Exploring the values, preferences, and information needs of patients with NKX2-1-related disorders: A qualitative study protocol.

BACKGROUND: NKX2-1-related disorders have a prevalence of 1:500,000 and are therefore considered a rare condition according to the European Commission's definition. The European Reference Network of Rare Neurological Disorders is developing the first clinical practice guideline on the management of this condition, with the support of the Andalusian Health Technology Assessment Area, Endo-ERN, ERN-Lung and Imegen, within the framework of the ERNs Guidelines programme (DG SANTE/2018/B3/030). Within the scope of this programme, it becomes necessary to explore the patient perspective in order to include it in the ongoing clinical practice guideline and accompanying patient information booklet. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use qualitative methods to explore the values, preferences and information needs of patient with NKX2-1-related disorders and their caregivers. Participants will come from a variety of countries throughout Europe. One focus group and four semi-structured interviews will be conducted. Pairs will analyse the data using Grounded Theory. The Andalusian Regional Ministry of Health's Ethics Coordinating Committee for Biomedical Research (Sevilla, Andalucía, Spain) has approved this study protocol (29/03/2022). DISCUSSION: This is the first study to explore the values, preferences, and information needs of patients with NKX2-1-related disorders. The proposed study's findings will contribute to the generation of useful knowledge that will provide guidance to improve the care given to patients with the studied condition. While this study will provide valuable insights into the perspectives of patients with NKX2-1-related disorders, the findings are unlikely to be generalizable to patients with other conditions.

Informal care in Huntington's disease: Assessment of objective-subjective burden and its associated risk and protective factors.

BACKGROUND: Because of the genetic transmission of Huntington's disease (HD), informal caregivers (ICs, i.e., non-professional caregivers) might experience consecutive and/or concurrent caregiving roles to support several symptomatic relatives with HD over their life. Additionally, some ICs might be HD carriers. However, whether family burden of care is associated with specific factors in HD remains poorly studied. OBJECTIVE: To provide a quantitative view of the IC burden and identify associated factors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional assessment of home-dwelling symptomatic HD individuals (from REGISTRY and Bio-HD studies) and their primary adult ICs, including the HD individual's motor, cognitive, behavioral, functional Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale score; IC objective burden (quantification of IC time in activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living and supervision, using the Resource Utilization in Dementia instrument), IC subjective burden (Zarit Burden Inventory), and ICs' social economic functioning and use of professional home care. RESULTS: We included 80 ICs (mean [SD] age 57 [12.9] years, 60% women) in charge of 80 individuals with early to advanced stage HD (mean age 56 [12.6] years, 51% men). The mean hours of informal care time was high: 7.3 (7.9) h/day (range 0-24); the mean professional home care was 2.8 (2.8) h/day (range 0.1-12.3). This objective burden increased with higher functional loss of the HD individual and with more severe cognitive-behavioral disorders. The mean subjective burden (35.4 [17.8], range 4-73) showed a high level since the earliest stage of HD; it was associated with HD duration (mean 9.2 [4.7] years) and with aggressive symptoms in individuals (44% of cases). The burden was partially related to the multiplex caregiving status (19%). Protective factors lowering the IC burden included the absence of financial hardship (57%), a strong social network (16%) and keeping active on the job market outside home (46%). CONCLUSIONS: The objective-subjective burden of ICs related to changing patterns of neuro-psychiatric symptoms and mitigating environmental characteristics around the HD individual-caregiver dyads.

The burden of Huntington's disease: A prospective longitudinal study of patient/caregiver pairs.

BACKGROUND: Caregiver burden is widely recognized in Huntington's disease, but little is known about the factors determining its evolution over time in the absence of longitudinal studies. Our objective was to identify typical patterns of caregiver burden level and evolution using both patients' and caregivers' characteristics over a one-year period to identify potential levers for alleviation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter longitudinal study in caregiver/patient pairs in Huntington's disease (NCT02876445) between March 2011 and May 2015. Caregiver data were derived from two questionnaires at one-year interval on perceived burden (Zarit Burden Interview), social environment and support. Caregiver data were linked to clinical and demographic data from patients included in the Biomarker study (NCT01590589). Unsupervised clustering analysis was performed using self-organizing maps. RESULTS: 105 caregiver/patient pairs were included in the analysis. We identified four clusters. Of the two clusters of patients with advanced disease, cluster A was characterized by high levels of irritability and obsessive-compulsive behaviors, with high and increasing burden (N = 30; 29%), cluster B, the more apathetic group, with low and decreasing burden (N = 22; 21%). Clusters C (N = 27; 26%) and D (N = 26; 25%) were composed of patients in earlier stages, associated with a stable burden in group C but a notably increasing one in group D driven by patients' depression scores increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed the dynamics of caregiver burden over time in Huntington's disease, combining the stage of the disease, the severity of the patients' decline, psychiatric and behavioral disorders, and their evolution over time.

Improving language evaluation in neurological disorders: The French Core Assessment of Language Processing (CALAP).

Aphasia is a devastating brain disorder, detrimental for medical care and social interaction. The early diagnosis of language disorders and accurate identification of patient-specific deficits are crucial for patients' care, as aphasia rehabilitation is more effective when focused on patient-specific language deficits. We developed the Core Assessment of Language Processing (CALAP), a new scale combining screening and detailed evaluation to rapidly diagnose and identify patient-specific language deficits. This scale is based on a model of language processing distinguishing between the comprehension, production, and repetition modalities, and their different components: phonology (set of speech-sounds), morphology (how the sounds combine to form words), lexicon (words), syntax (how words combine to form sentences), and concept (semantic knowledge). This scale was validated by 189 participants who underwent the CALAP, and patients not unequivocally classified as without aphasia by a speech-language pathologist underwent the Boston Diagnosis Aphasia Evaluation as the gold standard. CALAP-screening classified patients with and without aphasia with a sensitivity of 1 and a specificity of 0.72, in 3.14 ± 1.23 min. CALAP-detailed evaluation specifically assessed the language components in 8.25 ± 5.1 min. Psychometric properties including concurrent validity, internal validity, internal consistency and interrater reliability showed that the CALAP is a valid and reliable scale. The CALAP provides an aphasia diagnosis along with the identification of patient-specific impairment making it possible to improve clinical follow up and deficit-based rehabilitation. It is a short and easy-to-use scale that can be scored and interpreted by clinicians nonexpert in language, in patients with fatigue and concentration deficits. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Reliability and factor structure of the Short Problem Behaviors Assessment for Huntington's disease (PBA-s) in the TRACK-HD and REGISTRY studies.

The authors report the inter-rater reliability and factor structure of the Short Problem Behaviors Assessment (PBA-s), a semistructured interview to measure severity and frequency of behavioral problems in Huntington's disease. Video recordings of 410 PBA-s interviews were rescored by an independent rater, and Cohen's kappa calculated to assess inter-rater reliability. The mean kappa was 0.74 for severity and 0.76 for frequency scores, whereas weighted kappa (allowing scores to differ by 1 point) was 0.94 for severity and 0.92 for frequency scores. The results of factor analysis were consistent with previous studies using other measures. The authors conclude that the PBA-s is a reliable measure.

Assessment of depression, anxiety and apathy in prodromal and early huntington disease.

The Functional Rating Scale Taskforce for pre-Huntington Disease (FuRST-pHD) is a multinational, multidisciplinary initiative with the goal of developing a data-driven, comprehensive, psychometrically sound, rating scale for assessing symptoms and functional ability in prodromal and early Huntington disease (HD) gene expansion carriers. The process involves input from numerous sources to identify relevant symptom domains, including HD individuals, caregivers, and experts from a variety of fields, as well as knowledge gained from the analysis of data from ongoing large-scale studies in HD using existing clinical scales. This is an iterative process in which an ongoing series of field tests in prodromal (prHD) and early HD individuals provides the team with data on which to make decisions regarding which questions should undergo further development or testing and which should be excluded. We report here the development and assessment of the first iteration of interview questions aimed to assess Depression, Anxiety and Apathy in prHD and early HD individuals.

Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease.

Assessment programs recently designed to follow-up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow-up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD.