Characteristics and place of death in home care recipients in Germany - an analysis of nationwide health insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: Most care-dependent people live at home, where they also would prefer to die. Unfortunately, this wish is often not fulfilled. This study aims to investigate place of death of home care recipients, taking characteristics and changes in care settings into account. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of all home-care receiving people of a German statutory health insurance who were at least 65 years and who deceased between January 2016 and June 2019. Next to the care need, duration of care, age, sex, and disease, care setting at death and place of death were considered. We examined the characteristics by place of care, the proportion of dying in hospital by care setting and characterised the deceased cohort stratified by their actual place of death. RESULTS: Of 46,207 care-dependent people initially receiving home care, 57.5% died within 3.5 years (n = 26,590; mean age: 86.8; 66.6% female). More than half of those moved to another care setting before death with long-term nursing home care (32.3%) and short-term nursing home care (11.7%) being the most frequent transitions, while 48.1% were still cared for at home. Overall, 36.9% died in hospital and in-hospital deaths were found most often in those still receiving home care (44.7%) as well as care in semi-residential arrangements (43.9%) at the time of death. People who died in hospital were younger (mean age: 85.5 years) and with lower care dependency (low care need: 28.2%) as in all other analysed care settings. CONCLUSION: In Germany, changes in care settings before death occur often. The proportion of in-hospital death is particularly high in the home setting and in semi-residential arrangements. These settings should be considered in interventions aiming to decrease the number of unwished care transitions and hospitalisations at the end of life.

Socioeconomic position and risk of unplanned hospitalization among nursing home residents: a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequalities in health and healthcare use in old age have been on the rise during the past two decades. So far, it is unknown whether these inequalities have permeated the nursing home setting. This study aimed to assess whether the socioeconomic position of newly admitted nursing home residents had an influence on their risk of unplanned hospitalization. METHODS: We identified older persons (≥75 years) who were newly admitted to a nursing home between March 2013 and December 2014 using a set of linked routinely collected administrative and healthcare data in Sweden. The number of unplanned hospitalizations for any cause and the cumulative length of stay were defined as primary outcomes. Unplanned hospitalizations for potentially avoidable causes (i.e. fall-related injuries, urinary tract infections, pneumonia and decubitus ulcers) were considered as our secondary outcome. RESULTS: Among 40 545 newly admitted nursing home residents (mean age 86.8 years), the incidence rate of unplanned hospitalization ranged from 53.9 per 100 person-years among residents with tertiary education up to 55.1 among those with primary education. After adjusting for relevant confounders, we observed no meaningful difference in the risk of unplanned hospitalization according to the education level of nursing home residents (IRR for tertiary vs. primary education: 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00) or to their level of income (IRR for highest vs. lowest quartile of income: 0.98, 0.95-1.02). There were also no differences in the cumulative length of hospital stays or in the risk of experiencing unplanned hospitalizations for potentially avoidable causes. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, in this large cohort of newly admitted nursing home residents, we found no evidence of socioeconomic inequalities in the risk of unplanned hospitalization.

[Hospitalization of nursing home residents in the last phase of life: an analysis of health insurance data]. / Krankenhausaufenthalte von Pflegeheimbewohnern in der letzten Lebensphase: eine Analyse von Krankenkassenroutinedaten.

BACKGROUND: Compared to the international literature a higher proportion of German nursing home residents (NHR) die in hospital. Data on longer periods before death and on regional differences are not available. OBJECTIVE: The frequency of hospitalizations of NHR in different periods during their last year of life were investigated. Differences between age, sex, level of nursing care, dementia and federal states were also assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study used data of a large German health insurance fund and included NHR aged 65+ years who died between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014. We assessed the proportion of NHR with at least one hospitalization during different periods before death. In-depth analyses were conducted for 0 (which corresponds to in-hospital death), 28 and 365 days before death. RESULTS: Of the 67,328 deceased residents (mean age: 85.3 years, 69.8% female), 29.5% died in hospital. A total of 51.5% and 74.3% were hospitalized during the last 28 and 365 days of life, respectively. These values were higher in the eastern parts of Germany. Males were hospitalized more often than women in all time periods. A higher care dependency was associated with fewer hospitalizations, especially shortly before death. There was no noticeable difference in the frequency of hospitalization between NHR with and without dementia. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of all NHR in Germany are hospitalized during the last month of life and one third die in hospital, which is relatively high compared to the international literature. No major differences were found between NHR with and without dementia, which is also contradictory to international studies. Overall, there is a need to optimize palliative care for NHR in Germany.

Needs and availability of medical specialists' and allied health professionals' visits in German nursing homes: a cross-sectional study of nursing home staff.

BACKGROUND: The medical care for nursing home residents is estimated to be partly inadequate in Germany. The aim of this study is to investigate the needs and utilization of general practitioners (GPs), medical specialists and allied health professionals. METHODS: A survey was sent to a nationwide random sample of 1069 nursing homes in Germany in January 2019. Nursing staff managers were asked about medical care. Regular nursing home visits by medical specialists and allied health professionals were defined as at least one contact per year to at least one nursing home resident. RESULTS: A total of 486 persons responded (45.5%). On average, nursing homes have contact to 8.6 (interquartile range: 4-10) different GPs. Almost 70% of respondents agreed that residents' medical care should be coordinated by GPs. However, only 46.0% stated that specialist treatment should require GP referral. A high need was seen for care from physiotherapists (91.0%), neurologists or psychiatrists (89.3%), dentists (73.7%), and urologists (71.3%). Regarding the actual utilization of medical specialists and health professionals, most nursing homes have regular contact to physiotherapists (97.1%), psychiatrists or neurologists (90.4%), speech therapists (85.0%), and dentists (84.8%). Remarkable discrepancies between need and utilization were found for urologists and ophthalmologists. CONCLUSION: There is large variance in the number of GPs per nursing home, and needs for medical specialists, especially urologists and ophthalmologists, seem unmet. Interprofessional collaboration between GPs, medical specialists and allied health professionals should be improved, and GPs should play a more coordinating role.

The economic impact of epilepsy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In this review we aimed to determine the economic impact of epilepsy and factors associated with costs to individuals and health systems. METHODS: A narrative systematic review of incidence and case series studies with prospective consecutive patient recruitment and economic outcomes published before July 2014 were retrieved from Medline, Embase and PsycInfo. RESULTS: Of 322 studies reviewed, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and 14 were from high income country settings. The total costs associated with epilepsy varied significantly in relation to the duration and severity of the condition, response to treatment, and health care setting. Where assessed, 'out of pocket' costs and productivity losses were found to create substantial burden on households which may be offset by health insurance. However, populations covered ostensibly for the upfront costs of care can still bear a significant economic burden. CONCLUSIONS: Epilepsy poses a substantial economic burden for health systems and individuals and their families. There is uncertainty over the degree to which private health insurance or social health insurance coverage provides adequate protection from the costs of epilepsy. Future research is required to examine the role of different models of care and insurance programs in protecting against economic hardship for this condition, particularly in low and middle income settings.