Cost-effectiveness of boceprevir in patients previously treated for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The phase 3 trial, Serine Protease Inhibitor Boceprevir and PegIntron/Rebetol-2 (RESPOND-2), demonstrated that the addition of boceprevir (BOC) to peginterferon-ribavirin (PR) resulted in significantly higher rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) in previously treated patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype-1 infection as compared with PR alone. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of treatment with BOC in previously treated patients with chronic hepatitis C in the United States using treatment-related data from RESPOND-2 and PROVIDE studies. METHODS: We developed a Markov cohort model to project the burden of HCV disease, lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life-years associated with PR and two BOC-based therapies-response-guided therapy (BOC/RGT) and fixed-duration therapy for 48 weeks (BOC/PR48). We estimated treatment-related inputs (efficacy, adverse events, and discontinuations) from clinical trials and obtained disease progression rates, costs, and quality-of-life data from published studies. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for BOC-based regimens as studied in RESPOND-2, as well as by patient's prior response to treatment and the IL-28B genotype. RESULTS: BOC-based regimens were projected to reduce the lifetime incidence of liver-related complications by 43% to 53% in comparison with treatment with PR. The ICER of BOC/RGT in comparison with that of PR was $30,200, and the ICER of BOC/PR48 in comparison with that of BOC/RGT was $91,500. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000, the probabilities of BOC/RGT and BOC/PR48 being the preferred option were 0.74 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients previously treated for chronic HCV genotype-1 infection, BOC was projected to increase quality-adjusted life-years and reduce the lifetime incidence of liver complications. In addition, BOC-based therapies were projected to be cost-effective in comparison with PR alone at commonly used willingness-to-pay thresholds.

A global view of hepatitis C: physician knowledge, opinions, and perceived barriers to care.

UNLABELLED: Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Although recent advances in antiviral therapy have led to significant improvements in treatment response rates, only a minority of infected patients are treated. Multiple barriers may impede the delivery of HCV therapy. The aim of this study was to identify perceived barriers to care, knowledge, and opinions among a global sample of HCV treatment providers. An international, multidisciplinary survey of HCV treatment providers was conducted. Each physician responded to a series of 214 questions concerning his or her practice characteristics, opinions regarding the state of HCV care, knowledge regarding HCV treatment, and perception of treatment barriers. A total of 697 physicians from 29 countries completed the survey. Overall, physicians viewed patient-level barriers as most significant, including fear of side effects and concerns regarding treatment duration and cost. There were distinct regional variations, with Central and Eastern European physicians citing government barriers as most important. In Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa, payer-level barriers, including lack of treatment coverage, were prominent. Overall, the perception of barriers was strongly associated with physician knowledge, experience, and region of origin, with the fewest barriers reported by Nordic physicians and the most reported by Middle Eastern and African physicians. Globally, physicians demonstrated deficits in basic treatment principles, including the role of viral kinetics and the management of treatment nonresponders. Two thirds of surveyed physicians believed that patients do not have adequate access to providers in their community. CONCLUSION: Barriers to HCV treatment vary globally, though patient-level factors are viewed as most significant by treating physicians. Efforts to improve awareness, education, and specialist availability are needed.

Quality of care in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Medicare has proposed quality-of-care indicators for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The extent to which these standards are met in practice is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of health care that patients with HCV receive and the factors associated with receipt of quality care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide U.S. health insurance company research database. PARTICIPANTS: 10 385 patients with HCV enrolled in the database between 2003 and 2006. Patients were included if they were eligible for at least 1 quality indicator. MEASUREMENTS: Quality of HCV care received by patients, as measured by 7 explicit quality indicators included in Medicare's 2009 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. RESULTS: Proportions of patients meeting quality indicators varied, ranging from 21.5% for vaccination to 79% for the HCV genotype testing indicator. Overall, 18.5% of patients (95% CI, 18% to 19%) received all recommended care. Older age and presence of comorbid conditions were associated with lower quality, whereas elevated liver enzyme levels, cirrhosis, and HIV infection were associated with higher quality. Patients who saw both generalists and specialists received the best care (odds ratio of receiving care for which a patient is eligible: specialists alone, 0.79 [CI, 0.66 to 0.95]; primary care physician alone, 0.44 [CI, 0.40 to 0.48]). LIMITATIONS: The study had an observational retrospective design, used a convenience sample, and had no information on patient ethnicity. It may be that the indicators or the reporting of the indicators of HCV care--and not the care itself--is suboptimum. CONCLUSION: Health care quality, based on Medicare criteria, is suboptimum for HCV. Care that included both specialists and generalists is associated with the best quality. Our results support the development of specialist and primary care collaboration to improve the quality of HCV care. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Saint Louis University Liver Center.

Making it happen: managed care considerations in vanquishing hepatitis C.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an area of medical and economic concern. Studies show a substantial and increasing use of healthcare resources by patients with this disease. However, analysis of available data regarding virologic efficacy, impact on outcomes, and cost-effectiveness in chronic HCV infection appear to justify the initial costs for antiviral treatment, considering the future cost savings generated by prevention of liver disease. To further demonstrate cost-effectiveness, enhanced methods for identifying and treating patients are needed. Greater clinician awareness of available guidelines, patient education, close monitoring of antiviral therapy, emphasis on adherence to therapy, and management of adverse effects are recommended to ensure the best possible care for patients and to maximize outcomes.

Chronic hepatitis C: an age wave of disease burden.

There are at least 2.7 million individuals in the United States, most of them in their 40s and 50s, who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). As these infected individuals get older, about 20% will develop cirrhosis, and a significant fraction of those with cirrhosis (about 1 in 10) will then develop serious decompensated liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, HCV is the primary cause of death in 8000 to 12 000 people every year; the virus is also the primary reason for liver transplantation in the United States. Although the number of new cases of HCV infection has been dropping steadily since the introduction of improved blood-supply screening, the "age wave" of existing chronic HCV in baby boomers is expected to contribute to a substantial rise in morbidity, mortality, and costs over the next 2 decades. Although it is difficult to predict which HCV-infected patients will progress to serious liver disease, the availability of a combination drug regimen (peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin) that essentially "cures" the disease in more than half of treated patients now provides clinicians and pharmacists in managed care settings with the tools needed to diminish the impact of the anticipated wave of liver disease. This article reviews the epidemiology, natural history, clinical and economic burden, and screening and treatment options for HCV.

Treatment issues with chronic hepatitis C: special populations and pharmacy strategies.

Combination therapy with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin now eliminates detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) from the blood of more than half of patients with long-term infections. However, many of those infected with HCV have low rates of response to therapy and/or are more susceptible to drug side effects that limit adherence to therapy. African Americans with HCV, for example, tend to be more difficult to cure with drug therapy. Individuals coinfected with both human immunodeficiency virus and HCV are also more difficult to treat. As managed care organizations begin offering anti-HCV therapy to a broader range of patients, special strategies for limiting medication side effects and enhancing overall clinical and economic outcomes will become more important. In particular, assessing the early virologic response to therapy at 12 weeks can help clinicians identify patients who are highly likely to be responsive at the end of the full course, while also identifying likely nonresponders--who can be taken off therapy and thereby avoid unnecessary side effects and costs. In all patients remaining on therapy, efforts to boost adherence will also enhance the overall rate of sustained virologic response. Special attention should be paid to managing depression and cytopenias with patient education and either dose reduction or use of hematopoietic growth factors. These 2 basic treatment strategies--of stopping treatment early or, alternatively, of pressing for full patient compliance over the full course of therapy--are flip sides of the same management coin that health plans and clinicians can employ to optimize results and cost effectiveness with the current standard of therapy for chronic HCV infection.

Managing hepatitis C.

Availability of a drug regimen that eradicates the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in more than half of treated patients provides the medical community with a powerful new weapon to diminish the anticipated future wave of HCV-related liver disease and cancer. Clinicians must understand the benefits, risks, and costs associated with the combination of peginterferon alfa and ribavirin. Major clinical trials with this new standard of HCV therapy have demonstrated sustained virologic responses of 54% and 56% with 48 weeks of combination therapy. Response is highest in those with genotype 2/3, with early virologic response by week 12, in patients with high adherence, and in patients receiving weight-appropriate ribavirin dosages. The most common side effects are manageable and include fatigue, headache, myalgia, rigors, fever, nausea, insomnia, and depression. Neutropenia associated with interferon and anemia associated with ribavirin are more serious side effects that can cause discontinuation or dose reduction. Clinicians can maximize results and reduce costs with a regimen of peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin by choosing patients carefully, educating patients thoroughly, stopping therapy early in those patients who do not respond by week 12 of therapy, and enhancing adherence by managing side effects with appropriate dose reductions and/or selective use of antidepressants or hematopoietic colony stimulators.

Insurance, employment, and psychosocial consequences of a diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis in subjects without end organ damage.

OBJECTIVES: Asymptomatic individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) may experience difficulties in obtaining employment or insurance, despite their good health. The extent to which these difficulties occur is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the insurance, employment, and psychosocial consequences of a diagnosis of HH in subjects with no end organ damage. METHODS: In three outpatient clinics specializing in the treatment of HH, we performed a survey of individuals diagnosed with HH who were without end organ damage secondary to iron overload, along with their unaffected siblings. A review of the medical records of subjects with HH was performed. Main outcomes were attaining and keeping employment; health, disability and life insurance; and scores on the SF-36, a quality of life measure, and the SCL-90-R, a measure of psychological well-being. RESULTS: Of 130 eligible subjects with HH, 126 (97%) responded. Of the 55 eligible controls, 46 (84%) responded. Of the 126 subjects with HH, 25 (20%) described 28 incidents of insurance denial or increased premium rates, which they attributed to their diagnosis HH. Of the 28 incidents, 16 (57%) involved life insurance, eight (29%) involved health insurance, and four (14%) involved disability insurance. One subject reported an employment refusal. Five of the 25 subjects (20%) reporting insurance denial or increased premiums had significant comorbid conditions. One of 46 sibling controls (2%) reported an increased rate for life insurance (p = 0.003). No differences were noted in either the SF-36 or the SCL-90-R scores between subjects with HH and unaffected siblings. Overall rates of active health, disability, and life insurance were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance denial and increased premium rates are reported commonly among individuals with HH without end organ damage. However, the overall proportion of those with active insurance, the quality of life, and the psychological well-being of these subjects were similar to those of unaffected siblings.