Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 28(5): 449-457, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32342595

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have explored the oral health training needs and professional self-efficacy (PSE) in both pharmacy support staff and pharmacists related to managing children's dental problems. This study assessed community pharmacy staff perceptions of their (i) training experiences and interests; (ii) PSE; and (iii) whether this was influenced by the pharmacy being part of a minor ailment scheme (MAS), where staff could directly offer advice and issue prescription medications without patients seeing a doctor. METHODS: All of the 1851 community pharmacies across London, UK, were invited to participate in an online questionnaire. Staff rated their prior training, perceived need for further training and confidence in giving parents advice related to three dental problems in children (dental pain, mouth ulcers and dental trauma). Information was collected about staff roles and whether the pharmacy was a MAS. KEY FINDINGS: From 752 community pharmacies, 846 community pharmacy staff participated. Positive experiences of training were variable but interest in further training for all three dental problems was high. Pharmacy support staff had significantly lower PSE scores than pharmacy professionals (P = 0.009). A significant interaction showed that pharmacy staff who had poorly rated prior training on advising parents about managing their child's dental pain and who did not work in a MAS had lower PSE scores than staff who had highly rated training and who worked in a MAS (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Minor ailment scheme pharmacies may be an optimal environment for frontline pharmacy support staff to develop higher PSE when combined with good quality oral health training.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Educação Continuada em Farmácia/métodos , Saúde Bucal/educação , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Autonomia Profissional , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Londres , Úlceras Orais/diagnóstico , Úlceras Orais/tratamento farmacológico , Úlceras Orais/prevenção & controle , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Papel Profissional , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos Dentários/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Dentários/tratamento farmacológico , Traumatismos Dentários/prevenção & controle , Odontalgia/diagnóstico , Odontalgia/tratamento farmacológico , Odontalgia/prevenção & controle
3.
Environ Health ; 16(1): 100, 2017 09 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28938911

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although evidence shows that poor air quality can harm human health, we have a limited understanding about the behavioural impact of air quality forecasts. Our aim was to understand to what extent air quality warning systems influence protective behaviours in the general public, and to identify the demographic and psychosocial factors associated with adherence and non-adherence to the health advice accompanying these warnings. METHOD: In August 2016 literature was systematically reviewed to find studies assessing intended or actual adherence to health advice accompanying air quality warning systems, and encouraging people to reduce exposure to air pollution. Predictors of adherence to the health advice and/or self-reported reasons for adherence or non-adherence were also systematically reviewed. Studies were included only if they involved participants who were using or were aware of these warning systems. Studies investigating only protective behaviours due to subjective perception of bad air quality alone were excluded. The results were narratively synthesised and discussed within the COM-B theoretical framework. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included in the review: seventeen investigated actual adherence; three investigated intended adherence; one assessed both. Actual adherence to the advice to reduce or reschedule outdoor activities during poor air quality episodes ranged from 9.7% to 57% (Median = 31%), whereas adherence to a wider range of protective behaviours (e.g. avoiding busy roads, taking preventative medication) ranged from 17.7% to 98.1% (Median = 46%). Demographic factors did not consistently predict adherence. However, several psychosocial facilitators of adherence were identified. These include knowledge on where to check air quality indices, beliefs that one's symptoms were due to air pollution, perceived severity of air pollution, and receiving advice from health care professionals. Barriers to adherence included: lack of understanding of the indices, being exposed to health messages that reduced both concern about air pollution and perceived susceptibility, as well as perceived lack of self-efficacy/locus of control, reliance on sensory cues and lack of time. CONCLUSION: We found frequent suboptimal adherence rates to health advice accompanying air quality alerts. Several psychosocial facilitators and barriers of adherence were identified. To maximise their health effects, health advice needs to target these specific psychosocial factors.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/análise , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Poluição do Ar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA