The predictive ability of the STarT Back Screening Tool in a Danish secondary care setting.

INTRODUCTION: The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool (SBT) in secondary care settings has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the SBT's predictive ability in a Danish secondary care setting and compare this to a Danish primary care setting. METHODS: Poor clinical outcome at 6 months (>30 points on a 0-100 Roland Morris Disability Scale) was calculated in secondary care (n = 960) and primary care (n = 172) cohorts. The cohorts were stratified into SBT subgroups and estimates of additional risk for poor outcome were calculated [relative risk (RR), unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios]. The discriminative ability was determined using the area under the curve statistic. RESULTS: In secondary care 69.0 % and in primary care 40.2 % had poor outcome on activity limitation. Although significant, the predictive ability of the SBT in secondary care (medium-risk RR 1.5, high-risk RR 1.7) was not as strong as in primary care (medium-risk RR 2.3, high-risk RR 3.5). Adjusting for episode duration and pain intensity only changed the predictive ability marginally in secondary care. The discriminative ability of the SBT was similar in both cohorts despite differences in the predictive ability. CONCLUSION: The SBT had less predictive ability in a Danish secondary care setting compared to a Danish primary care setting for persistent activity limitation at 6 months follow-up. SBT-targeted treatment implications in secondary care were not investigated in this study.

Patients with low back pain differ from those who also have leg pain or signs of nerve root involvement - a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Leg pain associated with low back pain (LBP) is recognized as a risk factor for a poor prognosis, and is included as a component in most LBP classification systems. The location of leg pain relative to the knee and the presence of a positive straight leg raise test have been suggested to have clinical implications. To understand differences between such leg pain subgroups, and whether differences include potentially modifiable characteristics, the purpose of this paper was to describe characteristics of patients classified into the Quebec Task Force (QTF) subgroups of: 1) LBP only, 2) LBP and pain above the knee, 3) LBP and pain below the knee, and 4) LBP and signs of nerve root involvement. METHODS: Analysis of routine clinical data from an outpatient department. Based on patient reported data and clinical findings, patients were allocated to the QTF subgroups and described according to the domains of pain, activity limitation, work participation, psychology, general health and clinical examination findings. RESULTS: A total of 2,673 patients aged 18-95 years (median 47) who were referred for assessment of LBP were included. Increasing severity was consistently observed across the subgroups from LBP only to LBP with signs of nerve root involvement although subgroup differences were small. LBP patients with leg pain differed from those with LBP only on a wide variety of parameters, and patients with signs of nerve root involvement had a more severe profile on almost all measures compared with other patients with back-related leg pain. CONCLUSION: LBP patients with pain referral to the legs were more severely affected than those with local LBP, and patients with signs of nerve root involvement were the ones most severily affected. These findings underpin the concurrent validity of the Quebec Task Force Classification. However, the small size of many between-subgroup differences amid the large variability in this sample of cross-sectional data also underlines that the heterogeneity of patients with LBP is more complex than that which can be explained by leg pain patterns alone. The implications of the observed differences also require investigation in longitudinal studies.

[Criteria validation of the Roland Morris questionnaire. A Danish translation of the international scale for the assessment of functional level in patients with low back pain and sciatica]. / Kriterievalidering af Roland Morris-spørgeskemaet. Et oversat internationalt skema til vurdering af aendringer i funktionsniveau hos patienter med laendesmerter og iskias.

INTRODUCTION: The main concern of patients with low back pain is the functional limitation which the symptoms cause. Therefore it is important to find a valid tool by means of which their functional level can be assessed. The aim of this study was to validate the first Danish translation of the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), which evaluates the functional level of activity of patients with low back pain and possible sciatica. The RMQ was compared with the functional scale of a Danish functional and pain level questionnaire, The Low Back Pain Rating Scale (RS), and the functional scale (PF) of the SF-36. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Independently, three professionals made a retroversion of the RMQ. Then 135 patients with lumbar disc herniation completed the RMQ, RS and the SF-36. The patients comprised 47% women and 53% men with an average age of 43 years. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the RMQ and the other two questionnaires was found. RMQ-RS; r = 0.89, p < or = 0.001, RMQ-PF (SF-36); r = -0.88 p < or = 0.001. A Chronbach Alpha showed a value of 0.94 (scale 0-1). Differences in scores between the three questionnaires were within the 95% limits of agreement. The average RMQ score was 10% higher than the score of RS and PF (SF-36). CONCLUSION: According to this study the RMQ can be used as a valid tool in the assessment of the functional level of patients with lumbar pain and previous lumbar herniation. Due to the fact that the questionnaire is fast and easy to complete, it is valid, reliable and sensitive and widely used internationally. We recommend the questionnaire to be used as a supplement to the clinical examination both in clinical practice and in research.