[Medical devices used in digestive system surgical procedures: What's the cost?] / Dépenses en dispositifs médicaux stériles dans certains actes de chirurgie hépatobiliaire et digestive : que resterait-il du Groupe Homogène de Séjour ?

OBJECTIVE: Medical devices innovations and associated procedures represent a large part of health facilities budget. The aim of this work was to evaluate the cost of medical devices used during different surgical procedures. This cost was compare with the revenue collected from hospital stay pricing. METHOD: A prospective analysis of the medical devices used in operating room was carried out for different types of programmed surgeries. For five weeks, references of sterile single-use medical devices used during the interventions were collected. RESULTS: Expenditure on medical devices used during surgical procedures represented 5.7 % of the hospitalization value for an inguinal hernia repair, 12 % for a cholecystectomy, 9.35 % for a colectomy, 14.5 % for a hepatectomy and 7 % for pancreatectomy, any severity index combined. The most important correlations existed between act duration and patient's level of severity and between operating times and consumables expenditure. CONCLUSION: Cost optimization opportunities are equivalence of some medical devices ranges, purchases with national groupings and potential decreases in operating times related to the use of innovative medical devices.

Assessment of high-priced systemic antifungal prescriptions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with international guidelines for costly antifungal prescriptions and to compare these results with a first study performed in 2007. METHODS: Retrospective study including all costly antifungal prescriptions made in surgical and medical intensive care units and in a hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and digestive surgery unit. Prescriptions were assessed in terms of indication, dosage, and antifungal de-escalation. RESULTS: Seventy-four treatments were analyzed. Treatments were prescribed for prophylactic (1%), empirical (22%), pre-emptive (16%), or targeted therapy (61%). Caspofungin accounted for 68% of prescriptions, followed by voriconazole (20%) and liposomal amphotericin B (12%). Indication was appropriate in 91%, debatable in 1%, and inappropriate in 8%. Dosage was appropriate in 69%, debatable in 8%, and inappropriate in 23%. Prescriptions were inappropriate for the following reasons: lack of dosage adjustment in light of the hepatic function (10 cases), underdosage or excessive dosage by>25% of the recommended dose in seven cases. De-escalation to fluconazole was implemented in 40% of patients presenting with a fluconazole-susceptible candidiasis. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of appropriate use was higher in 2012 compared with 2007 (62% and 37% respectively, P=0.004). Nevertheless, costly antifungal prescriptions need to be optimized in particular for empirical therapy, dosage adjustment, and potential de-escalation to fluconazole.