Association of arbitrary prescribing behavior to costly drug expenditures: a pharmacoeconomic study in primary care.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the cost-related prescribing performance of primary care physicians who had a higher versus lower tendency of arbitrary prescribing. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated the prescriptions of primary care physicians in Istanbul, collected with 3:1 systematic sampling. We determined higher versus lower arbitrary prescribing by the physician's degree of writing the solo diagnosis of "Z00- General examination without diagnosis/complaint": those for whom such prescriptions constituted >5% were classified as Group A and those with them at <0.5% as Group B. We compared these two groups by the total and disease-specific drug costs per prescription they produced for 10 frequently encountered indications. RESULTS: The median cost of disease-specific medication for all diagnoses in Group A and Group B, except anemia, was equal. In upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), hypertension, anemia, diabetes, and conjunctivitis, the mean prescription costs of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B (P < .001, P < .001, P = .009, P = .007, and P < .001, respectively), whereas disease-specific drug costs per prescription were similar (P > .05 in all diagnoses). In myalgia, Group A had lower cost per prescription (P < .001) and higher analgesic costs per prescription (P < .001) compared to those in Group B. We found significantly higher disease-specific drug cost share in Group B for URTIs (antibiotic), gastroesophageal reflux disease (gastric acid-suppressant), hypertension (antihypertensive), anemia (iron preparations), diabetes (antidiabetic), depression (antidepressant), and conjunctivitis (corticosteroid) than those in Group A (P < .001 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that physicians who had a higher tendency of prescribing for no clear indication are also more likely to produce costly prescriptions.

Assessment of clinical features and renal functions in Coronavirus disease-19: A retrospective analysis of 96 patients.

BACKGROUND: The most common extra pulmonary organ dysfunction in acute respiratory distress syndrome is acute kidney injury. Current data so far indicate low incidence of AKI in Covid-19 disease. OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective study, we analysed the clinical features of patients diagnosed with Covid-19 and investigated the effect of Covid-19 on kidney function. METHODS: Ninety-six patients diagnosed with Covid-19 were included in our study. Demographic features (Age, gender, co-morbidities), symptoms, thorax CT findings, Covid-19 PCR results and laboratory findings were recorded. The clinical features of the patients were analysed and kidney function values before Covid-19 diagnosis were compared with kidney function values after Covid-19 diagnosis. RESULTS: Most presenting symptom was fever (51%). Most accompanying co-morbidity was hypertension (56%). According to laboratory findings; ferritin, D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels were statistically significantly higher in ARDS group than severe pneumonia and pneumonia group (P = .002, P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). Also lymphocyte levels were statistically significantly lower in ARDS group than severe pneumonia and pneumonia group (P = .042). According to KDIGO criteria 3 (3.1%) patients had AKI during the hospital stay. For all patients, there was statistically significant difference between basal, 1st, 5th and 10th day BUN and SCr levels (P = .024 and P = .018, respectively). For severe pneumonia group there was statistically significant difference between basal, 1st, 5th and 10th day SCr levels (P = .045). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that Covid-19 can cause renal impairment both with pneumonia and ARDS. A large-scale prospective randomised studies are needed to reach final judgement about this topic.