The association of FRAX with predictors of falls in the assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Turkey: the fracture study of Turkey (FRACT study).

Although FRAX is used for fracture risk evaluation, this tool does not include balance and fall risk. The association between the predictors of falls and high FRAX scores we found in this study suggests that risk indicators for falls may add substantial value to FRAX by improving fracture risk prediction. PURPOSE: This observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study aimed to assess the fall risk predictors and explore their association with FRAX in Turkish patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: Two hundred and nine (209) women with postmenopausal osteoporosis referred to the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa were enrolled in the FRACT study (The Fracture Study of Turkey). Clinical risk factors were assessed using the FRAX tool. Tandem stance, Tandem walking, Timed up and go (TUG), and Chair stand tests were performed to assess balance and fall risk. RESULTS: Among patients with a mean age of 67.6 (± 9.7) years, 66 patients (31.6%) had osteoporosis without fractures and 143 patients (68.4%) had fragility fractures. The proportion of patients with poor performance of fall prediction tests was significantly higher in patients with a fragility fracture than those with osteoporosis alone. There was an inverse relationship between dynamic balance tests and the reported number of prior falls in the past year. FRAX score was higher in patients with impaired Tandem stance, Tandem walking, and TUG tests (p = 0.008, p = 0.035, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Assessment of fall risk predictors should be one of the major pillars in the physical evaluation of osteoporotic patients in the FLS setting. FRAX is a useful tool to determine the fracture risk of patients with both static and dynamic balance impairments. Combining balance assessment with FRAX may be an important step to optimize osteoporosis risk assessment.

Assessment of quality of life and depression in spouses of patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

The objective of this study is to investigate the quality of life and the rates of depression in spouses/partners of patients with AS compared with spouses/partners of healthy controls". Twenty-five persons with AS and their 25 spouses (21 women and 4 men) and 25 healthy controls were recruited consecutively. All the subjects completed 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire forms and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17). Mean age was 35 ± 6.47 years in spouse group (SG) and 36.26 ± 5.93 in control group (CG). In SG and CG, the SF-36 subscale scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Social functioning, mental health, emotional role, and general health were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in SG compared with CG. The average score of social functioning was found to be 65.41 in spouses of patients compared with healthy controls (90.75). Depression scores were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in SG compared with CG. Among SF-36 subgroups in spouses, general health perception had a negatively significant correlation with depression scores (P < 0.05) and duration of ankylosing spondylitis (P < 0.05). A positively significant correlation has been identified between bodily pain and depression scores in spouses (P < 0.05). Therefore, female partners of male patients were found to be more depressive. Being a spouse of a patient with AS significantly interferes with quality of life and increases the depression frequency.