The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the methodological quality of the systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) using A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2) and to explore the potential influencing factors. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. AMSTAR2 was used for evaluating the methodological quality of eligible SRs/MAs. Differences between methodological characteristics of SRs/MAs were compared using chi-square tests. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reviewer agreement in the pre-experiment. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify potential factors affecting methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 45 SRs/MAs were included. After AMSTAR2 evaluation, only two (4.4%) of 45 SRs/MAs were moderate, three (6.7%) were rated as low quality, and the remainder 40 (88.9%) were rated as critically low quality. Among the 16 items of AMSTAR2, item 3 and item 10 had the poorest adherence. Item 4 received the most significant number of "Partial Yes" responses. Univariable analysis indicated that there were significant differences in methodological quality in SRs between different continents (P = 0.027) as well as between preregistered SRs and those that were not (P = 0.004). However, in multivariate analysis, there was no significant association between methodological quality and the following research characteristics: publication year, continent, whether reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), preregistration, funding support, randomized controlled trials (RCT) enrollment, whether SR was published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and whether with meta-analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis based on interventional SRs/MAs showed that continent was independently associated with the methodological quality of SRs/MAs of CP/CPPS via univariable and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the methodological quality of SRs/MAs of CP/CPPS was generally poor. SRs/MAs of CP/CPPS should adopt the AMSTAR2 to enhance their methodological quality.

Quantitative assessment of gene promoter methylation in non-small cell lung cancer using methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting.

DNA methylation is closely associated with aberrant epigenetic changes. Previous studies have identified various genes associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the precise combination responsible for its etiology is still debated. The aim of the present study was to select a new set of NSCLC-related genes using methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting. The promoter methylation status of six selected genes, consisting of protocadherin γ subfamily B, 6 (PCDHGB6), homeobox A9 (HOXA9), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), microRNA (miR)-126, suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) and Ras association domain family member 5, also termed NORE1A, was evaluated in 54 NSCLC patients. From these samples, genome-wide DNA was extracted and bisulfite conversion was performed along with fluorogenic quantitative polymerase chain reaction to detect methylation values of the six selected promoters. The present results revealed frequent methylation on PCDHGB6, HOXA9 and miR-126, which contrasted with infrequent methylation on MGMT. The results indicated no methylation on either SOCS3 or NORE1A. The sensitivity and specificity of the methylation assessment were 85.2 and 81.5%, respectively, and the analysis results were validated by pyrosequencing. Furthermore, minute comparison of the association between DNA methylation and clinical features was performed. Overall, these results may provide potential information for the development of better clinical diagnostics and more targeted and effective therapies for NSCLC.