Association of COVID-19 and the prevalence of in-person vs telehealth primary care visits and subsequent impacts on tobacco use assessment and referral for cessation assistance.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of health care delivery. Smoking remains an important risk factor for multiple chronic conditions and may exacerbate more severe symptoms of COVID-19. Thus, it is important to understand how pandemic-induced changes in primary care practice patterns affected smoking assessment and cessation assistance. METHODS: Electronic health record (EHR) data from 8 community health centers were examined from March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2022. Data include both telehealth (phone and video) and in-person office visits and represent 310,388 visits by adult patients. Rates of smoking assessment, provision of referral to counseling and orders for smoking cessation medications were calculated. Comparisons by visit mode and time period were examined using generalized estimating equations and logistic regression. RESULTS: The proportion of telehealth visits was <0.1% one year prior to COVID-19 onset and, 54.5% and 34.1% 1 and 2 years after. The odds of asking about smoking status and offering a referral to smoking cessation counseling were significantly higher during in-person vs. telehealth visits; AOR (95% CI) = 15.0 (14.7 -15.4) and AOR (95% CI)= 6.5 (3.0 - 13.9), respectively. The interaction effect of visit type * time period was significant for ordering smoking cessation medications. CONCLUSION: Telehealth visits were significantly less likely to include smoking status assessment and referral to smoking cessation counseling compared to in-person visits. Given that smoking assessment and cessation assistance do not require face-to-face interactions with health care providers, continued efforts are needed to ensure provision at all visits, regardless of modality. IMPLICATIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of health care seeking and delivery with a considerable rise in telehealth visits. This study examined one year prior to the onset of COVID-19 and two years after to evaluate the assessment of tobacco use and assistance with tobacco cessation and differences during in-person vs telehealth visits. Tobacco assessment was 15 times more likely during in-person vs. telehealth visits in the two years post onset of COVID-19. Given that telehealth visits are likely to continue, ensuring that patients are regularly assessed for tobacco regardless of visit modality is an important concern for health systems.

Sustained Effects of a Systems-Based Strategy for Tobacco Cessation Assistance.

INTRODUCTION: Primary care settings that serve lower-income patients are critical for reducing tobacco-related disparities; however, tobacco-related care in these settings remains low. This study examined whether processes for the provision of tobacco cessation care are sustained 18 and 24 months after implementing a health system-level intervention consisting of electronic health record functionality changes and expansion of rooming staff roles. METHODS: This nonrandomized stepped-wedge study included electronic health record data from adults with ≥1 primary care visit to 1 of 8 community-based clinics between August 2016 and September 2019. Generalized estimating equations methods were used to compute ORs of asking about tobacco use and among those who use tobacco, providing brief advice to quit and assessing readiness to quit, contrasting 18 and 24 months after implementation to both preimplementation (baseline) and 12 months after implementation. Using a 2-level model of patients clustered in clinics, outcomes were examined over time by clinic site. Analyses were conducted in 2022. RESULTS: A total of 305,665 patient visits were evaluated. Significantly higher odds of all 3 outcomes were observed at 18 and 24 months than at baseline. The odds of asking about tobacco use increased, whereas the odds of advising to quit were similar at 18 and 24 months to those at 12 months. Odds of assessing readiness to quit decreased at 18 months (OR=0.71; 95% CI=0.63, 0.80) and 24 months (OR=0.46; 95% CI=0.40, 0.52). Performance varied significantly by clinical site. CONCLUSIONS: Health system changes can have a sustained impact on tobacco assessment and the provision of brief advice among lower-income patients. Strategies to sustain assessment of readiness to quit are warranted.

Characteristics of Patients Engaging in Quitline Counseling After an Electronic Referral.

INTRODUCTION: Proactive, electronic referral of primary care patients to quitlines has great potential to provide evidence-based tobacco-cessation assistance to tobacco users. However, the quitline contact rates and engagement of individuals beyond 1 counseling call are poor. This study examines the characteristics of electronically referred patients who engage with the quitline. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 2,407 primary care patients who reported using tobacco and accepted an electronic referral to the quitline. Outcomes included contact, enrollment, and receipt of ≥2 counseling sessions from the quitline. All measures were assessed from the electronic health record. The association of patient characteristics and outcomes was evaluated using logistic regression modeling with generalized estimating equation methods. Data were collected in 2016‒2018 and were analyzed in 2020. RESULTS: Among 2,407 referred patients, 794 (33.0%) were contacted; of those, 571 enrolled (71.9%); and of those, 240 (42.0%) engaged in ≥2 quitline counseling sessions. In multivariable analyses, older adults (aged 50-64 and ≥65 years) were significantly more likely to be contacted (OR=2.32, 95% CI=1.6, 3.4) and to receive ≥2 counseling sessions (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.2, 4.7) than those aged 18-34 years. Those with both Medicare and Medicaid insurance coverage were more likely than those with Medicaid only to be contacted (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.4, 2.2), to enroll (OR=1.84, 95% CI=1.2, 2.9), and to receive ≥2 counseling sessions (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.2, 2.9). CONCLUSIONS: The current quitline phone-based approach is less likely to engage younger adults and those with Medicaid coverage; however, there is a need to improve quitline engagement across all patients. Identification and testing of alternative engagement approaches are needed.

Designing for Sustainability: An Approach to Integrating Staff Role Changes and Electronic Health Record Functionality Within Safety-Net Clinics to Address Provision of Tobacco Cessation Care.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines urge primary care practices to routinely provide tobacco cessation care, but quality indicators for the provision of advice and assistance to quit smoking lag. This study evaluated the implementation of a systems-based strategy to improve performance of tobacco cessation care in primary care clinics. METHODS: Changes to the electronic health record (EHR) facilitated staff to document when they ask about tobacco use, advise the patient to quit, offer to connect the patient to a quitline (QL) counselor, and refer interested patients to receive a call from a QL. Medical assistants (MAs) were trained to use the new sections of the EHR, and their roles were expanded to include the provision of brief cessation advice and activation of the QL referral. Primary outcomes were change in tobacco cessation processes preimplementation vs. one, three, and six months postimplementation of the strategy. RESULTS: The increase in performance of tobacco cessation care was significant and sustained at six months postimplementation for assessing smoking status (50.9% vs. 76.3%; odds ratio [OR] = 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.80-3.31), providing advice (15.1% vs. 92.7%; OR = 69.3; 95% CI = 51.88-92.60), assessing readiness to quit (22.8% vs. 76.6%; OR = 10.80; 95% CI = 8.92-13.08), and accepting a referral to the QL (1.3% vs. 21.7%; OR = 20.31; 95% CI = 4.91-84.05). CONCLUSION: Key stakeholder engagement informed a system change intervention that includes an EHR-supported role expansion of MAs for QL referrals; these changes substantially increased the provision of tobacco cessation care.

Current practices in depression care.

Despite improved awareness among the medical community concerning common mental health disorders, the high prevalence of depression in the United States remains unchanged and has been compounded by increasing evidence of gaps in mental health care for ethnic and racial minorities. Thus, there is a strong need for the timely creation of comprehensive educational initiatives aimed at improving the quality of care provided by mental health professionals and primary care physicians. Fundamental to this process is the examination of current treatment standards, as well as identification of practices that require improved physician education. Consistent use of appropriate screening tools, diagnostic accuracy and timeliness, continual assessment of illness severity, adherence to practice guidelines, and individualized patient care need heightened attention to improve outcomes. This article describes the most prevalent types of depression and summarizes current practices in depression care, with an emphasis on treatment standards and opportunities for improved performance.