Applying machine learning classifiers to automate quality assessment of paediatric dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC-) MRI data.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the performance of qualitative review (QR) for assessing dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC-) MRI data quality in paediatric normal brain and develop an automated alternative to QR. METHODS: 1027 signal-time courses were assessed by Reviewer 1 using QR. 243 were additionally assessed by Reviewer 2 and % disagreements and Cohen's κ (κ) were calculated. The signal drop-to-noise ratio (SDNR), root mean square error (RMSE), full width half maximum (FWHM) and percentage signal recovery (PSR) were calculated for the 1027 signal-time courses. Data quality thresholds for each measure were determined using QR results. The measures and QR results trained machine learning classifiers. Sensitivity, specificity, precision, classification error and area under the curve from a receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each threshold and classifier. RESULTS: Comparing reviewers gave 7% disagreements and κ = 0.83. Data quality thresholds of: 7.6 for SDNR; 0.019 for RMSE; 3 s and 19 s for FWHM; and 42.9 and 130.4% for PSR were produced. SDNR gave the best sensitivity, specificity, precision, classification error and area under the curve values of 0.86, 0.86, 0.93, 14.2% and 0.83. Random forest was the best machine learning classifier, giving sensitivity, specificity, precision, classification error and area under the curve of 0.94, 0.83, 0.93, 9.3% and 0.89. CONCLUSION: The reviewers showed good agreement. Machine learning classifiers trained on signal-time course measures and QR can assess quality. Combining multiple measures reduces misclassification. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A new automated quality control method was developed, which trained machine learning classifiers using QR results.

Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group.

Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24-48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials.

Response assessment in paediatric low-grade glioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group.

Paediatric low-grade gliomas (also known as pLGG) are the most common type of CNS tumours in children. In general, paediatric low-grade gliomas show clinical and biological features that are distinct from adult low-grade gliomas, and the developing paediatric brain is more susceptible to toxic late effects of the tumour and its treatment. Therefore, response assessment in children requires additional considerations compared with the adult Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. There are no standardised response criteria in paediatric clinical trials, which makes it more difficult to compare responses across studies. The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, clinicians, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address issues and unique challenges in assessing response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop consensus recommendations for response assessment in paediatric low-grade gliomas. Final recommendations were based on literature review, current practice, and expert opinion of working group members. Consensus recommendations include imaging response assessments, with additional guidelines for visual functional outcomes in patients with optic pathway tumours. As with previous consensus recommendations, these recommendations will need to be validated in prospective clinical trials.

Management of craniopharyngioma: the Liverpool experience following the introduction of the CCLG guidelines. Introducing a new risk assessment grading system.

PURPOSE: The Children's Cancer Leukaemia Group (CCLG) proposed a management pathway for craniopharyngioma that advocated limited surgery followed by upfront radiotherapy (RT) for large tumours with hypothalamic involvement and a radical resection only for smaller tumours without hypothalamic involvement. This strategy is not proven to provide optimum care or to be risk-free. The aim of this study is to review our experience of the management of craniopharyngioma diagnosed since the introduction of the CCLG guidelines in 2005. METHODS: All children diagnosed with craniopharyngioma at Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in the period between 1 January 2005 and 30 June 2011 were included. Management was based on the presence of hypothalamic syndrome, hydrocephalus, tumour size and radiological Paris grading system. Endoscopic drainage of tumour cyst was performed prior to formalising risk grade and surgical strategy. Definitive surgery was performed in 4-6 weeks time. In this respect, we developed a grading criteria. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Ten of the children underwent endoscopic cyst drainage prior to definitive surgery. The results of the subsequent surgical excision were complete resection, near total resection or subtotal resection in 30, 25 and 45 % patients, respectively. There was no surgical-related mortality and no new neurological deficits. Nine patients underwent RT at some stage. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we tried to develop an advanced model for the management of craniopharyngioma with a new risk grading system. This may have a direct impact on the surgical strategy and outcome and could be able to improve morbidity.