Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: Incorporating Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions in Assessment and Management.

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is multifactorial in etiology and heterogeneous in presentation. Identification of all pain contributors is essential for successful management. Chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs) are a specified group of chronic pain conditions that commonly co-occur in patients. We briefly review individual COPCs and highlight risk factors and mechanisms that appear to be applicable across COPCs. We review evaluation and communication strategies that may help establish a productive therapeutic relationship between clinicians and patients. Management should include treatment of peripheral pain generators as well as co-occurring psychological conditions and central sensitization when present.

Short-acting and Long-acting Opioids Utilization among Women Diagnosed with Endometriosis in the United States: A Population-based Claims Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and pattern of opioid use in endometriosis and the characteristics of patients prescribed an opioid using medical insurance claims data. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of data from the Truven MarketScan Commercial database for the period of January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2016. SETTING: The Truven database includes inpatient, outpatient, and prescription claims covering more than 115 million unique individuals and over 36 million inpatient hospital discharges across multiple payer types and all 50 states. PATIENTS: Women with endometriosis were defined as those with 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient codes for endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were assigned. Women who filled an opioid prescription within 12 months of diagnosis were placed in the opioid cohort and women who did not fill an opioid prescription were placed in the nonopioid cohort. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were evaluated 12 months preindex (date of the first diagnosis) and opioid use was assessed for 12 months after the index date. The dataset included 58 472 women with endometriosis. Of these, 61.7% filled an opioid prescription during the study period. More than 95% filled prescriptions for short-acting opioids (SAOs) only, 4.1% filled prescriptions for both SAOs and extended-release/long-acting opioids (LAOs), and 0.6% filled prescriptions for LAOs only. Patients who filled an opioid prescription had higher baseline comorbidities (especially gynecologic and chronic pain comorbidities) and endometriosis-related medication use compared with patients who did not fill an opioid prescription during the study period. Patients who filled both LAO and SAO prescriptions had the highest total days' supply of opioids, the proportion of days covered by prescriptions, and morphine equivalent daily dose. These patients also had the highest proportions of opioid switching and dose augmentation. Statistical trends in data were not substantially altered when analyses excluded patients with chronic pain comorbidities or surgical opioid prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Although opioids are not a recommended treatment for endometriosis, more than half of our cohort filled an opioid prescription within 1 year after a first recorded diagnosis of endometriosis. Patients who filled an opioid prescription tended to use more endometriosis-related medications and have a higher comorbidity burden. Additional research is necessary to better understand the reasons and outcomes associated with opioid utilization in endometriosis and to determine if there is a more effective pain management treatment plan for patients taking opioids.

Epidemiology and management of uterine fibroids.

Uterine leiomyomas are one of the most common and yet understudied diseases in women. These tumors, commonly known as fibroids, affect women mainly during their reproductive years and are diagnosed in up to 70% of white women and more than 80% of women of African ancestry during their lifetime. This disease has a profound impact on health care delivery and costs worldwide. Though most women with fibroids are asymptomatic, approximately 30% of them will present with severe symptoms which can include abnormal uterine bleeding, anemia, pelvic pain and pressure, back pain, urinary frequency, constipation, or infertility, and will require intervention. Furthermore, fibroids have been associated with poor obstetrical outcomes. The current options for symptomatic fibroid treatment include expectant, medical, and surgical management, and interventional radiology procedures. This article reviews the recent progress and available management strategies for uterine fibroids and highlights areas where further research is needed to find new therapeutic targets and better personalize treatments.

Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.

BACKGROUND: In April 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published its first safety communication discouraging "the use of laparoscopic power morcellation during hysterectomy or myomectomy for the treatment of women with uterine fibroids." Due to the concern of worsening outcomes for patients with occult uterine malignancy, specifically uterine leiomyosarcoma, the FDA recommended a significant change to existing surgical planning, patient consent, and surgical technique in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We sought to report temporal trends in surgical approach to hysterectomy and postoperative complications before and after the April 17, 2014, FDA safety communication concerning the use of power morcellation during myomectomy or hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed with patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative from Jan. 1, 2013, through Dec. 31, 2014. The rates of abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy, as well as the rates of major postoperative complications and 30-day hospital readmissions and reoperations, were compared before and after April 17, 2014, the date of the original FDA safety communication. Major postoperative complications included blood transfusions, vaginal cuff infection, vaginal cuff dehiscence, ureteral obstruction, vesicovaginal fistula, deep and organ space surgical site infection, acute renal failure, respiratory failure, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis requiring therapy, cerebral vascular accident, cardiac arrest, and death. We calculated the median episode cost related to hysterectomy readmissions using Michigan Value Collaborative data. Analyses were performed using robust multivariable multinomial and logistic regression models. RESULTS: There were 18,299 hysterectomies available for analysis during the study period. In all, 2753 cases were excluded due to an indication for cancer, cervical dysplasia, or endometrial hyperplasia, and 174 cases were excluded due to missing covariate data. Compared to the 15 months preceding the FDA safety communication, in the 8 months afterward, utilization of laparoscopic hysterectomies decreased by 4.1% (P = .005) and both abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies increased (1.7%, P = .112 and 2.4%, P = .012, respectively). Major surgical complications not including blood transfusions significantly increased after the date of the FDA safety communication, from 2.2-2.8% (P = .015), and the rate of hospital readmission within 30 days also increased from 3.4-4.2% (P = .025). The rate of all major surgical complications or hospital reoperations did not change significantly after the date of the FDA communication (P = .177 and P = .593, respectively). The median risk-adjusted total episode cost for readmissions was $5847 (interquartile range $5478-10,389). CONCLUSION: Following the April 2014 FDA safety communication regarding power morcellation, utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy decreased, and major surgical, nontransfusion complications and 30-day hospital readmissions increased.

The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the frequency of minimally invasive surgical approach to hysterectomy between two time periods, during which the use of the robotic technique has rapidly increased. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 623 consecutive patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications at the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery via laparoscopic, robotic, laparotomy, mini-laparotomy and vaginal approaches from July 2004 to June 2010. "Early period" refers to the first 311 patients, and "late period" refers to the remaining 312 patients. RESULTS: The characteristics of patients from the early and late periods were comparable in terms of age, BMI and uterine weight. The rates of hysterectomy by laparotomy, traditional laparoscopy, robotic, vaginal, and mini-laparotomy were significantly different between the early and late periods (17.7 to 5.4%, 39.5 to 17.6%, 23.8 to 64.1%, 5.8 to 4.8% and 13.2 to 8%, respectively, P < 0.01), with the overall rates of hysterectomies completed via a minimally invasive approach increasing from 82.3 to 94.6%, respectively (P < 0.01). There were no differences in surgical complications between the two periods. CONCLUSION: Increased utilization of a robotic approach to hysterectomy correlates with decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy concurrent with decreasing rates of traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. This shift in surgical approach to hysterectomy, while beneficial in increasing the rates of minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy, may have significant economic implications due to the higher cost of robotic surgery.