Electronic Medical Record Use and Satisfaction Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic medical record (EMR) use among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons has evolved substantially within the past decade. In response to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, large hospitals and tertiary pediatric medical centers rapidly acquired and implemented EMRs with uncertainty as to the potential impact on patient care and operational efficiency of subspecialists. This study reviews the background and regulatory framework for Meaningful Use of EMR and assesses the current landscape of EMR utilization by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: In 2015, the Practice Management Committee distributed a survey regarding EMR use and satisfaction to members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. Survey responses from 324 members were used to analyze levels of satisfaction by EMR platform and practice type and to consider drivers of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of end users. RESULTS: Although there were no differences in overall satisfaction based on vendor or practice type, significant differences were noted for 5 specific parameters of satisfaction, including: usefulness of templates, efficiency of practice workflow, information services support, number of logon events, and speed of the system. A user/vendor map is provided to facilitate networking among providers and groups utilizing common EMR platforms to help bring about rational improvements in EMR functionality for the future. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial effort needs to be made to improve subspecialty-specific EMR documentation, order entry, research tools, and clinical workflows to enhance the processes of care for children with orthopaedic conditions in the era of EMR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Pediatric Sports Medicine, A New Subspeciality in Orthopedics: An Analysis of the Surgical Volume of Candidates for the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Certification Exam Over the Past Decade.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric orthopaedic surgery has become increasingly subspecialized over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to analyze the volume of pediatric sports medicine cases performed by surgeons applying for the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons (ABOS) Part II certification exam over the past decade, comparing caseloads according to the type(s) of fellowship completed. METHODS: The ABOS database was reviewed for all surgeons applying for the ABOS Part II certification exam from 2004 to 2014. Fellowship training of the candidates was recorded as Pediatrics, Sports, and Dual-Fellowship (fellowship in both Pediatrics and Sports). All other candidates were categorized as "Other". A total of 102,424 pediatric cases (patients below 18 years) were reviewed to identify sports medicine cases performed by CPT code. Multiple linear regression and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine trends in case volume overall and according to fellowship training for all patients, patients ≥13 and patients <13. One-way ANOVA testing was used to compare multiple means followed by multiple post hoc comparisons using a Tukey all pairwise approach using SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 14,636 pediatric sports medicine cases were performed. There was an increase in the number of sports medicine cases performed in patients <13 (117.5±31.8 from 2004-2009 to 212.4±70.1 from 2010-2014, P=0.035; r=0.743, P=0.0007). The number of Pediatrics (r=0.601, P=0.005), Sports (r=0.741, P=0.0007) and Dual-Fellowship candidates increased (r=0.600, P=0.005) from 2004-2014. Dual-Fellowship surgeons performed 21.4% of pediatric sports medicine cases in 2014 when compared to 2.1% in 2004 (919% increase). As a group, the number of pediatric sports cases performed by Dual-Fellowship (r=0.630, P=0.004) and Sports (r=0.567, P=0.007) candidates has increased, while the number performed by "Other" candidates has decreased (r=0.758, P=0.0005). Per surgeon, Dual-Fellowship candidates performed a greater number of pediatric sports cases per collection period (36.5±9.18) than Pediatrics (6.71±0.94), Sports (5.99±0.46), and "Other" (1.21±0.15, P<0.0001 for each) candidates from 2004 to 2014. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past decade operative sports injuries have increased in children with a similar increase in the number of orthopedic surgeons specializing in pediatric sports medicine. On a per surgeon basis, these dual fellowship-trained candidates have performed on average five times the number of pediatric sports medicine cases compared to all other ABOS Part II candidates. These trends may point towards the development of a new subspecialty of pediatric sports medicine among orthopedic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Retrospective Database Review.

Changes in the Practice of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons Over the Past Decade: Analysis of the Database of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the number of the graduates of pediatric orthopaedic fellowship programs over the past decade creating the potential for increased competition in the field. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of increased number of pediatric orthopaedic fellowship graduates on case volume as well as the type of procedures performed by recent graduates of pediatric orthopaedic fellowship programs from 2004 to 2014. METHODS: Case logs submitted for the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II examination by applicants with the self-declared subspecialty of pediatric orthopaedics from 2004 to 2014 were analyzed. Cases were categorized as trauma (upper and lower extremity), spine, sports medicine, hip, deformity correction, foot and ankle, hardware removal, soft tissue procedures, and other. The period was divided into 3 sections: 2004-2007, 2008-2011, 2012-2014. Descriptive analysis was used to report the change in the volume and pattern of practices over the study period. RESULTS: Although the number of pediatric orthopaedic subspecialty applicants increased from 15 to 44 from 2004 to 2014, the average cases per year increased from 2142 in 2004-2007 to 2960 in 2007-2011, and to 4160 in 2012-2014. The number of cases performed per applicant remained stable over the study period. Upper extremity trauma cases were the largest category of cases reported and increased in case volume by 141% from 2004 to 2014. Sports medicine cases increased in volume by 175%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a large increase in the number of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons over the past decade, there is a concomitant increased in case volume across almost all subspecialties within pediatric orthopaedics. As such, pediatric orthopaedic surgeons who start a new practice can expect to develop a robust practice with a diverse group of pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Subspecialty Training Among Graduates of Pediatric Orthopaedic Fellowships: An 11-Year Analysis of the Database of American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The field of pediatric orthopaedic surgery is evolving with a reported increase in the number of pediatric orthopaedic fellows being trained as well as an increase in the number of fellows completing additional fellowship training in another subspecialty. The purpose of this study was to examine the historic trends of trainees seeking multiple fellowships within pediatric orthopaedics over an 11-year period using the database of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS). METHODS: We queried the ABOS database for fellowship choice of applicants for the ABOS part II oral examination with the self-declared subspecialty of pediatric orthopaedics during the years of 2005 to 2015. Descriptive analysis was performed to determine the percentage of applicants who completed >1 fellowship, and the type of subspecialty fellowship completed. χ analysis was used to compare the proportion of multiple fellowship trainees between years. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2015, 310 applicants for ABOS part II pediatric subspecialty examination had completed a fellowship in pediatric orthopaedic surgery, with that number increasing from 14 to 43/y over that span. Forty-five trainees (15%) completed 48 additional fellowships over that decade, with 2 recent trainees completing multiple additional fellowships. The most common additional fellowships were sports (n=22, 46%), hand (n=8, 17%), and spine (n=7, 15%). The rate of additional fellowship training increased over 5-fold from 5% in the first 3 years of the study to 28% in the last 2 years of the study (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of trainees completing additional subspecialty fellowships in addition to pediatric orthopaedics has risen over the past decade. The precise cause and effect of such change is uncertain and likely multifactorial. Reexamination of our classic training paradigms may be warranted in light of these trends. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Pursuit of Scholarship: Why We Should Care About Resident Research.

Research is a foundational component of an orthopaedic residency. It fosters intellectual curiosity and pursuit of excellence, while teaching discipline and the scientific method. These are the key principles for careers in both community-based practice and academia. Currently, no consensus exists on how to best engage residents and support their research endeavors. In 2014, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Specialty Societies Research and Quality Committee convened a Clinician-Scientist Collaboration Workgroup. The workgroup's task was to identify barriers to clinical and basic science research, and to propose feasible recommendations to overcome these barriers. Herein, we have compiled the opinions of various stakeholder constituencies on how to foster scholarly pursuits during an orthopaedic residency. These opinions reflect the workgroup's conclusions that research is directly and indirectly influenced by funding, departmental support, and mentorship, and that early exposure and dedicated time to pursue scholarly activities may have a positive impact on lifelong research interests.

Magnetically controlled growing rods for scoliosis surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Early onset scoliosis can be both a disfiguring as well as a life threatening condition. When more conservative treatments fail, pediatric spinal surgeons are forced to consider operative interventions. Traditionally, these interventions have involved the insertion of a variety of implants into the patient with a limited number of anchor points controlling the spine. In the past, these pediatric patients have had multiple surgeries for elective lengthening of these devices to facilitate their growth while attempting to control the scoliosis. These patients often experience a physical and emotional toll from their multiple repeated surgeries. Growing spine techniques have also had a noted high complication rate due to implant dislodgement and infections. Recently, the development of non-invasively, self-lengthening growing rods has occurred. These devices have the potential to allow for the devices to be lengthened magnetically in a conscious patient in the surgeon's office. Areas covered: This review summarized previously published articles in the English literature using a key word search in PubMed for: 'magnetically controlled growing rods', 'Magec rods', 'magnetic growing rods' and 'growing rods'. Expert commentary: Magnetically controlled growing rods have an advantage over growing rods in lengthening the growing spine in the absence of repetitive surgeries.

Patient satisfaction surveys: an evaluation of POSNA members' knowledge and experience.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction surveys (PSS) were originally designed to identify areas in need of improvement in patient interactions for individuals, practices, and institutions. As a result of the Affordable Care Act, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services incorporated PSS into a formula designed to determine the quality of medical care delivered to hospital inpatients; the resultant score and rank will determine subsequent hospital payments. This survey was developed to evaluate POSNA members' knowledge of and experience with PSS. METHODS: The POSNA Practice Management Committee developed a 14-question survey that was sent to all active and candidate members (850). A total of 229 members responded; and results were tabulated by answer and simple percentages were calculated for each question. Comments were reviewed and grouped by similarity to identify frequency. RESULTS: A total of 82% of respondents were aware of PSS with 67% stating they were utilized in their setting. Utilization of PSS rarely alters clinical decision making. However, PSS do affect decisions regarding the patient experience; and 45% of respondents believe that PSS have utility with respect to business decisions. Fifty-nine percent of respondents feel that scores can be predictably improved. Less than half the respondents stated that they had a good or excellent understanding of PSS and only 48% believe that PSS are a valid measure of health care quality. CONCLUSIONS: POSNA members' knowledge of and experience with PSS are not universal or uniform. Although most agree that patient satisfaction does not drive clinical decision making, it does appear to impact business and clinic-flow decisions with the idea that it can be predictably improved. Despite this, members' self-assessed that knowledge is average and it is not clear to the members that patient satisfaction reflects medical quality. On the basis of these findings and as the impacts of PSS become more prominent, efforts to educate the members of POSNA about PSS should be enhanced. Furthermore, research to identify and develop best practices that enhance patient satisfaction and well-being while minimizing costs should be supported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.