RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bladder volume at the onset of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is an important prognostic indicator of spontaneous resolution and the risk of pyelonephritis. OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine whether pediatric urologists and pediatric radiologists can accurately estimate the timing of reflux by examining voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images without prior knowledge of the instilled contrast volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total bladder volume and the volume at the time of reflux were collected from VCUG reports to determine the volume at the onset of VUR. Thirty-nine patients were sorted into three groups: early-/mid-filling reflux, late-filling and voiding only. Thirty-nine images were shown to three pediatric urologists and two pediatric radiologists in a blinded fashion and they were then asked to estimate VUR timing based on the above categories. A weighted kappa statistic was calculated to assess rater agreement with the gold standard volume-based report of VUR timing. RESULTS: The mean patient age at VCUG was 3.1±2.9 months, the median VUR was grade 3, and 20 patients were female. Overall agreement among all five raters was moderate (k=0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.50). Individual agreement between rater and gold standard was slight to moderate with kappa values ranging from 0.13 to 0.43. CONCLUSION: Pediatric radiologists and urologists are unable to accurately and reliably characterize VUR timing on fluoroscopic VCUG. These findings support the recently published American Academy of Pediatrics protocol recommending the routine recording of bladder volume at the onset of VUR as a standard component of all VCUGs to assist in a more accurate assessment of the likelihood of resolution and risk of recurrent urinary tract infections.
Assuntos
Refluxo Vesicoureteral/diagnóstico por imagem , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/fisiopatologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Micção , UrografiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: and Objective: Health literacy is defined as the ability to obtain, integrate, and appraise health-related knowledge. It is known to correlate with disparities in clinical outcomes in adults with chronic disease. Patients with spina bifida represent a potentially vulnerable cohort as they often have multiple comorbidities. The authors aimed to characterize health literacy in adolescent patients with spina bifida and their caregivers. STUDY DESIGN: The Newest Vital Sign (NVS), a validated assessment of health literacy and numeracy, was administered to patients (aged ≥10 years) and caregivers in outpatient pediatric urology and multidisciplinary spina bifida clinics. Subjects not fluent in English or Spanish and those with cognitive delay were excluded. Survey responses and demographic information were analyzed and compared between the spina bifida and control groups. RESULTS: Three hundred eleven caregivers (caregivers for patients with spina bifida: 185, caregivers for the controls: 126) and 84 adolescents (those with spina bifida: 46, controls: 38) completed the NVS. Although there was no difference in health literacy between caregivers (p = 0.98), adolescents with spina bifida demonstrated lower NVS scores (spina bifida 1 [0-3] vs. control 2 [2-4]; p = 0.02) (Figure). Health literacy of patients with spina bifida and controls increased with age (p = 0.002). Adjusting for age and gender, the odds of having limited literacy were 5.5 times higher in patients with spina bifida than in the controls (p = 0.004). Inadequate caregiver health literacy was associated with a lower education level (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Spina bifida is among the most complex birth defects compatible with life and affects a multitude of systems. Although it is well established that limited health literacy in adults with chronic disease is associated with adverse outcomes, there are considerably fewer data in the pediatric population. The authors found that caregivers of patients with spina bifida exhibited health literacy and numeracy comparable with parents in the control group, despite lower education levels. In contrast, adolescents with spina bifida demonstrated poorer health literacy than the controls. Multidisciplinary care is necessary, given the medical complexity of spina bifida; therefore, impaired understanding of adults' own needs may pose a barrier to successful transition to their care and subsequent outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surveyed caregivers for patients with spina bifida exhibited adequate health literacy, especially those with some college education; however inadequate health literacy was more likely among adolescents with spina bifida when compared with the controls. Screening for health literacy may be useful to assess readiness for transition to more independent self-care among patients with spina bifida.
Assuntos
Letramento em Saúde , Disrafismo Espinal , Adolescente , Adulto , Cuidadores , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Disrafismo Espinal/terapia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics revised practice parameters regarding febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) in children aged 2-24 months. The Section on Urology opposed the omission of voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), and expressed concern that potential untoward consequences of deferring VCUG may be most felt by children on Medicaid. OBJECTIVE: We ascertained imaging and characteristics of children presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with initial fUTI to determine the impact of patient demographics on admissions for pyelonephritis. METHODS: Children aged 2-24 months presenting to the ED with initial fUTI were identified. Demographics, insurance status, laboratory studies, renal-bladder ultrasound (RBUS), VCUG, and hospital admission status were evaluated. RESULTS: Three-hundred fifty patients met inclusion criteria; 88 (25.1%) were admitted. Admitted patients were significantly (p < 0.001) younger (mean 0.31 ± 0.33 years) than those managed as outpatients (mean 0.91 ± 0.7 years). On univariate analysis, male gender (p < 0.001), Medicaid insurance (p < 0.05), and non-Hispanic race (p < 0.05) were associated with admission. Race retained significance on multivariate analysis; Caucasian children were 2.35 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-7.23) and African-American children 3.8 times more likely to be admitted than Hispanic patients (95% CI 1.88-7.63). Children with abnormal RBUS were 12.8 times more likely to require admission (95% CI 4.44-37.0). Medicaid was also independently predictive of admission; such patients were 2.6 times more likely to be admitted than those with private insurance (95% CI 1.15-5.88). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal ultrasound, non-Hispanic race, and public insurance were strongly associated with hospital admission in children presenting to the ED with initial febrile urinary tract infection.
Assuntos
Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Demografia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Febre/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Medicaid , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: An agreed upon method for describing the severity of hypospadias has not been established. Herein we assess the inter-observer reliability of the GMS hypospadias score and correlate it with the risk of a post-operative complication. METHODS: A 3-component method for grading the severity of hypospadias was developed (GMS). Eighty-five consecutive patients presenting for hypospadias repair were graded independently by at least 2 surgeons using the GMS criteria. Scores were compared statistically to determine agreement between the observers. The outcomes of these patients were then reviewed to determine how the GMS score correlates to the risk of a surgical complication. RESULTS: The G, M, and S scores had excellent agreement between observers. The GMS total score was exactly the same or differed by one point in 79/85 (93%) of patients. The complication rate was 5.6% for patients with a GMS score of 6 or less, but was 25.0% for patients with a GMS score greater than 6. CONCLUSIONS: The GMS score provides a concise method for describing the severity of hypospadias and appears to have high inter-observer reliability. The GMS score also appears to correlate with the risk of a surgical complication.