The impact of normothermic machine perfusion and acuity circles on waitlist time, mortality, and cost in liver transplantation: A multicenter experience.

Ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) helps increase the use of extended criteria donor livers. However, the impact of an NMP program on waitlist times and mortality has not been evaluated. Adult patients listed for liver transplant (LT) at 2 academic centers from January 1, 2015, to September 1, 2023, were included (n=2773) to allow all patients ≥6 months follow-up from listing. Routine NMP was implemented on October 14, 2022. Waitlist outcomes were compared from pre-NMP pre-acuity circles (n=1460), pre-NMP with acuity circles (n=842), and with NMP (n=381). Median waitlist time was 79 days (IQR: 20-232 d) at baseline, 49 days (7-182) with acuity circles, and 14 days (5-56) with NMP ( p <0.001). The rate of transplant-per-100-person-years improved from 61-per-100-person-years to 99-per-100-person-years with acuity circles and 194-per-100-person-years with NMP ( p <0.001). Crude mortality without transplant decreased from 18.3% (n=268/1460) to 13.3% (n=112/843), to 6.3% (n=24/381) ( p <0.001) with NMP. The incidence of mortality without LT was 15-per-100-person-years before acuity circles, 19-per-100 with acuity circles, and 9-per-100-person-years after NMP ( p <0.001). Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at LT was lowest with NMP, but Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at listing was highest in this era ( p <0.0001). The median donor risk index of transplanted livers at baseline was 1.54 (1.27-1.82), 1.66 (1.42-2.16) with acuity circles, and 2.06 (1.63-2.46) with NMP ( p <0.001). Six-month post-LT survival was not different between eras ( p =0.322). The total cost of health care while waitlisted was lowest in the NMP era ($53,683 vs. $32,687 vs. $23,688, p <0.001); cost-per-day did not differ between eras ( p =0.152). The implementation of a routine NMP program was associated with reduced waitlist time and mortality without compromising short-term survival after liver transplant despite increased use of riskier grafts. Routine NMP use enables better waitlist management with reduced health care costs.

Impact of Back-to-Base Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Complications and Costs: A Multicenter, Real-World Risk-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Assess cost and complication outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). BACKGROUND: End-ischemic NMP is often used to aid logistics, yet its impact on outcomes after LT remains unclear, as does its true impact on costs associated with transplantation. METHODS: Deceased donor liver recipients at 2 centers (January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2023) were included. Retransplants, splits, and combined grafts were excluded. End-ischemic NMP (OrganOx-Metra) was implemented in October 2022 for extended-criteria donation after brain death (DBDs), all donations after circulatory deaths (DCDs), and logistics. NMP cases were matched 1:2 with static cold storage controls (SCS) using the Balance-of-Risk [donation after brain death (DBD)-grafts] and UK-DCD Score (DCD-grafts). RESULTS: Overall, 803 transplantations were included, 174 (21.7%) receiving NMP. Matching was achieved between 118 NMP-DBDs with 236 SCS; and 37 NMP-DCD with 74 corresponding SCS. For both graft types, median inpatient comprehensive complications index values were comparable between groups. DCD-NMP grafts experienced reduced cumulative 90-day comprehensive complications index (27.6 vs 41.9, P =0.028). NMP also reduced the need for early relaparotomy and renal replacement therapy, with subsequently less frequent major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IVa). This effect was more pronounced in DCD transplants. NMP had no protective effect on early biliary complications. Organ acquisition/preservation costs were higher with NMP, yet NMP-treated grafts had lower 90-day pretransplant costs in the context of shorter waiting list times. Overall costs were comparable for both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first risk-adjusted outcome and cost analysis comparing NMP and SCS. In addition to logistical benefits, NMP was associated with a reduction in relaparotomy and bleeding in DBD grafts, and overall complications and post-LT renal replacement for DCDs. While organ acquisition/preservation was more costly with NMP, overall 90-day health care costs-per-transplantation were comparable.

Environmental risk assessment associated with acidic volcanics in Egypt.

The present work aims to study gamma rays emitted by radionuclides such as 238U, 232Th and 40K from acidic Monqul volcanics. The studied volcanics are represented by a thick stratified lava flows interbanded with their pyroclastics. They are composed of thick lava flows of andesite and, to a lesser extent of basalt, and acidic volcanics including rhyolite and dacite. The average values of 238U, 232Th and 40K are (46 ± 24 Bq kg-1), (62 ± 11 Bq kg-1) and (1227 ± 318 Bq kg-1) in the rhyolite-dacite samples are greater than the worldwide average. The variation of radioactive bearing minerals observed inside granite faults produced the great amounts of radioactivity perceived in the samples. Calculating radiological risks is used to assess the public's radioactive risk from radionuclides revealed in the studied Rhyolite-dacite samples. The acceptable limit for excess lifetime cancer (ELCR) evaluations has been exceeded. As a result, Rhyolite-dacite are inappropriate for apply in building materials.

Assessment of the surveillance system for adverse events following immunisation in the Gaza Strip: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In the occupied Palestinian territory, the expanded programme on immunisation (EPI) has successfully targeted 13 diseases through vaccination and achieved high population coverage. However, surveillance of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is inadequate in the Gaza Strip, as only post-BCG lymphadenitis is reported. This study assessed the adherence of health-care workers (HCWs) to the AEFI surveillance system in the Gaza Strip. METHODS: Data were collected by four methods: 105 HCWs answered a questionnaire; 24 health facilities completed a checklist enquiry; 17 medical health officers and information system managers from Ministry of Health (MOH) and UNRWA health centres and hospitals underwent in-depth interviews; and a focus group was held with 22 epidemiologists, stakeholders, consultants, and managers of the EPI. The 24 health facilities comprised seven MOH primary health-care centres (PHCs) providing vaccination, five MOH PHCs not providing vaccination, seven UNRWA PHCs, and the five hospitals of the Gaza Strip with paediatric departments. Data collected from June, 2015, to August, 2015, were analysed with SPSS version 19. Relationships among variables were assessed by independent t tests, chi squared tests and one-way ANOVA. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants, and written approval for the study was obtained from MOH and UNWRA directorates. FINDINGS: AEFI are reported infrequently; approximately half of the 105 HCWs (51%; 53) report AEFI, but there were conflicting views as to whom they should report. 65% (68) thought that they should report all AEFI. Participants' educational background, participation in workshops, and number of years of employment affected AEFI recognition and reporting. The majority (74%; 78) participate in immunisation workshops. There is an ineffective structure in MOH centres, and the UNRWA has a well-established internal system for reporting AEFI but a poor system for external reporting to the MOH epidemiology department. A lack of HCW awareness of responsibilities may also have a role. The majority of HCWs (95%; 100) reported a need for further training, and all reported a lack of cooperation or coordination between hospitals and PHCs regarding AEFI notification. All individuals (17) who were interviewed knew that they must report AEFI. A majority (65%; 11) stated no difficulties, whereas some (35%; six) reported difficulties due to absence of guidelines, protocols, or notification forms, and to fear of punishment. Focus group participants felt that all AEFI should be reported. They agreed that HCWs face obstacles such as fear of consequences, lack of knowledge and training, high workloads, not considering AEFI as related to immunisation, and absence or shortage of notification forms, protocols, and guidelines. Some felt that certain AEFI should be reported only to treating doctors, but all agreed that there is no cooperation or coordination among PHCs and between hospitals and PHCs regarding AEFI reporting. INTERPRETATION: Common themes may explain poor adherence of HCWs to AEFI surveillance. The system is ineffective in MOH centres, and UNRWA PHCs have well-established internal but poor external reporting systems. Absence of monitoring may have a role, and a lack of guidelines, protocols, and forms for reporting were mentioned by HCWs, medical health officers and information system managers, and the focus group. Some HCWs may not know their responsibilities (eg, to whom AEFI should be reported). Many other obstacles face HCWs, including fear of punishment and accountability. Therefore, HCWs must be encouraged to report adverse events without fear of penalty. In addition, lack of education on AEFI and lack of experience in identifying AEFI may affect reporting. Training of HCWs, development of guidelines and protocols, database construction and design, and monitoring of the AEFI surveillance system are highly recommended. FUNDING: WHO EMRO.