Straight-to-test colonoscopy: Has it improved the detection of colorectal cancer? A 7- year review.

AIM: Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) improves outcome. Straight-To-Test (STT) pathway was introduced in Whittington Hospital in 2012. The aim was to reduce the time to first oncological treatment and minimise unnecessary outpatient clinic appointments. However, this pathway has added significant burden to the trust in terms of number of procedures to be done.We assessed the diagnostic yield and the effectiveness of this pathway in improving the time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer. We also performed a cost-effective analysis and discussed the current literature along with interventions to further improve the benefits of STT investigations. METHOD: This is a prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent STT examinations in a single centre from January 2012 till December 2018. The parameters collected were patient details, procedures performed, findings and discharge plan. We also performed a cost-effective analysis. RESULTS: A total 1648 (90.8%) of patients identified suitable for STT pathway underwent colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy. From this, 764 (50.2%) patients had diagnosed pathology and CRC was detected in 50(3%) of the patients. We also estimated annual savings of £ 21,599.54 (£151,196.76 in seven years). Patients on the STT pathway took 25 days to obtain results as compared to 40 days in the standard pathway. The decision to take the patient off the cancer pathway was shortened by 3 weeks. CONCLUSION: STT pathway has proven to be safe and cost-effective means of investigation. However, further improvement is needed in the implementation to make it a sustainable. mode of investigation in long run and increase the pickup rate of colorectal cancer through STT.

Paid work increases and state benefit claims decrease after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is a clinically effective treatment for obesity and has been shown to be cost-effective. The impact of bariatric surgery on the subsequent ability to work and the uptake of state-funded benefits is not well documented. METHODS: A consecutive series of 79 patients who had undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) were surveyed to assess changes in their ability to work and the number and type of state benefits claimed after surgery. RESULTS: 59 patients (75%) responded, median age 45, median follow-up 14 months. There was a 32% increase in the number of respondents in paid work after surgery (P<0.05). The mean weekly hours worked increased from 30.1 to 35.8 hours (P<0.01). Respondents also reported a decrease in obesity-related physical and emotional constraints on their ability to do work (P<0.01). Fewer patients claimed state benefits postoperatively (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: More patients perform paid work after LRYGBP and LAGB than beforehand, and the number of weekly hours they work increases. After surgery, patients claim fewer state benefits.