RESUMO
PURPOSE: Chest radiographs in critically ill patients can be difficult to interpret due to technical and clinical factors. We sought to determine the agreement of chest radiographs and CT scans, and the inter-observer variation of chest radiograph interpretation, in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: Chest radiographs and corresponding thoracic computerised tomography (CT) scans (as reference standard) were collected from 45 ICU patients. All radiographs were analysed by 20 doctors (radiology consultants, radiology trainees, ICU consultants, ICU trainees) from 4 different centres, blinded to CT results. Specificity/sensitivity were determined for pleural effusion, lobar collapse and consolidation/atelectasis. Separately, Fleiss' kappa for multiple raters was used to determine inter-observer variation for chest radiographs. RESULTS: The median sensitivity and specificity of chest radiographs for detecting abnormalities seen on CTs scans were 43.2% and 85.9% respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity for pleural effusion was significantly higher among radiology consultants but no specialty/experience distinctions were observed for specificity. Median inter-observer kappa coefficient among assessors was 0.295 ("fair"). CONCLUSIONS: Chest radiographs commonly miss important radiological features in critically ill patients. Inter-observer agreement in chest radiograph interpretation is only "fair". Consultant radiologists are least likely to miss thoracic radiological abnormalities. The consequences of misdiagnosis by chest radiographs remain to be determined.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Radiografia Torácica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Radiografia Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Terminal , IdosoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare elderly (≥ 80 yr), older (65-79 yr), and younger (< 65 yr) ICU admissions in Scotland in relation to trends in admission rates, regional variation in admissions, ICU treatment intensity, and ICU and 1-year mortality. DESIGN: National 5-year cohort study of ICU first admissions (January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2009). SETTING: All admissions to ICUs and combined units (level 2/3 care) in Scotland captured by the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group database, linked with hospital discharge data and death records. PATIENTS: A total of 40,142 patients: 3,865 were 80 years old or older (9.6%), 13,904 (34.6%) were 65-79 years old; and 22,373 were younger than 65 years (55.7%). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2009, elderly admission rates decreased from 36.6/10,000 (95% CI, 34.0-39.2) in 2005 to 28.7/10,000 (95% CI, 26.5-30.9) in 2009 (p < 0.001; relative decrease, 22.0%); older admission rates also decreased, but less steeply (31.1 [95% CI, 29.9-32.2] to 26.1 [95% CI, 25.1-27.1] per 10,000 population; p < 0.001; relative decrease, 16.1%). Rates were static for younger patients. Restricted to mechanically ventilated elderly patients, rates ranged from 13.9 to 30.1/10,000 between healthboard administrative regions (p < 0.001). Emergency surgical diagnoses were more prevalent for elderly patients (elderly, 39.8%; older, 25.1%; younger, 20.3%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses limited to pneumonia admissions (elderly, n = 242; older, n = 1,226; younger, n = 1,836) indicated similar acute physiology scores, but fewer preexisting comorbidities among elderly patients (p = 0.007), who received a shorter duration of organ support and ICU stay. Mortality rates were higher in elderly patients at ICU discharge (elderly, 26.5%; older, 25.0%; younger, 17.0%; p < 0.001; confounder adjusted odds ratio elderly vs younger, 2.33 [95% CI, 2.11-2.58]; p < 0.001). Differences persisted at 1 year (elderly, 52.2%; older, 43.8%; younger, 27.6%; adjusted odds ratio elderly vs younger, 3.72 [95% CI, 3.42-4.06]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Scotland, elderly and older ICU admission rates are decreasing, with regional geographic variation. Although limited by an absence of a measure of frailty, patient characteristics and treatment intensity suggest selection of less comorbid elderly patients, indicating possible rationing based on chronologic age.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , EscóciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is increasingly used during the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), outperforming blood markers during investigation in children. Tests that reduce endoscopy rates in children with suspected gut inflammation would be beneficial. We aimed to determine the usefulness of FC in children undergoing their primary investigation for suspected IBD by systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: An electronic search was performed with keywords relating to IBD and calprotectin in multiple electronic resources from 1946 to May 2012; a hand search was also performed. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported FC levels before the endoscopic investigation of IBD in patients less than 18 years old. Studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, and a meta-analysis was performed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating curve model. RESULTS: Eight papers met the inclusion criteria (six prospective and two retrospective case-control studies); methodological quality was determined in detail for each study. The 8 studies presented FC levels at presentation in 715 patients, 394 pediatric IBD patients, and 321 non-IBD controls. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for the diagnostic utility of FC during the investigation of suspected pediatric IBD were 0.978 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.947-0.996) and 0.682 (95% CI, 0.502-0.863), respectively; the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.07 and 0.03, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FC has a high sensitivity and a modest specificity during the diagnosis of suspected pediatric IBD. Further work is required to determine the effect of FC levels on endoscopy rates and its role during the re-evaluation of those with confirmed disease.