RESUMO
Background: Gender-based disparities in health-care are common and can affect access to care. We aimed to investigate the impact of gender and socio-environmental indicators on health-care access in oncology in France. Methods: Using the national health insurance system database in France, we identified patients (aged ≥18 years) who were diagnosed with solid invasive cancers between the 1st of January 2018 and the 31st of December 2019. We ensured that only incident cases were identified by excluding patients with an existing cancer diagnosis in 2016 and 2017; skin cancers other than melanoma were also excluded. We extracted 71 socio-environmental variables related to patients' living environment and divided these into eight categories: inaccessibility to public transport, economic deprivation, unemployment, gender-related wage disparities, social isolation, educational barriers, familial hardship, and insecurity. We employed a mixed linear regression model to assess the influence of age, comorbidities, and all eight socio-environmental indices on health-care access, while evaluating the interaction with gender. Health-care access was measured using absolute and relative cancer care expertise indexes. Findings: In total, 594,372 patients were included: 290,658 (49%) women and 303,714 (51%) men. With the exception of unemployment, all socio-environmental indices, age, and comorbidities were inversely correlated with health-care access. However, notable interactions with gender were observed, with a stronger association between socio-environmental factors and health-care access in women than in men. In particular, inaccessibility to public transport (coefficient for absolute cancer care expertise index = -1.10 [-1.22, -0.99], p < 0.0001), familial hardship (-0.64 [-0.72, -0.55], p < 0.0001), social isolation (-0.38 [-0.46, -0.30], p < 0.0001), insecurity (-0.29 [-0.37, -0.21], p < 0.0001), and economic deprivation (-0.13 [-0.19, -0.07], p < 0.0001) had a strong negative impact on health-care access in women. Interpretation: Access to cancer care is determined by a complex interplay of gender and various socio-environmental factors. While gender is a significant component, it operates within the context of multiple socio-environmental influences. Future work should focus on developing targeted interventions to address these multifaceted barriers and promote equitable health-care access for both genders. Funding: None.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that affects 50% of women who have given birth in their lifetime. With stop of vaginal mesh sale in 2019, the sacrospinous fixation technique according to Richter with native tissue has seen its incidence tripled in 15 years. Classically, sacrospinous fixation according to Richter is performed unilaterally, however its unilateral or bilateral character is controversial. Objective of this work is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by the posterior approach with native tissue (SSB). METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center study. From March 12, 2010 to March 23, 2020, all first-time operated patients who underwent SSB in CHU Strasbourg gynecological surgery unit for symptomatic POP management were included. The main endpoint of our work is the anatomical and functional success rate at 12 and 24 months. The secondary judgment criteria of our work were based on the postoperative evaluation of patient's quality of life according to the PFDI-20 score as well as the rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS: 77 patients were included in our work. The anatomical success rate at 12 months is 94 and 81% at 24 months regardless of the compartment affected. The functional success rate is 94% at 12 months and 82% at 24 months. Quality of life evaluation through the PFDI-20 scale revealed a clear improvement in the symptomatology related to POP: 127/300 +/- 27.3. preoperatively and 59.8 ± 14.7 postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Bilateral sacrospinous fixation according to Richter by posterior approach with native tissue is a safe and effective surgical technique allowing a clear improvement in patients quality of life.