The Role of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Atrial Fibrillation: Treatment Management Based on Patient and Drug Characteristics.

Data from Turkey revealed that atrial fibrillation patient percentage under adequate anti- coagulation in Turkey is less than that in other countries due to multiple parameters such as treatment adherence problems, failure to follow guideline recommendations, negative perspective on the use of new drugs, drug costs, and payment conditions. The aim of this article is to provide physicians with a compiled resource that focuses on the differences between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and heterogeneity of atrial fibrilla- tion patients by reviewing the global and national data from a multidisciplinary perspective and provide guidance on the choice of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients. A gastroenterologist, 2 neurologists, and 11 cardiologists from university and training and research hospitals in Turkey who are experienced in atrial fibrillation and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments gathered in 3 separate meetings to identify the review topics and evaluate the outcomes of the systematic literature search. Based on the pharmacological characteristics, clinical studies, and real-world data compari- sons, it has been revealed that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are not similar. Thromboembolism and bleeding risks, renal and hepatic functions, coexisting conditions, and concomitant drug usage have been shown to affect the levels of benefits gained from non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients. Although Turkish patients with atrial fibrillation have been observed to be younger, they are more likely to have coexisting cardiovascular conditions compared to the atrial fibrillation patients in other countries. Selection of an appropriate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in line with the available evidence and recent guidelines will provide substantial benefits to atrial fibrillation patients.

Cost-of-disease of Heart Failure in Turkey: A Delphi Panel-based Analysis of Direct and Indirect Costs.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is considered a significant public health issue with a substantial and growing epidemiologic and economic burden in relation to longer life expectancy and aging global population. Aims: To determine cost-of-disease of heart failure (HF) in Turkey from the payer perspective. Study Design: Cross-sectional cost of disease study. Methods: In this cost-of-disease study, annual direct and indirect costs of management of HF were determined based on epidemiological, clinical and lost productivity inputs provided by a Delphi panel consisted of 11 experts in HF with respect to ejection fraction (EF) status (HF patients with reduced EF (HFrEF), mid-range EF (HFmrEF) and preserved EF (HFpEF)) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. Direct medical costs included cost items on outpatient management, inpatient management, medications, and non-pharmaceutical treatments. Indirect cost was calculated based on the lost productivity due to absenteeism and presenteeism. Results: 51.4%, 19.5%, and 29.1% of the patients were estimated to be HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF patients, respectively. The total annual direct medical cost per patient was $887 and non-pharmaceutical treatments ($373, 42.1%) were the major direct cost driver. Since an estimated nationwide number of HF patients is 1,128,000 in 2021, the total annual national economic burden of HF is estimated to be $1 billion in 2021. The direct medical cost was higher in patients with HFrEF than in those with HFmrEF or HFpEF ($1,147 vs. $555 and $649, respectively). Average indirect cost per patient was calculated to be $3,386 and was similar across HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF groups, but increased with advanced NYHA stage. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the substantial economic burden of HF in terms of both direct and indirect costs and indicate that the non-pharmaceutical cost is the major direct medical cost driver in HF management, regardless of the EF status of HF patients.

[Increased myocardial energy expenditure in cardiac syndrome X: More work, more pain]. / Kardiyak sendrom X'li hastalarda artmis miyokart enerji tüketimi: Çok is, çok agri.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the myocardial energy expenditure (MEE) in patients with cardiac syndrome X (CSX) and to examine its association with exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. METHODS: A total of 99 patients who underwent coronary angiography and who were diagnosed as having normal coronary arteries were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on symptoms and exercise ECG parameters: 56 CSX patients and 43 control patients with a negative stress test. MEE was calculated using transthoracic echocardiography-derived parameters: circumferential end-systolic stress, left ventricular ejection time, and stroke volume. RESULTS: In patients with CSX, the MEE at rest was 28% higher in than the control group (89.2±36.3 vs. 69.8±17.2 cal/minute). Correlation analysis revealed a moderately negative correlation between MEE and the Duke treadmill score (DTS) (ß:-0.456; p<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with a cut-off value of 74.6 cal/minute for MEE had a sensitivity of 78.1% and a specificity of 75.3% for the prediction of CSX (area under the curve: 0.872; p<0.001). An extra 1 calorie spent per minute at rest increased the likelihood of CSX by about 86% (odds ratio: 1.863). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that MEE was greater in CSX patients compared with a control group. Increased MEE was determined to be an independent predictor of CSX. DTS was inversely correlated with MEE. Increased MEE may have a crucial role in CSX pathophysiology.

Cost of heart failure management in Turkey: results of a Delphi Panel.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze health-related cost of heart failure (HF) and to evaluate health-related source utilization aiming to provide data on the economic burden of HF in actual clinical practice in Turkey. METHODS: The study used the Delphi process of seeking expert consensus of opinion including 11 cardiologists who are experienced in HF. The standardized questionnaire comprised items to reflect the opinion of the expert panelists on the distribution of the HF patients in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics and background disease states. Costs related to out-patient follow-up, in-patient follow-up, medications, and other therapies were also evaluated. RESULTS: 34.1% of the HF patients were in the age range of 60-69 years, and 62.3% were males. Coronary heart disease was the leading cause of HF (59.6%); 63.6% of the HF patients had reduced ejection fraction (rEF) and 42.3% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA)-II class. Approximately 75 % of the patients were followed up by a cardiology unit. The total annual visit number was estimated as 3.41. Approximately 32% of HF patients were hospitalized 1.64 times a year, for an average of 6.77 days each time. The total annual costs of all HF patients and HF-rEF patients were estimated as 1.537 TL and as 2.141 TL, respectively. CONCLUSION: The analysis demonstrating the magnitude of the economic impact of HF management on Turkey's healthcare system may help facilitate health and social policy interventions to improve the prevention and treatment of HF.