Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Perinatol ; 35(2): 128-31, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25144158

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of an objective measure of pain, agitation and sedation using the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) compared with nursing bedside assessment. STUDY DESIGN: Neonates admitted in neonatal intensive care unit over a 6-month period were eligible. Pain and sedation were assessed with N-PASS, and a subjective questionnaire was administered to the bedside nurse. RESULT: A total of 218 neonates were eligible (median: gestational age 34.6 weeks, age at assessment 7 days). N-PASS pain score correlated significantly with both nurses' pain score (Spearman coefficient (r)=0.37; P<0.001) and agitation score (r=0.56; P<0.001). N-PASS sedation score correlated with nurses' sedation score (r=-0.39; P<0.001). Adjusting for gestational age, day of life, intrauterine drug exposure and use of high frequency ventilation only slightly attenuated the correlations (r=0.36, 0.55 and -0.31, respectively). CONCLUSION: The N-PASS captures nursing assessment of pain, agitation and sedation in this broad population and provides a quantitative assessment of subjective descriptions that often drives patient therapy.


Assuntos
Sedação Consciente , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/métodos , Avaliação em Enfermagem , Medição da Dor , Agitação Psicomotora , Escala Visual Analógica , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Sedação Consciente/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Avaliação em Enfermagem/métodos , Avaliação em Enfermagem/normas , Medição da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor/normas , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Agitação Psicomotora/diagnóstico , Agitação Psicomotora/terapia , Melhoria de Qualidade
2.
J Perinatol ; 33(12): 910-3, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23970207

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Starting in 2013, all pediatric residents entering fellowship must be provided six educational units whose structure is to be determined by their individual career plans. We sought to determine whether (1) neonatology fellowship program directors (PDs) consistently identify certain weaknesses among incoming fellows and (2) neonatology fellowship PDs agree on the most beneficial activities in which pediatric residents should participate to improve preparation for entry into neonatology fellowships. STUDY DESIGN: We sent a 21-question survey focused on the structure and implementation of the 6-unit curriculum to all members of the Organization of Neonatology Training Program Directors. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of PDs responded. Seventy-five percent cited insufficient procedural skills as the primary weakness of incoming fellows. More than 80% rated additional training in clinical neonatology, including procedural and resuscitation training, as 'beneficial' or 'highly beneficial'. In contrast, fewer than 40% of PDs gave the same positive ratings to activities broadly focused on scholarship. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey may help guide pediatric residency programs as they undertake development of these new curricular initiatives for individual residents entering neonatology.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Currículo , Internato e Residência , Neonatologia/educação , Pediatria/educação , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Coleta de Dados , Bolsas de Estudo , Neonatologia/organização & administração , Diretores Médicos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA