Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 20(5): 699-706, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36646235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) is one of the most frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and is associated with delayed high degree atrioventricular (AV) block. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of AV block in such a population and to assess the performance and safety of a risk stratification algorithm on the basis of electrophysiology study (EPS) followed by implantation of a pacemaker or implantable loop recorder (ILR). METHODS: This was a prospective open-label study with 12-month follow-up. From June 8, 2015, to November 8, 2018, 183 TAVI recipients (mean age 82.3 ± 5.9 years) were included at 10 centers. New-onset LBBB after TAVI persisting for >24 hours was assessed by electrophysiology study during initial hospitalization. High-risk patients (His-ventricle interval ≥70 ms) were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker recording AV conduction disturbance episodes. Patients at lower risk were implanted with an ILR with automatic remote monitoring. RESULTS: A high-grade AV conduction disorder was identified in 56 patients (30.6%) at 12 months. Four subjects were symptomatic, all in the ILR group. No complications were associated with the stratification procedure. Patients with His-ventricle interval ≥70 ms displayed more high-grade AV conduction disorders (53.2% [25 of 47] vs 22.8% [31 of 136]; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, His-ventricle interval ≥70 ms was independently associated with the occurrence of a high-grade conduction disorder (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.8; P = .010). CONCLUSION: New-onset LBBB after TAVI was associated with high rates of high-grade AV conduction disturbances. The stratification algorithm provided safe and valuable aid to management decisions and reliable guidance on pacemaker implantation.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Bloqueio Atrioventricular , Marca-Passo Artificial , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio de Ramo/diagnóstico , Bloqueio de Ramo/epidemiologia , Bloqueio de Ramo/etiologia , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , Eletrocardiografia , Doença do Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Doença do Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/epidemiologia , Doença do Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/terapia , Bloqueio Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Bloqueio Atrioventricular/epidemiologia , Bloqueio Atrioventricular/etiologia , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 20(1): 157, 2020 04 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32248819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We studied the course of plasma concentrations of 4 cardiovascular biomarkers: natriuretic peptides (BNP, NT-proBNP; mid-regional (MR) pro-atrial NP); and soluble endothelial CD146 (sCD146), in patients with severe mitral valve stenosis undergoing percutaneous mitral commissurotomy (PMC) to identify potential markers of procedural success. METHODS: Biomarkers were tested in 40 patients the day before and the day after PMC. Success was defined as mitral valve area ≥ 1.5 cm2; or an increase of ≥0.5 cm2 in mitral valve area associated with echocardiographic mitral regurgitation

Assuntos
Fator Natriurético Atrial/sangue , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Estenose da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Antígeno CD146/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estenose da Valva Mitral/sangue , Estenose da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Paris , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA