Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ir J Psychol Med ; 40(1): 63-73, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34193324

RESUMO

Individuals' mental health and wellbeing are dependent on many social factors including housing, employment, education and adequate nutrition among others. These factors can influence at personal, family and community levels. The interlinked and cumulative impact of these social determinants needs to be ascertained to aid appropriate patient management, as well as to establish prevention and health education programmes. Some of these determinants also have to be recognised at policy level. It is crucial for clinicians to understand the role social determinants play in the genesis and perpetuation of mental and physical illnesses, so that appropriate social interventions can be set in place. Clinicians have a role to play in their clinical practice, as well as advocates for their patients and policy leaders. In order to ensure that health is joined up with other sectors, such as education, employment, judiciary and housing, policy-makers must avoid silos. Every policy must have an impact assessment on physical health and mental health. Policy-makers need to understand scientific evidence and must work with researchers, clinicians, communities and patients to help develop and implement rights-based policies.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Fatores Sociais , Emprego
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 22(1): 73, 2021 04 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853537

RESUMO

COVID-19 will cause normal feelings of worry and stress and many of those who experience higher levels of distress will experience resolution of their symptoms as society returns to pre-COVID-19 functioning. Only a minority are likely to develop a psychiatric disorder. Certain individuals may be vulnerable to experiencing persisting symptoms, such as those with pre-existing comorbidity. Management approaches could centre around using collaborative approaches to provide and build on already existing socioeconomic support structures, the avoidance of over-medicalisation, watchful waiting and finally treating those who do meet the criteria for psychiatric diagnosis. Primary care clinicians are likely be the first healthcare point of contact for most COVID-19 related distress and it is important that they are able to provide evidence based and evidence informed responses, which includes social, psychological and pharmacological approaches. This expert opinion paper serves to summarise some approaches, based primarily on indirect extrapolation of evidence concerning the general management of psychological distress, in the absence of COVID-19 specific evidence, to assist primary care clinicians in their assessment and management of COVID-19 related distress.


Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Angústia Psicológica , Estresse Psicológico/prevenção & controle , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Avaliação de Sintomas , Incerteza
3.
BMJ Open ; 9(6): e029690, 2019 06 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31201194

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: On 1 May 2018 minimum unit pricing (MUP) of alcohol was introduced in Scotland. This study used Twitter posts to quantify sentiment expressed online during the introduction of MUP, conducted a thematic analysis of these perceptions and analysed which Twitter users were associated with which particular sentiments. DESIGN AND SETTING: This qualitative social media analysis captured all tweets relating to MUP during the 2 weeks after the introduction of the policy. These tweets were assessed using a mixture of human and machine coding for relevance, sentiment and source. A thematic analysis was conducted. PARTICIPANTS: 74 639 tweets were collected over 14 days. Of these 53 574 were relevant to MUP. RESULTS: Study findings demonstrate that opinion on the introduction of MUP in Scotland was somewhat divided, as far as is discernible on Twitter, with a slightly higher proportion of positive posts (35%) than negative posts (28%), with positive sentiment stronger in Scotland itself. Furthermore, 55% of positive tweets/retweets were originally made by health or alcohol policy-related individuals or organisations. Thematic analysis of tweets showed some evidence of misunderstanding around policy issues. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to appreciate the divided nature of public opinion on the introduction of MUP in Scotland using Twitter, the nature of the sentiment around it and the key actors involved. It will be possible to later study how this changes when the policy becomes more established.


Assuntos
Bebidas Alcoólicas/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo/legislação & jurisprudência , Opinião Pública , Mídias Sociais , Bebidas Alcoólicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Escócia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA