Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of ultrasonographic cervical assessment with Bishop score before induction of labour in predicting the success of labour induction in nulliparous women. METHODS: This is a prospective study conducted in 138 women who underwent cervical assessment with transvaginal sonography followed by digital cervical assessment using Bishop score before induction of labour. Ultrasonographic parameters evaluated were cervical length, posterior cervical angle and funnelling were blinded to the managing physicians. Statistical analysis was carried out using Mann-Whitney test, chi2 test, receiver operating characteristics curves and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Induction of labour was successful in 106 (76.8%) of the women. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated cervical length and posterior cervical angle assessed by transvaginal sonography as independent predictors of successful outcome after induction of labour. Neither Bishop score nor its individual parameters were found to be significant in the regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for cervical length and posterior cervical angle was greater than that of the Bishop score in predicting a successful labour induction. The best cut-off point for the parameters in receiver operating characteristics curve was 3.0 cm for cervical length and 100 degrees for posterior cervical angle. Cervical length of 3.0 cm had a sensitivity of 84.9%, and a specificity of 90.6% and a posterior cervical angle of 100 degrees with 65% and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and posterior cervical angle is better than conventional Bishop score in predicting successful labour induction in nulliparous women.

Unsafe abortion: a neglected tragedy. Review from a tertiary care hospital in India.

AIM: With 16% of the world's population, India accounts for over 20% of the world's maternal deaths. The maternal mortality ratio, defined as the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births is incredibly high at 408 per 100 000 live births for the country. Abortion has been legalized in India for the past three decades. However, the share of unsafe abortion as a cause of maternal mortality continues to be alarming. The objective of the present study is to identify the magnitude of problem of unsafe abortion in India. METHODS: Emergency gynecologic admissions to a tertiary care center in North India over a 15-year period (1988-2002) were reviewed to evaluate the demographic and clinical profile of patients admitted as a result of unsafe abortion. The records were analyzed with regard to the age group, parity and marital status of the abortion seekers, the indication of abortion, the methods used, qualification of abortion providers, complications and fatality rate. RESULTS: The majority of women who were admitted with diagnosis of unsafe abortion were in the third decade of their lives. They were married, multiparous women living with their spouses. Sixty percent of the women had approached unqualified abortion providers who used primitive methods of pregnancy termination. All the women were admitted with serious complications of unsafe abortions and one-fourth of them succumbed to the complications. CONCLUSION: Unsafe abortion constitutes a major threat to the health and lives of women. This study highlights the need to focus more directly on the needs and preferences of women who seek abortion as well as on the accessibility of contraceptives and skills of the providers of abortion services, in order to improve the quality of abortion care.