Preoperative nutritional status assessment predicts postoperative outcomes in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: As nutritional status plays an important role in outcomes after surgery, this study evaluated the association between preoperative nutritional status (NS) and postoperative outcomes after major resection for lung cancer. METHODS: We identified 219 patients with a diagnosis of cancer who underwent pulmonary resection from 2010 to 2012. Preoperative NS was assessed by anthropometric and biological parameters, body mass index (BMI), and the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI). We stratified this population into 4 BMI groups: underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese and 4 NRI groups: well-nourished; mildly malnourished; moderately malnourished and severely malnourished. The outcomes measured were postoperative complications; 30-day postoperative mortality; hospital length of stay (LOS), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We performed both unadjusted analysis and adjusted multivariable analysis, controlling for statistically significant variables. RESULTS: Mean BMI and NRI were, respectively, 26.5 ± 4.3 and 112.4 ± 3.3. There were no significant differences between BMI categories and resection type, pathological stage, or overall postoperative complications. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.05) in postoperative complications were observed among the NRI groups. LOS was longer in underweight and/or malnourished patients. In terms of OS, we found no significant differences according to NRI and BMI; however, patients with underweight had significantly shorter DFS compared with patients with overweight and obesity (log-rank p-value = 0.001). CONCLUSION: NS as measured by the NRI is an independent predictor of the risk of postsurgical complications, regardless of clinicopathologic characteristics. NRI might therefore be an useful tool for identifying early-stage lung cancer patients at risk for postoperative complications.

Geriatric assessment may help decision-making in elderly patients with inoperable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) increases survival in patients with inoperable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is no consensus on the treatment of elderly patients. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and its ability to predict toxicity in this setting. METHODS: We enrolled 85 consecutive elderly (⩾75 years) participants, who underwent CGA and the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13). Those classified as fit and medium-fit by CGA were deemed candidates for cCRT (platinum-based chemotherapy concurrent with thoracic radiation therapy), while unfit patients received best supportive care. RESULTS: Fit (37%) and medium-fit (48%) patients had significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) (23.9 and 16.9 months, respectively) than unfit patients (15%) (9.3 months, log-rank P=0.01). In multivariate analysis, CGA groups and VES-13 were independent prognostic factors. Fit and medium-fit patients receiving cCRT (n=54) had mOS of 21.1 months (95% confidence interval: 16.2, 26.0). In those patients, higher VES-13 (⩾3) was associated with shorter mOS (16.33 vs 24.3 months, P=0.027) and higher risk of G3-4 toxicity (65 vs 32%, P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive geriatric assessment and VES-13 showed independent prognostic value. Comprehensive geriatric assessment may help to identify elderly patients fit enough to be treated with cCRT.