RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Impella is a catheter-based micro-axial flow pump placed across the aortic valve, and it is currently the only percutaneous left ventricular assist device approved for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiogenic shock. Areas Covered: Even though several studies have repeatedly demonstrated the excellent hemodynamic profile of Impella in high-risk settings, it remains underutilized. Here we aim to provide an up-to-date summary of the available literature on Impellas use in High risk settings as well as the practical aspects of its usage. Expert Commentary: Percutaneous coronary interventions in high rsk settings have always been challenging for a physician. Impella 2.5 and CP, have been proven safe, cost effective and feasible in High Risk Percutaneous coronary Interventions with an excellent hemodynamic profile.
Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Ilustração Médica , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodosRESUMO
Prior studies have highlighted disparities in cardiac lifesaving procedure utilization, particularly among women and in minorities. Although there has been a significant increase in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion, socioeconomic disparities still exist in the trend of ICD utilization. With the use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2003 through 2011, we identified subjects with ICD insertion (procedure code 37.94) and cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (procedure code 00.50, 00.51) as codified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Overall, 1 020 076 ICDs were implanted in the United States from 2003 to 2011. We observed an initial increase in ICD utilization by 51%, from 95 062 in 2003 to 143 262 in 2006, followed by a more recent decline. The majority of ICDs were implanted in men age ≥65 years. Implantation of ICDs was 2.5× more common in men than in women (402 per million vs 163 per million). Approximately 95% of the ICDs were implanted in insured patients, and 5% were used in the uninsured population. There has been a significant increase in ICD implantation in blacks, from 162 per million in 2003 to 291 per million in 2011. We found a significant difference in the volume of ICD implants between the insured and the uninsured patient populations. Racial disparities have narrowed significantly in comparison with those noted in earlier studies and are now more reflective of the population demographics at large. On the other hand, significant gender disparities continue to exist.
Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Cardioversão Elétrica/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Seguro Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Cardioversão Elétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , População BrancaRESUMO
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia worldwide and the most common arrhythmia leading to hospitalization. Due to a substantial increase in incidence and prevalence of AF over the past few decades, it attributes to an extensive economic and public health burden. The increasing number of hospitalizations, aging population, anticoagulation management, and increasing trend for disposition to a skilled facility are drivers of the increasing cost associated with AF. There has been significant progress in AF management with the release of new oral anticoagulants, use of left atrial catheter ablation, and novel techniques for left atrial appendage closure. In this article, we aim to review the trends in epidemiology, hospitalization, and cost of AF along with its future implications on public health.