The Assessment of the Diagnostic Delay in Japanese People with Parkinson's Disease Using a Web-based Survey of Patients and Physicians.

Objective Although diagnostic criteria of Parkinson's disease (PD) have been established, the details of the process by which patients notice symptoms, visit a physician, and receive a diagnosis of PD is unclear. We therefore explored factors influencing latency in diagnosing PD. Methods We performed an internet-based survey of patients with PD and their families as well as physicians treating patients with PD to identify any diagnostic latency and its determinants. Evaluated factors included motor and non-motor symptoms, the diagnosis history and symptoms, patients' feelings toward PD prior to the diagnosis, and physician-determined reasons for the diagnostic delay. Results Among the 186 eligible patient respondents (including 87 responses from family members of patients), 24% received a PD diagnosis >1 year after the onset of PD-related symptoms, 58.6% had mid- or late-stage PD at the diagnosis, and 29% of patients had initially thought their symptoms were common age-related phenomena. Tremor (42%) was the most frequent symptom that led patients to visit a medical institution, whereas gait disturbance (14%) was the least frequent. More patients diagnosed with early-stage PD than those diagnosed with mid- or late-stage PD consulted a neurologist at their first visit. Among the 331 eligible physicians, patients' misinterpretation of their symptoms as being age-related was deemed one of or the most common cause (s) of a diagnostic delay by 67% and 36%, respectively. Conclusion Patients' insufficient or misinterpreted information about PD may cause delays in accessing healthcare services, leading to diagnostic delay.

Adherence to treatment guideline recommendations for Parkinson's disease in Japan: A longitudinal analysis of a nationwide medical claims database between 2008 and 2016.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to the 2011 Japanese guidelines for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) in real-life practice is unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective longitudinal observational study, we examined patterns and trends in anti-PD drug prescriptions in 20,936 patients (≥30 years of age with newly diagnosed PD [International Classification of Diseases-Tenth code G20 or PD Hoehn and Yahr scale 1-5] and one or more prescriptions) using nationwide registry data between 2008 and 2016. Data are presented as descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Half (49.6%) of the patients received levodopa (L-dopa) monotherapy, followed by non-ergot dopamine agonists (DA) prescribed as monotherapy (8.3%) or with L-dopa (8.1%). Consistent with the guidelines, 75% of patients were prescribed within 13 days of initial diagnosis; L-dopa monotherapy was the most prescribed drug in patients ≥70 years of age, whereas non-ergot DA monotherapy was more likely to be prescribed than L-dopa in patients between 30 and 50 years of age. Inconsistent with the guidelines, L-dopa monotherapy was the most prescribed drug in patients between 51 and 69 years of age. Over the course of 4 years of treatment, the prescription rate of L-dopa monotherapy and non-ergot DA monotherapy decreased by 63.7% and 44.1%, respectively, whereas that of L-dopa and non-ergot DA combination therapy increased by 103.7%. Combination therapy with L-dopa, non-ergot DA, and monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors was gradually increased at a later stage. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that the state of PD treatment in Japan adheres to most of the recommendations in the 2011 national guidelines, but also precedes the 2018 guidelines.