Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(5)2017 May 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28473405

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize changes in statin utilization patterns in patients newly initiated on therapy in the 2 years following the release of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol management guideline in a large US health plan population. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective, observational study used administrative medical and pharmacy claims data to identify patients newly initiated on statin therapy over 4 quarters prior to and 8 quarters following the release of the guideline (average N/quarter=3596). Patients were divided into the 4 statin benefit groups (SBGs) based on risk factors and laboratory lipid levels as defined in the guideline: SBG1 (with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD]; N=1046/quarter), SBG2 (without ASCVD, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL; N=454/quarter), SBG3 (without ASCVD, aged 40-75 years, with diabetes mellitus, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 70-189 mg/dL; N=1391/quarter), SBG4 (no ASCVD or diabetes mellitus, age 40-75 years, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 70-189 mg/dL, estimated 10-year ASCVD risk of ≥7.5%; N=705/quarter). Demographic variables, statin utilization patterns, lipid levels, and comorbidities were analyzed for pre- and postguideline periods. Postguideline, gradually increased high-intensity statin initiation occurred in SBG1, SBG2, and in SBG3 patients with 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%. Moderate- to high-intensity statin initiation gradually increased among SBG4 patients. Recommended-intensity statin choice changed to a greater degree among patients treated by specialty care physicians. Regarding sex, target-intensity statin initiation was lower in women in all groups before and after guideline release. CONCLUSIONS: Prescriber implementation of the guideline recommendations has gradually increased, with the most marked change in the increased initiation of high-intensity statins in patients with ASCVD and in those treated by a specialist.


Assuntos
American Heart Association , Cardiologia/tendências , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Colesterol/sangue , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Seguro Saúde/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Biomarcadores/sangue , Cardiologia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/sangue , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Seguro Saúde/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Fatores de Proteção , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 119(3): 410-415, 2017 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27890243

RESUMO

High triglyceride (TG) levels among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are associated with higher medical costs. We analyzed the economic impact of TG-lowering therapies and whether the association between medical costs and therapy differed according to TG reduction. We conducted an observational cohort study of 184,932 patients with diabetes mellitus who had a TG measurement between January 2012 and June 2013 and a second TG measurement 3 to 15 months later. We identified 4 therapy groups (statin monotherapy, TG-specific monotherapy, statin/TG-specific combination therapy, or no therapy) and stratified those groups by percent change in TG (increased ≥5%, change of ≤4.9%, decreased 5% to 29%, decreased ≥30%). We compared change in medical costs between the year before and after therapy, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 184,932 total patients, 143,549 (77.6%) received statin monotherapy, 900 (0.5%) received TG-specific monotherapy, 1,956 (1.1%) received statin and TG-specific combination therapy, and 38,527 (20.8%) received no prescription lipid agents. After covariate adjustment, statin/TG-specific agent recipients had a mean 1-year total cost reduction of $1,110. The greatest cost reduction was seen among statin/TG-specific combination therapy patients who reduced TG levels by ≥30% (-$2,859). Statin monotherapy patients who reduced TG by ≥30% also had a large reduction in adjusted costs (-$1,079). In conclusion, we found a substantial economic benefit to treating diabetic patients with statin/TG-specific combination lipid therapy compared with monotherapy of either type or no lipid pharmacotherapy. A TG reduction of ≥30% produced a particularly large reduction in 1-year medical costs.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertrigliceridemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Idoso , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Ácidos Fíbricos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/complicações , Hipercolesterolemia/economia , Hipertrigliceridemia/complicações , Hipertrigliceridemia/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Niacina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Triglicerídeos/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA