Digital zoom is a useful, simple, and cost-effective method of reducing radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Reducing radiation exposure is a very important issue in interventional cardiology techniques such as percutaneous coronary intervention. Although novel techniques to reduce radiation exposure are valuable, we should also reconsider older techniques. Digital zoom has been available in Japan from 2005. Digital zoom enlarges an 8-inch field of view (FOV) by 1.2 times, allowing visualization of a 6.7-inch FOV without FOV switching. We identified 2101 suitable cases of percutaneous intervention (PCI) and divided them into two groups according to the use of digital zoom; 1195 patients were included in the digital zoom group and 906 patients in the conventional group. We collected data regarding the reference air kerma (RAK) and dose-area product (DAP). We calculated RAK and DAP per minute fluoroscope time (RAK/min, DAP/min, respectively). There were intergroup differences in RAK, DAP, RAK/min, and DAP/min (digital zoom group vs conventional group; RAK, 1590 mGy [990-2410] vs 1850 [1220-2720], p < 0.01, RAK/min; 54.7 mGy/min [38.5-73.2] vs 71.2 [51.5-93.0], p < 0.01; DAP, 16,000 cGy × cm2 [10,300-24,400] vs 20,700 [13,400-29,500], p < 0.001; DAP/min, 557 cGy × cm2/min [392-737] vs 782 [571-1010], p < 0.01, respectively). Because of baseline differences between the two groups, we performed propensity score matching. Even after score matching, there were intergroup differences in DAP, DAP/min, RAK, and RAK/min. Furthermore, the least squares method showed that digital zoom is a significant predictor of RAK (ß = 0.14, p < 0.01) and DAP (ß = 0.20, p < 0.01). Digital zoom is an older cost-effective technique that can significantly reduce radiation exposure in PCI.

A Decision Tree-Based Survival Analysis of Patients with a History of Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival in patients who are at risk of sudden death. However, inappropriate therapy is commonly given to ICD recipients, and this situation may be associated with an increased risk of death. This study aimed to construct a risk stratification scheme by using decision tree analysis in patients who received inappropriate ICD therapy.Mortality was calculated from a retrospective data analysis of a multicenter cohort involving 417 ICD recipients. Inappropriate therapy was defined as therapy for nonventricular arrhythmias, including sinus tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, oversensing, and lead failure. Inappropriate therapy included antitachycardia pacing, cardioversion, and defibrillation. The prognostic factors were identified by a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and we constructed a decision tree.During an average follow-up of 5.2 years, 48 patients (12%) had all-cause death. A multivariate Cox hazard model revealed that the age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, P < 0.001), ln B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (HR 1.47, P = 0.02), nonsinus rhythm at implantation (HR 2.70, P < 0.05), and inappropriate therapy occurring during sedentary/awake conditions (HR 3.51, P = 0.001) correlated with an increased risk of mortality. An inappropriate therapy due to abnormal sensing (HR 0.16, P = 0.04) decreased the risk of mortality. Furthermore, a decision tree analysis stratified the patients well by using 4 covariates: BNP, activity at the time of inappropriate therapy, mechanism of inappropriate therapy, and baseline rhythm at ICD implantation (log-rank test, P < 0.0001).We identified the predictors of mortality in inappropriate ICD therapy recipients and constructed a risk stratification scheme by using decision tree analysis.

Quantitative assessment of arterial stiffness by multiphase analysis in retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison between patients under chronic hemodialysis and age-matched controls.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of assessment of arterial stiffness with multiphase analysis of data sets of retrospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography by comparing wall stiffness of the descending aorta between patients under chronic hemodialysis and age-matched controls undergoing imaging for by-pass graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 33 patients composed of 10 hemodialysis patients and 23 age-matched control subjects, who underwent MDCT to evaluate the coronary arterial lesions and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement. Scan data were reconstructed at 25 phases between 0% and 96% of the R-R intervals with an increment of 4%. Pixel-based measurements of arterial dimensions were performed at 1 cross-section of the descending aorta in a transaxial plane including the aortic valve at its widest. Aortic distensibility (AD) was calculated as follows: AD = (maximal dimension -- minimal dimension)/minimal dimension x pulse pressure. Comparison in the AD was performed between the hemodialysis patients and control subjects. Correlation between the AD and PWV were assessed separately in the patients under hemodialysis and age-matched controls. RESULTS: AD was significantly smaller in patients under hemodialysis than in age-matched controls. The square of PWV correlated better with the inverse of the AD in the control subjects compared to patients on hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: Multiphase analysis in ECG-gated MDCT enables us to assess stiffness of the descending aorta objectively and noninvasively.