Cross-sectional study of pediatric pain prevalence, assessment, and treatment at a Canadian tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Painful experiences are common among hospitalized children. Long-term negative biopsychosocial consequences of undertreated pain are recognized. AIMS: The study benchmarks pain prevalence, assessment, and treatment as first steps to improve pain care in a Canadian tertiary hospital. METHODS: Single-day audits were undertaken on the pediatric ward (PW), pediatric emergency department (ED), and maternal services (MS). Participants (child or caregiver proxy) reported hospital pain experiences in the preceding 24 h; medical records were reviewed for assessment and treatment. RESULTS: Among 84 participants, pain prevalence ranged from 75% to 88%; mean pain intensity ranged from 5.7 to 6.5/10. Prevalence of moderate to severe pain was 78% on PW, 65% in ED, and 55% on MS; needle pokes were the most frequent cause of worst pain. Documentation of pain assessment varied by setting (PW, 93%; ED, 13%; MS, 0%). Documented maximum pain scores were significantly lower compared to participant report (mean difference 4.5/10, SD 3.1, P < 0.0001). A total 29% (6/21) of infants with heel lance or injection received breastfeeding or sucrose, and 29% (7/24) of participants receiving other needle procedures had documented or reported topical lidocaine use. All participants on MS underwent needle procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is experienced commonly by infants and children in PW, ED, and MS. Pain assessment documentation is not routine and underestimates participant report. Evidence-based pain management strategies are underutilized. An institution-wide quality improvement approach is required to address pain care. Pain assessment and needle pain prevention and treatment should be prioritized in these pediatric acute care and newborn care settings.

Contexte: Les expériences douloureuses sont courantes chez les enfants hospitalisés. Les conséquences biopsychosociales négatives à long terme d'une douleur sous-traitée sont reconnues.Objectifs: L'étude compare la prévalence, l'évaluation et le traitement de la douleur comme premières étapes pour améliorer les soins de la douleur dans un hôpital tertiaire canadien.Méthodes: Des audits d'une journée ont été effectués dans les services de pédiatrie (SP), les services d'urgence pédiatrique (SU) et les services maternels (SM). Les participants (enfant ou soignant) ont rapporté des expériences de douleur à l'hôpital au cours des 24 heures précédentes; les dossiers médicaux ont été examinés pour évaluation et traitement.Résultats: Parmi les 84 participants, la prévalence de la douleur variait de 75 % à 88 % ; l'intensité moyenne de la douleur variait de 5,7 à 6,5/10. La prévalence de la douleur modérée à sévère était de 78 % pour les services de pédiatrie, 65 % pour les services d'urgence pédiatrique et 55 % pour les services maternels ; les piqûres étaient la cause la plus fréquente des pires douleurs. La documentation de l'évaluation de la douleur variait selon le contexte (SP 93 % ; SU 13 % ; SM 0 %). Les scores maximaux de douleur documentés étaient significativement inférieurs à ceux rapportés par les participants (différence moyenne 4,5 / 10, SD 3,1, P < 0,0001). Au total, 29 % (6/21) des nourrissons ayant reçu une piqûre au talon ou une injection ont reçu un allaitement ou du saccharose, et 29 % (7/24) des participants recevant d'autres procédures d'injection avaient documenté ou signalé une utilisation topique de lidocaïne. Tous les participants des services maternels ont subi une procédure impliquant une aiguille.Conclusions: La douleur est couramment ressentie par les nourrissons et les enfants dans les services de pédiatrie, les services d'urgence pédiatrique et les services maternels. La documentation relative à l'évaluation de la douleur n'est pas systématique et sous-estime la douleur rapportée par les participants. Les stratégies de prise en charge de la douleur fondées sur des données probantes sont sous-utilisées. Une approche d'amélioration de la qualité à l'échelle de l'établissement est nécessaire pour aborder les soins de la douleur. L'évaluation de la douleur et la prévention et le traitement de la douleur causée par les aiguilles devraient être prioritaires dans ces établissements de soins pédiatriques aigus et de soins aux nouveau-nés.

Accessing care in multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities continues to be a challenge in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities (MPTFs) are considered the optimal settings for the management of chronic pain (CP). This study aimed (1) to determine the distribution of MPTFs across Canada, (2) to document time to access and types of services, and (3) to compare the results to those obtained in 2005-2006. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the same MPTF definition as in 2005-2006-that is, a clinic staffed with professionals from a minimum of three different disciplines (including at least one medical specialty) and whose services were integrated within the facility. A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify existing MPTFs across Canada. Administrative leads at each MPTF were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their facilities. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 104 MPTFs (response rate 79.4%). Few changes were observed in the distribution of MPTFs across Canada compared with 12 years ago. Most (91.3%) are concentrated in large urban cities. Prince Edward Island and the Territories still lack MPTFs. The number of pediatric-only MPTFs has nearly doubled but remains small (n=9). The median wait time for a first appointment in publicly funded MPTFs is about the same as 12 years ago (5.5 vs 6 months). Small but positive changes were also observed. CONCLUSION: Accessibility to public MPTFs continues to be limited in Canada, resulting in lengthy wait times for a first appointment. Community-based MPTFs and virtual care initiatives to distribute pain services into regional and remote communities are needed to provide patients with CP with optimal care.

Evolution of a community-centred experiential learning module: A mixed-methods approach to promote social accountability and community partnership in undergraduate medical education.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background: Education in social determinants of health (SDH) has become an important part of medical curricula, facilitated increasingly through students' experiential learning with communities. The Community and Workplace Centred Learning Experience (CWCLE) module of the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, intends to integrate and extend second-year medical students' attitudes, skills, and knowledge about SDH and community resources. We aimed to: 1) Solicit students' self-evaluation of their ability to perform module learning objectives, 2) Assess module impact on student attitudes toward SDH, 3) Obtain feedback from community partners and students about their community experiences, and 4) Use feedback to collaboratively develop recommendations to enhance the CWCLE module. Methods: We used a mixed-method approach to combine quantitative data with stories and personal experiences. We developed an online survey for two cohorts of students who had completed the module, soliciting students to self-evaluate their perceived abilities to perform the module's learning objectives and evaluating students' attitudes towards SDH. We invited representatives from community agencies involved in the CWCLE module to participate in focus groups. We also held separate focus groups with students who participated in the online survey to elaborate on their survey comments. Results: In total, 145 students participated in the online survey (response rate=72.5%). Eleven community agency representatives and seven students participated in five focus groups. Our results demonstrate that medical students benefit from community-based experiential learning of SDH and community resources. We trace evaluations and discussions in the ongoing development of this community-based experiential learning module from its initial, primarily medical-school driven designs, towards a substantial involvement of community-based organizations in its operation and continuing redevelopment. Conclusions: Our mixed method offered us a better understanding of module impact and opportunities for improvement. This module evaluation and reform generated opportunities for community partners to influence decisions in medical education and led to a collaborative evolution of a community-centred learning experience. Medical schools should actively engage community partners in teaching behavioural and social components of the curriculum and acknowledge their partners' expertise to promote community engagement and social accountability in medical education.

Cost savings with transcutaneous screening versus total serum bilirubin measurement for newborn jaundice in hospital and community settings: a cost-minimization analysis.

BACKGROUND: Leading authorities in North America recommend universal screening via total serum bilirubin (TSB) measurement or transcutaneous bilirubinometry (TcB) for kernicterus prevention. We assessed costs associated with these 2 screening methods in hospital and in urban and rural community settings. METHODS: Our tertiary care centre in Saskatoon, with about 5600 births per year, serves the local population of 300 000; in addition, 30% of patients are referred from outside the local community and surrounding area. We obtained health administrative data for two 6-month periods: before (June 1 to Nov. 30, 2015 [TSB program]) and after (June 1 to Nov. 30, 2016 [TcB-TSB program]) implementation of universal screening with TcB. Data on nurses' time and mileage were collected to assess the mean time for screening and sample transportation. We performed a cost-minimization analysis. RESULTS: The observed requirement for TSB blood draws decreased by 71.4% after implementation of TcB (1383.2/1000 live births to 397.8/1000 live births), whereas the overall number of screens increased from 1383.2 to 2758.6/1000 live births. The mean time per screen decreased from 12.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.44-14.59) minutes with TSB to 2.94 (95% CI 2.55-3.33) minutes with TcB (p < 0.001). The estimated cost per TcB screen in hospital and community (urban and rural) settings was $3.54 and $3.76, respectively, and the estimated cost per TSB screen in hospital and in urban and rural community settings was $15.82, $50.21 and $65.03, respectively. The estimated overall 6-month savings with the TcB-TSB hospital and community programs were $19 760 and $6417, respectively. INTERPRETATION: The TcB-TSB program reduced nurses' time to screen and provided immediate results at the point of care. Transcutaneous bilirubinometry reduced the requirement for painful heel pokes while improving access to screening and decreasing the overall program cost.