Impacts of a health literacy-informed intervention in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on hospitalization, health literacy, self-management, quality of life, and health costs - A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) and tailored health literacy (HL) follow-up with usual care on hospitalization, costs, HL, self-management, Quality of life (QOL), and psychological stress in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A RCT was undertaken in Norway between March 2018-December 2020 (n = 127). The control group (CG, n = 63) received usual care. The intervention group (IG, n = 64) received tailored HL follow-up from MI-trained COPD nurses with home visits for eight weeks and phone calls for four months after hospitalization. Primary outcomes were hospitalization at eight weeks, six months, and one year from baseline. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03216603) and analysed per protocol. RESULTS: Compared with the IG, the CG had 2.8 higher odds (95% CI [1.3 to 5.8]) of hospitalization and higher hospital health costs (MD=€ -6230, 95% CI [-6510 to -5951]) and lower QALYs (MD=0.1, 95% CI [0.10 to 0.11]) that gives an ICER = - 62,300. The IG reported higher QOL, self-management, and HL (p = 0.02- to <0.01). CONCLUSION: MI-trained COPD nurses using tailored HL follow-up is cost-effective, reduces hospitalization, and increases QOL, HL, and self-care in COPD. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Tailored HL follow-up is beneficial for individuals with COPD and the healthcare system.

How to co-design a health literacy-informed intervention based on a needs assessment study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a co-designed health literacy (HL)-informed intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that enables them to find, understand, remember, use and communicate the health information needed to promote and maintain good health. DESIGN: This study used a co-design approach informed by the programme logic of the Ophelia (Optimising Health Literacy and Access) process. The co-design included workshops where possible solutions for an HL-informed intervention were discussed based on an HL needs assessment study. SETTINGS: Five workshops were performed in a local community setting in the specialist and municipality healthcare services in Oslo, Norway. PARTICIPANTS: People with COPD, multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (HCPs) from the municipality and specialist healthcare services, and researchers (n=19) participated in the workshops. The co-designed HL-informed intervention was based on seven focus groups with people with COPD (n=14) and HCPs (n=21), and a cross-sectional study of people with COPD using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (n=69). RESULTS: The workshop co-design process identified 45 action points and 51 description points for possible intervention solutions to meet the HL needs of people with COPD. The final recommendation for an HL-informed intervention focused on tailored follow-up after hospitalisation, which uses motivational interviewing techniques, is based on the individual's HL, self-management and quality of life needs and is implemented in cooperation with HCPs in both the specialist and municipality healthcare services. CONCLUSION: During the codesign process, the workshop group generated several ideas for how to help patients find, understand, remember, use and communicate health information in order to promote and maintain good health. People with COPD need tailored follow-up based on their individual HL needs by HCPs that have knowledge of COPD and are able to motivate them for self-management tasks and help them to improve their quality of life (QOL) and decrease hospitalisation.

Does the Villalta scale capture the essence of postthrombotic syndrome? A qualitative study of patient experience and expert opinion.

BACKGROUND: The Villalta scale is recommended for diagnosing and grading of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) in clinical studies, but with limitations in specificity and sensitivity. OBJECTIVES: To explore the typical complaints of PTS through patients experience and expert opinion and relate this to the items of the Villalta scale. PATIENTS/METHODS: A qualitative study design with focus group interviews including patients with PTS and health care workers experienced in PTS patient care. RESULTS: Typical PTS complaints were reflected within four main domains: (a) agonizing discomforts; patients without venous ulcers often described other discomforts than pain; (b) skin changes; these were common and sometimes present before deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Except for venous ulcers, skin changes were considered of less importance; (c) fluctuating heaviness and swelling during the day and with activity; (d) post-DVT concerns; fear of DVT recurrence, health services failing to meet the patients' expectations, and psychological and social restrictions. These findings are not necessarily captured or well reflected in the Villalta scale. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the Villalta scale does not capture typical PTS complaints or their importance to the patients. A revision of the diagnosis and grading should be considered.

In-hospital cost comparison between percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation and surgery.

Objectives: Today, both surgical and percutaneous techniques are available for pulmonary valve implantation in patients with right ventricle outflow tract obstruction or insufficiency. In this controlled, non-randomized study the hospital costs per patient of the two treatment options were identified and compared. Methods: During the period of June 2011 until October 2014 cost data in 20 patients treated with the percutaneous technique and 14 patients treated with open surgery were consecutively included. Two methods for cost analysis were used, a retrospective average cost estimate (overhead costs) and a direct prospective detailed cost acquisition related to each individual patient (patient-specific costs). Results: The equipment cost, particularly the stents and valve itself was by far the main cost-driving factor in the percutaneous pulmonary valve group, representing 96% of the direct costs, whereas in the open surgery group the main costs derived from the postoperative care and particularly the stay in the intensive care department. The device-related cost in this group represented 13.5% of the direct costs. Length-of-stay-related costs in the percutaneous group were mean $3885 (1618) and mean $17 848 (5060) in the open surgery group. The difference in postoperative stay between the groups was statistically significant ( P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Given the high postoperative cost in open surgery, the percutaneous procedure could be cost saving even with a device cost of more than five times the cost of the surgical device.

Nursing intensity and costs of nurse staffing demonstrated by the RAFAELA system: liver vs. kidney transplant recipients.

AIM: To compare nursing intensity and nurse staffing costs for liver transplant (LTx) vs. kidney transplant (KTx) patients through the use of the RAFAELA system (the OPCq instrument). BACKGROUND: High-quality patient care correlates with the correct allocation of nursing staff. Valid systems for obtaining data on nursing intensity, in relation to actual patient care needs, are needed to ensure correct staffing. METHODS: A prospective, comparative study of 85 liver and 85 kidney transplant patients. Nursing intensity was calculated using the Oulu Patient Classification (OPCq) instrument. The cost per nursing intensity point was calculated by dividing annual total nursing wage costs with annual total nursing intensity points. RESULTS: The results showed significantly higher nursing intensity per day for liver transplant patients compared to kidney transplant patients. The length of stay was the most important variable in relation to nursing intensity points per day. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated differences in nursing intensity and nurse staffing costs between the two patient groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: When defending nurse staffing decisions, it is essential that nurse managers have evidence-based knowledge of nursing intensity and nurse staffing costs.

Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is used in specialized centers all over the world. However, laparoscopic liver resection has never been compared with open liver resection in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The Oslo-CoMet Study is a randomized trial into laparoscopic versus open liver resection for the surgical management of hepatic colorectal metastases. The primary outcome is 30-day perioperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes include 5-year survival (overall, disease-free and recurrence-free), resection margins, recurrence pattern, postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, and evaluation of the inflammatory response. A cost-utility analysis of replacing open surgery with laparoscopic surgery will also be performed. The study includes all resections for colorectal liver metastases, except formal hemihepatectomies, resections where reconstruction of vessels/bile ducts is necessary and resections that need to be combined with ablation. All patients will participate in an enhanced recovery after surgery program. A biobank of liver and tumor tissue will be established and molecular analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: After 35 months of recruitment, 200 patients have been included in the trial. Molecular and immunology data are being analyzed. Results for primary and secondary outcome measures will be presented following the conclusion of the study (late 2015). The Oslo-CoMet Study will provide the first level 1 evidence on the benefits of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrals.gov (NCT01516710) on 19 January 2012.

Perceived health after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: in-depth interviews of patients and next-of-kin.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is an alternative to open heart surgery in selected patients with pulmonary outflow tract disorder. The technique may reduce the number of open-chest surgeries in these patients. This study was conducted to understand how the patients and their next-of-kin experienced this new treatment option. DESIGN: Qualitative explorative design with individual in-depth interviews. SETTING: Oslo University Hospital, the only cardiac centre in Norway offering advanced surgical and interventional treatment to patient with congenital heart defects, serving the whole Norwegian population. PARTICIPANTS: During a 2-year period a total of 10 patients, median age 17 (7-30) and 18 next-of-kin were consecutively selected for individual in-depth interviews 3-6 months after the pulmonary valve implantation. The verbatim transcripts were analysed using a phenomenological methodology. RESULTS: Patients emphasised the importance of regaining independence and taking control of daily life shortly after the new interventional treatment. Renewed hope towards treatment options was described as 'a light in the tunnel'. Next-of-kin emphasised the importance both for the patient and their family of resuming normal life quickly after the procedure. The physical burden was experienced as minor after the minimally invasive intervention, compared to their previous experience with surgical procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The importance of maintaining normality in everyday life for a good family function. CONCLUSIONS: The repeated surgeries during infancy and adolescence of patients with congenital heart disease represent a heavy burden both for the patient and their family. All families especially emphasised the importance of resuming normal life quickly after each procedure. The novel technique of pulmonary valve implantation is thus a favourable approach because of minor interference in daily life.

The RAFAELA system: a workforce planning tool for nurse staffing and human resource management.

The RAFAELA system was developed in Finland during the 1990s to help with the systematic and daily measurement of nursing intensity (NI) and allocation of nursing staff. The system has now been rolled out across almost all hospitals in Finland, and implementation has started elsewhere in Europe and Asia. This article describes the system, which aims to uphold staffing levels in accordance with patients' care needs, and its structure, which consists of three parts: the Oulu Patient Classification instrument; registration of available nursing resources; and the Professional Assessment of Optimal Nursing Care Intensity Level method, as an alternative to classical time studies. The article also highlights the benefits of using a systematic measurement of NI.

Cost effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is an essential part of care for patients with end-stage renal disease. The introduction of laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (LLDN) has made live donation more advantageous because of less postoperative pain, earlier return to normal activities, and a consequent potential to increase the pool of kidney donors. However, the cost effectiveness of LLDN remains unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the health and cost consequences of replacing open-donor nephrectomy by LLDN. METHODS: Kidney donors were randomized to laparoscopic (n=63) or open surgery (n=59). We obtained data on operating time, personnel costs, length of stay, cost of analgesic, disposable instruments and complications, and indirect costs. Quality of life was captured before the operation and at 1, 6, and 12 months postdonation by means of short form-36. The scores were translated into utilities by means of Brazier's 6D algorithm. RESULTS: The cost per patient was U.S. $55,292 with laparoscopic and U.S. $29,886 with open surgery. The greatest cost difference was in costs attributed to complications (U.S. $33,162 vs. U.S. $4,573). The 1-year quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.780 and 0.765, respectively for laparoscopic and open surgery. This implies a cost of U.S. $1,693,733 per QALY at 12 months follow-up. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost of the major complications in the laparoscopic group and magnitude of QALY gain had the greatest impact on cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The LLDN is an attractive alternative because it, in general, entails less postoperative pain than open surgery, but it is cost effective only with relatively low rates of complications.