) positive, 6 (2%) inconclusive) as first line. In patients subsequently undergoing CA, CAD was present in 46% (37/80) of patients with positive ExECG vs. 72% (23/32) patients with positive SE (p = 0.01). Mean cost to diagnosis was £456 for the ExECG vs. £360 for the SE group (p = 0.002). Over a mean follow-up period of 31 ± 5 months, cardiac events were 2% each in negative SE vs. negative ExECG (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: SE is superior to ExECG for prediction of CAD and is cost-beneficial when used as initial test in patients with no history of CAD presenting with suspected angina.

Role of simultaneous carotid ultrasound in patients undergoing stress echocardiography for assessment of chest pain with no previous history of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively explored prevalence of carotid disease (CD), its independent association with coronary artery disease (CAD) and outcome as well as potential impact on management, in patients undergoing stress echocardiography (SE) for new onset chest pain without known CAD. METHODS: Accordingly, 591 consecutive patients referred for SE underwent carotid ultrasound. Carotid disease was defined as carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT) >75th percentile for age and sex and/or presence of plaque. RESULTS: Myocardial ischemia was demonstrated in only a minority (11%), but there was a high prevalence of CD (70%). Incidence of CD was similar in patients with and without ischemia (76% versus 69%, P = .26). Carotid data led to reclassification of Framingham risk score categories in 65% of patients as well as more than a third of negative SE patients potentially benefitting from primary prevention therapy. Of the 83 patients undergoing coronary arteriography, 59 (71%) demonstrated coronary atherosclerosis (any atheroma) and 33 (40%) CAD. Positive predictive value of SE for CAD was 56%, but presence of carotid plaque improved it to 70%. Although both CD and plaque showed association with CAD and revascularization, after adjustment for conventional risk factors, only carotid plaque maintained significant association (P = .024 and P = .023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is significantly higher prevalence of CD compared with myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing SE and carotid ultrasound for suspected CAD. This can lead to significant Framingham risk score reclassification with important primary prevention implications. Carotid plaque is superior to clinical assessment for the prediction of CAD and improves positive predictive value of SE for CAD in these patients.