A Step Toward the Development of the First National Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework to Support Healthcare Decision Making in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of implementing multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and to select the criteria for preparing a national MCDA framework for health technology assessment of orphan drugs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). METHODS: The study was conducted in 3 phases. In phase I, a targeted literature review was performed to gather relevant information on the implementation of MCDA in healthcare decision making. Phase II was a cross-sectional survey, conducted to obtain insights from different stakeholders and key opinion leaders on specific topics from the KSA perspective. Phase III included a round-table discussion involving experts to validate the results obtained in the phase II survey and further elaborate on specific requirements that may be critical for developing the first national MCDA framework in the KSA. RESULTS: All the key opinion leaders involved in the study acknowledged the importance of implementing MCDA in the KSA. The Ministry of Health was assigned the responsibility of chairing the MCDA decision process. The experts selected the quantitative, qualitative, and economic criteria to be considered for the MCDA framework. The stakeholders decided to initiate a pilot phase using the deliberative MCDA methodology for the assessment of orphan drugs based on the selected criteria for a period of 1 year and then reevaluate the need to adapt the pragmatic MCDA model. CONCLUSION: This article describes the novel initiative that examined the feasibility and process required for the development of the first MCDA framework in the KSA to support healthcare decision making.

Assessment of safety and effectiveness of oral multiple sclerosis medication.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety profile of the new disease modifying drugs (fingolimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate) at a local hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort, where institutional review board approval was granted in December 2015. The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Demographic variables (age, gender, disease onset, and duration on medication), clinical variables (medication side effects and radiological findings), in addition to relapse frequency per year was collected. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients' records were retrieved from the pharmacy and included in the analysis. Eight patients were on teriflunomide, 5 patients on dimethyl fumarate and 44 patients on fingolimod were enrolled. The patients' average age was 32.5 years with female gender representing 63% the study population. Annual relapse rates were 0.24, 0.34, and 0.5 per patient per year for those taking fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide, correspondingly, lymphopenia (91.4%), neutropenia (23%), and bradycardia (16%) were the most reported side effects for fingolimod therapy. CONCLUSION: The study results were able to capture the effectiveness rate for the targeted treatment in the studied population, with the frequency of incidence of side effects. However, as these results cannot be generalized for the entire Saudi population.

Healthcare Disparities in Hispanic Diabetes Care: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Hispanics represent the largest minority group in the US. Research has shown that the ethnic minority especially Hispanics have a disproportionate burden of illness associated with diabetes mellitus. However, many have been focused on small sample sizes with potential selection bias. This study aims to examine the ethnicity disparity in health care utilization and expenditures between Hispanic and non-Hispanics after controlling for confounding variables. Cross-sectional with propensity score-matched design. The study revealed that Hispanics with diabetes had higher poverty rates, lower education, less physical activity, and less health care utilization/expenditures than did non-Hispanics. The assessment of ethnicity differences in health care is challenging because of the potential biases that require careful adjustment. This study successfully identified and controlled for confounding bias and concluded the Hispanics disparity in health care utilization still exists.