Patterns of FIRST recurrence of stage IIIC1 endometrial cancer with no PARAAORTIC nodal assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rates and distribution of first recurrence in patients with FIGO stage IIIC1 endometrial cancer (EC) who did not undergo paraaortic dissection at surgical staging. METHODS: We retrospectively selected all (n = 207) stage IIIC1 patients treated at a single institution from 5/1993-1/2017. Sites of first recurrence were identified, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) calculated, multivariate logistic regression performed to identify factors associated with recurrence. RESULTS: Three-year DFS and OS were 66.5% and 85.7%, respectively. The most common histology was endometroid (64.2%). Three-year DFS was 81% (SE±3.8%) endometrioid vs. 39.5% (SE±6.6%) non-endometrioid (P < 0.001). Three-year OS was 96.9% (SE±1.8%) endometrioid vs. 65.6% (SE±6.7%) non-endometrioid (P < 0.001). Sixty-two (30.1%) patients recurred. Patterns of recurrence were: 14 (8.3%) multiple sites, 17 (8.2%) abdominal, 14 (6.8%) extra-abdominal, 17 (8.3%) isolated nodal (8 of these (3.9%) paraaortic). Patients with isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in lymph nodes only had 12/71 (17%) recurrence rate vs. 50/135 (37%) for patients with micro-/macrometastasis. On univariate analysis, grade (HR 4.67 95%CI 1.5-14.5, P = 0.008), histology (HR 4.9 95%CI 2.6-9.3, P < 0.001), myometrial invasion (HR 1.9 95%CI 1.04-3.5, P = 0.04), pelvic washing (HR 2.2 95%CI 1.1-4.5, P = 0.03), tumor volume in pelvic LNs (ITC vs. micro-/macrometastasis; HR 0.3 95%CI 0.2-0.7, P = 0.003) were associated with recurrence. On multivariate analysis, only histology was associated with recurrence (HR 7.88 95%CI 3.43-18.13, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated paraaortic recurrence in stage IIIC1 EC is uncommon. Micro-/macrometastasis were associated with twice the recurrence rate compared to ITC. These data will help clinicians counsel patients with stage IIIC1 EC regarding paraaortic assessment.

Economic Impact Among Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The life of a family caregiver changes in many ways when cancer is diagnosed. Changes regard also financial costs. To the authors' knowledge, little work has been done to estimate the costs associated with caregiving for cancer patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate for the first time in literature the economic changes among family caregivers of advanced ovarian cancer during the first-line treatment in an Italian survey. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2014, the primary family caregivers of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (N = 172) were recruited from to the Division of Gynecologic Oncology of the University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome within 4 weeks of the patient's new diagnosis. Caregivers reported demographic, medical information, and economic cost, such as traveling to and from medical appointments, waiting with patients for appointments, missing work, and attending to patients who are hospitalized. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and June 2014, 172 primary family caregivers of patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the study cohort was 54.01 years. They reported 3% of missing workdays. The mean cost for all caregivers was &OV0556;1,888,732 per year. Therefore, the mean cost for each caregiver was &OV0556;10,981 annually. CONCLUSIONS: This economic analysis of caregiving in patients with advanced ovarian cancer reports the significant burden that cancer treatment places on both families and society. These findings underscore the importance, when appropriate, of including valid estimates of the cost of informal caregiving when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of cancer treatments.