Satellite liver transplant centres significantly improve transplant assessment outcomes for patients with chronic liver disease but not hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Liver transplantation (LT) remains integral to the management of end-stage chronic liver disease (CLD). However, referral thresholds and assessment pathways remain poorly defined. Distance from LT centre has been demonstrated to impact negatively on patient outcomes resulting in the development of satellite LT centres (SLTCs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of SLTCs on LT assessment in patients with CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken including all patients with CLD or HCC assessed for LT at King's College Hospital (KCH) between October 2014 and October 2019. Referral location, social, demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to assess the impact of SLTCs on patients being accepted as LT candidates and contraindications being identified. Results: 1102 and 240 LT assessments were included for patients with CLD and HCC, respectively. MVA demonstrated significant associations with; patients living greater than 60 min from KCH/SLTCs and LT candidacy acceptance in CLD, and less deprived patients and LT candidacy acceptance in HCC. However, neither variable was associated with identification of LT contraindications. MVA demonstrated that referrals from SLTCs were more likely to result in acceptance of LT candidacy and less likely to result in a contraindication being identified in CLD. However, such associations were not demonstrated in HCC. Conclusion: SLTCs improve LT assessment outcomes in CLD but not HCC reflecting the standardised HCC referral pathway. Developing a formal regional LT assessment pathway across the UK would improve equity of access to transplantation.

The Last Year Before Graft Failure Negatively Impacts Economic Outcomes and is Associated With Greater Healthcare Resource Utilization Compared With Previous Years in the United Kingdom: Results of a Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Kidney and liver transplantation is the standard of care for end-stage renal or liver disease. However, long-term survival of kidney and liver grafts remain suboptimal. Our study aimed to understand the healthcare resources utilized and their associated costs in the years before graft failure. METHODS: Two noninterventional, retrospective, observational studies were conducted in cohorts of kidney or liver transplant patients. Once identified, patients were followed using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics databases from the date of transplantation to the date of the first graft failure. Total healthcare costs in the year before graft failure (primary endpoint) and during years 2-5 before graft failure (secondary endpoint) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 269 kidney and 81 liver transplant patients were analyzed. The mean total costs were highest for all resource components in the last year before graft failure, except for mean costs of immunosuppressive therapy per patient, which decreased slightly by index date (ie, graft failure). The mean total healthcare costs in the last year before graft failure were £8115 for kidney and £9988 for liver transplant patients and were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than years 2-5 before graft failure. Mean healthcare costs for years 2, 3, 4, and 5 before graft failure were £5925, £5575, £5469, and £5468, respectively, for kidney, and £6763, £7042, £6020, and £5651, respectively, for liver transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: Total healthcare costs in the last year before graft failure are substantial and statistically significantly higher than years 2-5 before graft failure, in both kidney and liver transplant patients. Our findings show the economic burden placed on healthcare services in the years before graft failure.