Prevalence, associated risk factors; and patient and economic impact of multiple sensory impairment in a multi-ethnic elderly population in Singapore: the PIONEER study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence, risk factors; and impact on patient health and economic outcomes across the laterality spectrum of multiple sensory impairment (MSI) in a multi-ethnic older Asian population. METHODS: In this population-based study of Singaporeans aged ≥ 60 years, MSI was defined as concomitant vision (visual acuity > 0.3 logMAR), hearing (pure-tone air conduction average > 25 dB), and olfactory (score < 12 on the Sniffin' Sticks test) impairments across the spectrum of laterality (any, unilateral, combination [of unilateral and bilateral], and bilateral). RESULTS: Among 2,057 participants (mean ± SD 72.2 ± 0.2 years; 53.1% female), the national census-adjusted prevalence rates of any, unilateral, combination, and bilateral MSI were 20.6%, 1.2%, 12.2%, and 7.2%, respectively. Older age, male gender, low socioeconomic status (SES), and smoking (all p < 0.05) were independently associated with higher likelihood of any MSI. Compared to those with no sensory loss, those with MSI had significantly decreased mobility (range 5.4%-9.2%), had poor functioning (OR range 3.25-3.45) and increased healthcare costs (range 4-6 folds) across the laterality spectrum. Additionally, bilateral MSI had a significant decrease in HRQoL (5.5%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: MSI is a highly prevalent medical condition, with 1 in 5; and almost 1 in 10 community-dwelling older Asians having any and bilateral MSI, respectively, with a higher likelihood in men, smokers, and those with low SES. Critically, MSI has a substantial negative impact on patient health and economic outcomes across the laterality spectrum. Sensory testing is critical to detect and refer individuals with MSI for management to improve their functional independence and QoL.

The longitudinal psychological, physical activity, and financial impact of a COVID-19 lockdown on older adults in Singapore: The PIONEER-COVID population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Several countries have implemented 'lockdown' measures to curb the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AIMS: To examine the psychological, physical activity (PA), and financial impact of a 2-month COVID-19 lockdown on older adults aged ≥60 years in Singapore, and to identify factors associated with adverse lockdown-related outcomes. METHOD: We interviewed 496 community-dwelling adults (mean age [standard deviation]: 73.8 [7.6] years; 54.8% female) during the lockdown who had previously participated in a population-based epidemiological study. Validated questionnaires were utilised to assess loneliness and depressive symptoms at both timepoints, while inhouse questionnaires were used to assess PA and financial difficulty during lockdown. Multivariable regression models determined the lockdown-related change in loneliness and depression scores, and the factors associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Loneliness increased significantly during the lockdown period (p < 0.001) while depressive symptoms decreased (p = 0.022). Decreased PA, greater financial problems, male gender, Indian ethnicity, living alone, having a greater body mass index and perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 were all associated with worsening loneliness scores. A total of 36.9% and 19.6% participants reported decreased PA and had financial problems during the lockdown, respectively. Unemployment was associated with decreased PA, while self-employed individuals, cleaners, retail workers and smokers had greater odds of experiencing financial difficulty. CONCLUSION: Despite a decrease in depressive symptoms, our population of older Asians reported a significant increase in loneliness and decreased PA, with one-fifth experiencing financial problems during lockdown. Our data suggest that more targeted public health efforts are needed to reduce repercussions of future lockdowns.

Association Between Perceived Barriers to Diabetes Self-management and Diabetic Retinopathy in Asian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Importance: A patient's perceived barriers to diabetes self-management (DSM) may affect his or her risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR); however, few studies have examined this association. Objective: To examine the association between perceived barriers to DSM and the severity spectrum of DR in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional clinic-based study, the Singapore Diabetes Management Project, was conducted from December 28, 2010, to March 20, 2013, at the Singapore National Eye Centre, a tertiary eye care institute. After excluding patients with type 1 diabetes and ungradable fundus images, 361 participants were included in the analyses. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 20 to September 8, 2017. Exposure: The degree of perceived barriers to DSM was assessed using a 23-item questionnaire comprising items about knowledge of DSM, access to care, and confidence in health care professionals. Rasch analysis was used to optimize the scale's psychometric properties, with lower scores indicating a higher degree of self-perceived barriers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diabetic retinopathy was graded from 2-field retinal images into categories of no DR (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study levels 10-15; n = 154), mild to moderate DR (levels 20-43; n = 112), and severe DR (levels ≥53 and/or presence of clinically significant macular edema; n = 95) using the modified Airlie House classification system of DR. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the association between perceived barriers and severity of DR in the worse-affected eye. Results: Among the 361 participants (105 women and 256 men; mean [SD] age, 57 [8] years), a greater magnitude of perceived barriers to DSM was independently associated with higher odds of having any DR (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66), mild to moderate DR (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.68), and severe DR (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.03-1.79). This association was independent of diabetes control (hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and lipid levels), presenting visual acuity, and socioeconomic indicators. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that greater perceived barriers to DSM are independently associated with severity of DR. Although longitudinal data are needed, these findings suggest that evidence-based interventions to reduce patient-, practitioner-, and system-related barriers to diabetes care may help reduce the risk of DR.