Assessment of functional sit-to-stand muscle power: Cross-sectional trajectories across the lifespan.

BACKGROUND: The 30-s sit-to-stand (STS) muscle power test is a valid test to assess muscle power in older people; however, whether it may be used to assess trajectories of lower-limb muscle power through the adult lifespan is not known. This study evaluated the pattern and time course of variations in relative, allometric and specific STS muscle power throughout the lifespan. METHODS: Subjects participating in the Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study (729 women and 576 men; aged 20 to 93 years) were included. Lower-limb muscle power was assessed with the 30-s version of the STS muscle power test. Allometric, relative and specific STS power were calculated as absolute STS power normalized to height squared, body mass and leg lean mass as assessed by DXA, respectively. RESULTS: Relative STS muscle power tended to increase in women (0.08 ±â€¯0.05 W·kg-1·yr-1; p = 0.082) and increased in men (0.14 ±â€¯0.07 W·kg-1·yr-1; p = 0.046) between 20 and 30 years, followed by a slow decline (-0.05 ±â€¯0.05 W·kg-1·yr-1 and -0.06 ±â€¯0.08 W·kg-1·yr-1, respectively; both p > 0.05) between 30 and 50 years. Then, relative STS power declined at an accelerated rate up to oldest age in men (-0.09 ±â€¯0.02 W·kg-1·yr-1) and in women until the age of 75 (-0.09 ±â€¯0.01 W·kg-1·yr-1) (both p < 0.001). A lower rate of decline was observed in women aged 75 and older (-0.04 ±â€¯0.02 W·kg-1·yr-1; p = 0.039). Similar age-related patterns were noted for allometric and specific STS power. CONCLUSIONS: The STS muscle power test appears to provide a feasible and inexpensive tool to monitor cross-sectional trajectories of muscle power throughout the lifespan.

Physical activity assessment in the general population; validated self-report methods.

Self-reported questionnaires have been commonly used to assess physical activity levels in large cohort studies. As a result, strong and convincing evidences that physical activity can protect health are widely recognized. However, validation studies using objective measures of physical activity or energy expenditure (double labelled water, accelerometers, pedometers, etc.) indicate that the accuracy and precision of survey techniques are limited. Physical activity questionnaires could fail in estimating particularly non-vigorous physical activity. They have a disproportionate focus on volitional type exercise (i.e. biking, jogging, and walking), while not capturing the activities of daily living and low to moderate intensity movements. Energy expenditure estimates from these data are not recommended. On the other hand, despite objective tools should be the measurement of choice to assess PA level, self-reported questionnaires remain valid, and have many advantages. i.e. low costs. These kind of recalls are designed and validated for different age groups and provide value and important information, mainly about physical activity pattern. Future studies will require more precision and accuracy in physical activity measurement than those provided by traditional survey methods. We can conclude that probably a mixed approach that combines both the objective and subjective techniques involving novel devices and electronic capture of physical activity questionnaires will be more effective.

Los cuestionarios auto-administrados han sido comúnmente utilizados en los estudios con grandes cohortes con el fin de evaluar la actividad física de sus participantes. Como consecuencia de ello, existe una considerable cantidad de evidencias científicas sobre el efecto protector de la actividad física sobre la salud. Sin embargo, los estudios de validación que utilizan métodos objetivos para la cuantificación de la actividad física o el gasto energético (el agua doblemente marcada, los acelerómetros, los podómetros, etc.) indican que la precisión de los cuestionarios es limitada. Los cuestionarios de actividad física pueden fallar especialmente al estimar la actividad física no vigorosa, y suelen centrarse de forma desproporcionada en los tipos de ejercicios planificados (ir en bicicleta, correr, andar,…), mientras que no suelen recoger las actividades de la vida diaria y movimientos de intensidad más moderada no planificada. La estimación del gasto energético a partir de estos datos no es recomendable. Por otro lado, y a pesar de que los métodos objetivos deberían de ser la primera elección a la hora de evaluar la actividad física, los cuestionarios se mantienen como herramientas válidas y con muchas ventajas, una de ellas, el bajo coste. Este tipo de instrumentos están específicamente diseñados y validados para diferentes grupos de edad y proporcionan información valiosa e importante, sobre todo, del patrón de actividad física. Los futuros estudios requieren de más precisión a la hora de medir la actividad física respecto a la que proporcionan los cuestionarios. Podemos concluir que probablemente un método mixto que combine los métodos objetivos y subjetivos y que incluya nuevos sistemas y registros electrónicos sería lo recomendable.

Physical activity assessment in the general population; instrumental methods and new technologies.

The objective measurement of human movement and the quantification of energy expenditure due to physical activity is an identified need in both research and the clinical setting. Validated and well-defined reference methods (double labelled water, direct calorimetry, indirect calorimetry) are expensive and mostly limited to the laboratory setting. Therefore, in the last years, several objective measurement devices have been developed which are appropriate for field studies and clinical settings. There is no gold standard among them, as all have limitations. Pedometers are small, non-expensive, count the steps taken and give information on total physical activity, but not about physical activity patterns and behaviour. Accelerometers are expensive, save information about frequency and intensity of physical activity, but not about type of physical activity. Both pedometers and accelerometers only save information about lower body movement, but reliability about the estimation of energy expenditure is limited. Heart rate monitoring relates intensity to energy expenditure, but gives no information about physical activity. GPS watches are portable, relatively inexpensive, non-invasive and provide distance, speed, and elevation with exact time and location, but are maybe limited for the assessment of brief higher speed movement and energy expenditure. Combined motion sensors combine accelerometry with the measurement of physiological variables and share advantages of single devices and are more precise. Manufacturer software which applies activity-specific algorithms for the calculation of energy expenditure can affect energy expenditure results. Most of the devices estimate energy expenditure more accurately at light to moderate intensities; underestimation increases at very light and higher intensity activities.

La medición objetiva del movimiento humano y la cuantificación del gasto energético debido a la actividad física es una necesidad identificada tanto en investigación como en clínica. Los métodos de referencia validados y bien definidos (el agua doblemente marcada, la calorimetría directa, la calorimetría indirecta) son caros y prácticamente se limitan a la investigación en el laboratorio. Por lo tanto, en los últimos años, se han desarrollado diferentes dispositivos de medición objetiva que son apropiados para los estudios de campo y clínicos. No hay ningún estándar de oro entre ellos, ya que todos tienen limitaciones. Los podómetros son ligeros, poco costosos, cuentan los pasos y aportan información sobre la actividad física total, pero no sobre el comportamiento y los patrones de actividad física. Los acelerómetros son caros, aportan información sobre patrón, frecuencia e intensidad de la actividad física, pero no sobre el tipo de actividad física. Los podómetros y acelerómetros únicamente recogen información sobre el movimiento del movimiento corporal, pero la validez en la estimación del gasto energético es limitada. La monitorización de la frecuencia cardíaca relaciona intensidad del ejercicio con gasto de energía, pero no aporta información sobre la actividad física. Los dispositivos GPS son portátiles, relativamente asequibles, no invasivos y recogen distancia, velocidad y elevación con hora y lugar exactos, pero quizás estén limitados para la evaluación de movimientos cortos de alta intensidad y elevado gasto energético. Los dispositivos de última generación combinan acelerometría con la medición de variables fisiológicas, comparten las ventajas de los dispositivos individuales y son más precisos. Para el cálculo del gasto energético se aplican algoritmos específicos de la actividad incluidos en el software del fabricante que pueden afectar a los resultados. La mayoría de los dispositivos estiman con mayor precisión el gasto energético a intensidades ligeras y moderadas, pero subestiman el gasto a intensidades muy ligeras y de mayor intensidad.

Harmonization process and reliability assessment of anthropometric measurements in the elderly EXERNET multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: The elderly EXERNET multi-centre study aims to collect normative anthropometric data for old functionally independent adults living in Spain. PURPOSE: To describe the standardization process and reliability of the anthropometric measurements carried out in the pilot study and during the final workshop, examining both intra- and inter-rater errors for measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 98 elderly from five different regions participated in the intra-rater error assessment, and 10 different seniors living in the city of Toledo (Spain) participated in the inter-rater assessment. We examined both intra- and inter-rater errors for heights and circumferences. RESULTS: For height, intra-rater technical errors of measurement (TEMs) were smaller than 0.25 cm. For circumferences and knee height, TEMs were smaller than 1 cm, except for waist circumference in the city of Cáceres. Reliability for heights and circumferences was greater than 98% in all cases. Inter-rater TEMs were 0.61 cm for height, 0.75 cm for knee-height and ranged between 2.70 and 3.09 cm for the circumferences measured. Inter-rater reliabilities for anthropometric measurements were always higher than 90%. CONCLUSION: The harmonization process, including the workshop and pilot study, guarantee the quality of the anthropometric measurements in the elderly EXERNET multi-centre study. High reliability and low TEM may be expected when assessing anthropometry in elderly population.