Pelvic Floor Disorders Among Minority Women: Differences in Prevalence, Severity and Health-Related Social Needs.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize prevalence and severity of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in various health care settings and to examine unmet health-related social needs (HRSN) among minority women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Minority women with PFDs were recruited from our academic urogynecology clinic, a general urology clinic at our institution's safety net hospital, and a community outreach mobile clinic. Questions from the Urinary Distress Index-6, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6, and Female Genitourinary Pain Index were used to identify patients with stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder (OAB), and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). RESULTS: Sixty-one (46.6%) women identified as Hispanic, 53 (40.4%) as Black, and 17 (12.9%) as Other. Overall, self-reported PFDs included stress urinary incontinence in 45%, OAB in 74.8%, and CPPS in 24.4% of women. Hispanic women were more likely to report OAB symptoms, compared to Black women (odds ratio (OR) 3.4 [1.2-10.2], P = .03) or Other women (OR = 5.1 [1.3-20.4], P = .02). Participants held a median of 5 unmet HRSN. Minority women facing issues with family and community support, transportation, and utilities were more likely to report CPPS symptoms, compared to those without psychosocial issues (support OR: 4.8 [1.7-13.7], P = .002; transportation OR: 2.0 [1.0-8.2], P = .05; utility OR: 7.0 [1.9-28.1], P = .005). CONCLUSION: Minority women with PFDs may have several unmet HRSNs which impact their ability to receive appropriate medical care. Our findings may assist in the development of effective strategies to improve health care outcomes for women dealing with PFDs.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in cost and postoperative complications following sacrocolpopexy in a US National Inpatient Database.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the association between socioeconomic factors, procedural costs, and postoperative complications among patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: The 2016-2017 US National Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify females > 18 years of age with an ICD10 diagnosis code of apical prolapse who received open or laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy. We analyzed relationships between socioeconomic factors, procedural costs, and postoperative complications in these patients. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to identify variables associated with increased complications and costs, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 4439 women who underwent sacrocolpopexy, of which 10.7% had complications. 34.6% of whites, 29.1% of Blacks, 29% of Hispanics, and 34% of Others underwent a laparoscopic/robotic procedure. Hispanic patients had the highest median charge associated with surgical admission for sacrocolpopexy at $51,768, followed by Other ($44,522), White ($43,471), and Black ($40,634) patients. Procedure being within an urban teaching hospital (+ $2602), laparoscopic/robotic (+ $6790), or in the West (+ $9729) were associated with a significantly higher median cost of surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing sacrocolpopexy, the protective factors against postoperative complications included private insurance status, a laparoscopic approach, and concurrent hysterectomy. Procedures held within an urban teaching hospital, conducted laparoscopically/robotically or in the West are associated with significantly higher costs of surgical management. Hispanic patients observe significantly higher procedure charges and costs, possibly resulting from the large number of this ethnic group living in the Western United States.

A Rapid Method to Preoperatively Assess Frailty for Older Patients with Pelvic Floor Conditions.

PURPOSE: Assessment of frailty can help surgeons predict perioperative risk and guide preoperative counseling. However, current methods are often cumbersome in the clinical setting. We prospectively compared the effectiveness of a rapid picture based Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS-9) assessed by patient and surgeon against reference standard Fried Frailty Index in older patients with pelvic floor conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 71 patients between March 2018 and June 2019. Frailty assessment using CFS-9 (scale ranging from very fit to terminally ill) was performed followed by the Fried Frailty Index, a validated tool of 5 measures (shrinking, physical energy, activity, grip strength, walking speed). Correlations and agreement between Fried Frailty Index and CFS-9 scores from the treating surgeon, a second surgeon (surgeon 2) and patient were analyzed using sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve and Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: The patient cohort was mostly female (97.2%), with a mean age (±SD) of 73.0 (±5.9) years and 23.9% were frail using the Fried Frailty Index. Compared to the Fried Frailty Index, CFS-9 scores of the treating surgeon, surgeon 2 and patient had AUC values (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.77-0.86), 0.91 (0.84-0.91) and 0.88 (0.79-0.88), respectively. As assessed by Cohen's Kappa the CFS-9 scores all had substantial (surgeon 2, Kappa 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.85 or moderate (all other CFS-9 measures, Kappa 0.44 to 0.58) agreement with the Fried Frailty Index scores. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid and effective validated tools to screen for frailty are needed in the clinical setting. CFS-9 is an excellent predictor of frailty compared to the Fried Frailty Index for patients with pelvic floor conditions.

"A National Study Demonstrating the Need for Improved Frailty Indices for Preoperative Risk Assessment of Common Urologic Procedures".

OBJECTIVE: To compare the associations between frailty indices and postoperative complications among older adults undergoing common urologic procedures. Frailty is known to be strongly associated with poor postoperative complications; however, the optimal way to measure frailty remains unknown. METHODS: We identified the 20 most common urologic procedures from 2013-2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Frailty was measured using the NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed with each index and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system with postoperative complications (any, major, or minor) as the outcomes. Statistical models were compared using the following fit parameters: area under the curve, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. RESULTS: A total of 158,855 procedures were identified. All frailty indices (NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index) and ASA were associated with increased odds for any, major, and minor complications (all P values <.001). ASA demonstrated stronger model fit parameters for any, major and minor complications compared to all other indices, with an area under the curve of 0.63, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively (all P values <.001). Adding ASA to each frailty index resulted in slight improvement of model fit parameters (P value <.001). CONCLUSION: ASA slightly outperforms current frailty indices in predicting postoperative complications among individuals undergoing commonly performed urologic procedures. Our findings highlight the need for improved frailty measures for preoperative risk assessment.