Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Consensus on Spanish Nomenclature for Spondyloarthritis. / Consenso ASAS en nomenclatura en español para las espondiloartritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus to standardize the use of Spanish terms, abbreviations and acronyms in the field of spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: An international task force comprising all native Spanish-speaking Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) members, the executive committee of Grupo para el estudio de la Espondiloartritis de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología (GRESSER), two methodologists, two linguists from the Real Academia Nacional de Medicina de España (RANM) and two patients from the Spanish Coordinator of Spondylitis Associations (CEADE) was established. A literature review was performed to identify the conflicting terms/abbreviations/acronyms in SpA. This review examined written sources in Spanish including manuscripts, ICF and ICD, guidelines, recommendations and consensuses. This was followed by a nominal group meeting and a three-round Delphi. The recommendations from the RANM based on the Panhispanic dictionary were followed throughout the process. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 46 terms, abbreviations or acronyms related to the field of SpA. A Spanish translation was accepted for 6 terms and 6 abbreviations to name or classify the disease, and for 6 terms and 4 abbreviations related to SpA. It was agreed not to translate 15 acronyms into Spanish. However, when mentioning them, it was recommended to follow this structure: type of acronym in Spanish and acronym and expanded form in English. With regard to 7 terms or abbreviations attached to acronyms, it was agreed to translate only the expanded form and a translation was also selected for each of them. CONCLUSIONS: Through this standardization, it is expected to establish a common use of the Spanish nomenclature for SpA. The implementation of this consensus across the community will be of substantial benefit, avoiding misunderstandings and time-consuming processes.

Scoring with the Berlin MRI method for assessment of spinal inflammatory activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a calibration exercise among rheumatologists.

OBJECTIVES: To test the reliability of the Berlin MRI scoring method and the effect of a calibration exercise on the score's reliability among untrained readers in MRI examinations of patients with established ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Eleven rheumatologists read blinded images of 20 AS patients before and after a two-day workshop on the Berlin MRI scoring method. Reliability (intra- and inter-reader) and concordance with the expert (all measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) were compared before and after 2 weeks of the training. Feasibility in terms of time and difficulty was also measured. RESULTS: The mean Berlin score increased from (mean ± standard deviation) 5.04 ± 6.41 before to 6.40±7.08 after the calibration exercise (p<0.01). Inter-reader ICC decreased from 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.93) to 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66-0.90), and intra-reader ICC from 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) to 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92). Agreement with an experienced reader improved after the calibration exercise, with ICC = 0.59 (95% CI 0.45-0.76) before vs. ICC = 0.65 (95% CI 0.50-0.80) after training. CONCLUSIONS: The Berlin method is a reliable scoring method for assessment of spinal inflammatory activity by using MRI in patients with AS, even in the hands of inexperienced readers. A calibration exercise can improve feasibility and sensitivity of the scoring method.

Modelling cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments based on disease activity scores for the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.

Background. The objective of this simulation model was to assess the cost-effectiveness of different biological treatment strategies based on levels of disease activity in Spain, in patients with moderate to severe active RA and an insufficient response to at least one anti-TNF agent. Methods. Clinically meaningful effectiveness criteria were defined using DAS28 scores: remission and Low Disease Activity State (LDAS) thresholds. Monte-Carlo simulations were conducted to assess cost-effectiveness over 2 years of four biological sequential strategies composed of anti-TNF agents (adalimumab, infliximab), abatacept or rituximab, in patients with moderate to severe active RA and an insufficient response to etanercept as first biological agent. Results. The sequential strategy including etanercept, abatacept and adalimumab appeared more efficacious over 2 years (102 days in LDAS) compared to the same sequence including rituximab as second biological option (82 days in LDAS). Cost-effectiveness ratios showed lower costs per day in LDAS with abatacept (427 €) compared to rituximab as second biological option (508 €). All comparisons were confirmed when using remission criteria. Conclusion. Model results suggest that in patients with an insufficient response to anti-TNF agents, the biological sequences including abatacept appear more efficacious and cost-effective than similar sequences including rituximab or cycled anti-TNF agents.

Work disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of work disability in Spanish patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to identify factors related to it. METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on data from Regisponser (National Spanish Registry of Patients with Spondyloarthropathy). Demographic and disease-related variables were collected. AS patients were classified as work-disabled according to the Spanish Social Security System criteria. Variables that discriminated between AS patients with and those without work disability were identified using chi-square test or unpaired t test when appropriate. Multiple logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: In total 699 AS patients, age 48.7 +/- SD 12.7 years and with disease duration 14.1 +/- 10.1 years, were analyzed; 179 patients (25.6%) had permanent work disability. Several variables had significantly different values in patients with compared to those without work disability. In the regression model (pseudo R(2) = 0.26, p < 0.0001), age (p = 0.001), sex (p = 0.04), disease duration (p = 0.006), total Bath AS Radiological Index (p = 0.007), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI; p = 0.007), and chest expansion (p = 0.03) retained an independent association with work disability. When BASFI was excluded from the model the independent association with sex did not remain, and a significant association with finger to floor distance was found (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of permanent work disability in Spanish patients with AS is significant, and the main factors related to it are age, disease duration, structural damage, and physical functioning. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these results.

Variables related to utility in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

The objective of this study was to identify variables associated to the utility of the health states in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A cross-sectional study was performed in a tertiary care centre. AS patients (New York modified criteria) were included. Demographic and disease-related variables were collected. The social tariffs of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) were used to obtain utility values. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used in order to identify variables associated with utility. Seventy patients, 52 male (74.3%), with age (mean +/- SD) 43.7 +/- 9.1 years and disease duration 10.8 +/- 8.1 years, were included. The mean utility was 0.5625 +/- 0.3364. In the univariate analysis, patient global assessment, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) had a good correlation with the EQ-5D values (Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient r > 0.6) whereas physician global assessment, patient pain assessment, and cervical rotation had a moderate correlation with the EQ-5D (0.6 > r > 0.4). Patients with significant comorbidity had lower utility values (0.3563 +/- 0.068) than those without it (0.6796 +/- 0.041, p = 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, BASFI and BASDAI kept an independent association with utility and they explained a 62% of the variance of the utility values. In this study, physical function and disease activity, two outcomes with good responsiveness to the treatment, were the main determinants of the utility of the health states in AS patients.

Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the utility values and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) obtained by the Time Trade-Off instrument (TTO) and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); to analyze the association between utility values and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal, prospective, 1-year study of RA patients selected randomly from 10 rheumatology clinics. TTO and EQ-5D were administered at 4 scheduled visits. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 300 RA patients (82% women, mean age 59 years, mean disease duration 10.3 years). A total of 260 patients completed both the TTO and the EQ-5D at baseline, and the mean +/- SD TTO scores were significantly higher than the EQ-5D scores (0.81 +/- 0.22 versus 0.53 +/- 0.35, P < 0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the utility methods was 0.19. Data about changes in both TTO and EQ-5D scores during the study year were available in 163 patients. These changes tended to be larger in the TTO scores than the EQ-5D scores (mean +/- SD 0.05 +/- 0.25 versus -0.005 +/- 0.35, P = 0.054). The ICC for the mean changes in the utility scores was 0.24. Patients obtained a mean +/- SD of 0.04 +/- 0.20 QALYs based on TTO scores and 0.004 +/- 0.27 based on EQ-5D scores (P = 0.12). At baseline, the EQ-5D scores were highly correlated with the HAQ (r = -0.74) and moderately correlated with the DAS28 (r = -0.47), whereas the TTO correlated poorly with both the HAQ and DAS28. Correlation between the mean change in the EQ-5D and in the HAQ was moderate (r = -0.55). CONCLUSION: TTO and EQ-5D do not yield the same utility values. The results suggest that the EQ-5D is more representative of RA status than the TTO, a valuable conclusion when addressing economic evaluations in RA.

Costs of the standard rheumatology care in active rheumatoid arthritis patients seen in a tertiary care center in Mexico City.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs of standard care in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in a tertiary care center in México City in the context of a clinical trial. To analyze the relationship between costs and utility units obtained by the patients in this scenario. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This economic evaluation was performed during a clinical trial with a 48-week followup in a tertiary care center in México City. The trial compared the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids versus placebo in patients with active RA who also received standard rheumatology care. The costs of medical consultations, complementary tests and drugs were assessed. Other direct costs were also measured. Hypothetical scenarios with fewer medical consultations and complementary tests than those in the clinical trial were also analyzed. Utilities were assessed by the Health Utility Index. A cost-utility ratio was calculated using the baseline utilities score as comparator. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ninety RA patients (83 women [92%], age [X ± SD] 43.2 ± 14.2 years with disease duration of 3.3 ± 4.6 years) were included. Data from 88 patients were analyzed. The total direct costs were 152,704.11 US$ 2005 divided into medical attention (78,386.43 US$ 2005, 51.33%), drugs (39,339.5 US$ 2005, 25.76%) and other direct costs (34,978.18 US$ 2005. 22.91%). In scenarios with fewer medical consultations and complementary tests than those in the clinical trial, the total direct costs ranged from 39,507.4 to 103,880.6 US$ 2005. Patients improved by a mean of 0.18 utility units on a 0-1 scale equivalent to 0.18 quality adjusted lifeyears (QALYs). The cost-utility ratios ranged from 2,494.1 to 9,640.38 US$ 2005 per QALY in the scenarios analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs of the standard care of RA in the scenarios analyzed are substantial in the social and economic context of Mexico. The cost per gained QALY is high.