RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection of intracranial hemangioblastoma poses technical challenges that may be difficult to impart to trainees. Here, we introduce knowledge of tool-tissue forces in Newton (N), observed during hemangioblastoma surgery. METHODS: Seven surgeons (2 groups: trainees and mentor), with mentor (n = 1) and trainees (n = 6, PGY 1-6 including clinical fellowship), participated in 6 intracranial hemangioblastoma surgeries. Using sensorized bipolar forceps, we evaluated tool-tissue force profiles of 5 predetermined surgical tasks: 1) dissection, 2) coagulation, 3) retracting, 4) pulling, and 5) manipulating. Force profile for each trial included force duration, average, maximum, minimum, range, standard deviation (SD), and correlation coefficient. Force errors including unsuccessful trial bleeding or incomplete were compared between surgeons and with successful trials. RESULTS: Force data from 718 trials were collected. The mean (standard deviation) of force used in all surgical tasks and across all surgical levels was 0.20 ± 0.17 N. The forces exerted by trainee surgeons were significantly lower than those of the mentor (0.15 vs. 0.24; P < 0.0001). A total of 18 (4.5%) trials were unsuccessful, 4 of them being unsuccessful trial-bleeding and the rest, unsuccessful trial-incomplete. The force in unsuccessful trial-bleeding was higher than successful trials (0.3 [0.09] vs. 0.17 [0.11]; P = 0.0401). Toward the end of surgery, higher force was observed (0.17 vs. 0.20; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The quantification of tool-tissue forces during hemangioblastoma surgery with feedback to the surgeon, could well enhance surgical training and allow avoidance of bleeding associated with high force error.
Assuntos
Hemangioblastoma , Cirurgiões , Competência Clínica , Retroalimentação , Bolsas de Estudo , Hemangioblastoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Instrumentos CirúrgicosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To develop and validate an automated assessment of surgical performance (AASP) system for objective and computerized assessment of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) as an integral part of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using console-feed videos recorded during live surgery. METHODS: Video recordings of 20 PLNDs were included. The quality of lymph node clearance was assessed based on the features derived from the computer vision process which include: the number and cleared area of the vessels/nerve (N-Vs); image median color map; and mean entropy (measures the level of disorganization) in the video frame. The automated scores were compared to the validated pelvic lymphadenectomy appropriateness and completion evaluation (PLACE) scoring rated by a panel of expert surgeons. Logistic regression analysis was employed to compare automated scores versus PLACE scores. RESULTS: Fourteen procedures were used to develop the AASP algorithm. A logistic regression model was trained and validated using the aforementioned features with 30% holdout cross-validation. The model was tested on the remaining six procedures, and the accuracy of predicting the expert-based PLACE scores was 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first automated surgical skill assessment tool that provides an objective evaluation of surgical performance with high accuracy compared to expert surgeons' assessment that can be extended to any endoscopic or robotic video-enabled surgical procedure.