Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and Mild Diabetes Mellitus Following Treatment With Pioglitazone: Reports of a Randomised Trial From The Japan Working Group for the Assessment Whether Pioglitazone Protects DM Patients Against Re-Infarction (PPAR Study).

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is critically important to prevent ischaemic heart failure and reduce social burden. Pioglitazone improves vascular dysfunction and prevents coronary atherosclerosis, mainly via anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic effects by enhancing adiponectin production in addition to antihyperglycemic effects, thus suggesting that pioglitazone attenuates cardiovascular events in patients with mild (HbA1c levels < 6·5%) diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, we evaluated the effects of pioglitazone on cardiovascular events in patients with both previous MI and mild DM. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial, we randomly assigned 630 patients with mild DM with a history of MI to undergo either DM therapy with (pioglitazone group) or without (control group) pioglitazone. DM was diagnosed using the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, and mild DM was defined if HbA1c level was < 6·5%. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation caused by acute MI, unstable angina, coronary revascularisation (including percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac bypass surgery), and stroke. FINDINGS: HbA1C levels were 5·9 and 5·8% (p = 0·71) at baseline and 6·0 and 5·8% (p < 0·01) at 2 years for the control and pioglitazone groups, respectively.The primary endpoint was observed in 14·2% and 14·1% patients in the control and pioglitazone groups during two years (95% confidential interval (CI):0.662-1·526, p = 0·98), respectively; the incidence of MI and cerebral infarction was 0·3% and 2·2% (95%CI: 0·786-32·415, p = 0·09) and 1·0% and 0·3% (95%CI: 0·051-3·662, p = 0·44), respectively. Post-hoc analyses of the 7-year observation period showed that these trends were comparable (21·9% and 19·2% in the control and pioglitazone groups, 95%CI: 0.618-1·237, p = 0·45). INTERPRETATION: Pioglitazone could not reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with mild DM and previous MI.

Echocardiographic assessment of LV hypertrophy and function in aortic-banded mice: necropsy validation.

We characterized the time course of the left ventricular (LV) geometric and functional changes after aortic banding, validated them by necropsy, and investigated the sensitivity of echocardiographic findings on LV hypertrophy. C57BL/6 mice were subjected to transverse aortic constriction (TAC) or sham operation; echocardiographic assessments were performed before or at 2, 4, 6, and 11 wk after surgery; and some of the mice were euthanized at the corresponding time points. There was a progressive increase in diastolic posterior wall thickness and LV systolic dimension; the percentage of LV fractional shortening (LV%FS) decreased progressively at 4 wk, whereas these parameters remained stable in sham-operated mice. Echo LV mass and LV%FS correlated well with actual whole heart mass and ratio of lung weight to body weight, respectively (r = 0.765 and -0.749, respectively; P < 0.0001). These results suggest that the development of myocardial hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction is a time-dependent process. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial hypertrophy and functional changes correlate well with the actual heart mass and lung mass. Echocardiography is sensitive enough to assess myocardial hypertrophy and heart functional changes induced by pressure overload in mice.