Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Nurs ; 28(19): 1256-1259, 2019 Oct 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31680572

RESUMO

Clinical surveillance provides essential data on changes in a patient's condition. The common method for performing this surveillance is the assessment of vital signs. Despite the importance of these signs, research has found that vital signs are not rigorously assessed in clinical practice. Respiratory rate, arguably the most important vital sign, is the most neglected. Poor understanding might contribute to nurses incorrectly valuing oxygen saturation more than respiratory rate. Nurses need to understand the importance of respiratory rate assessment as a vital sign and the benefits and limitations of pulse oximetry as a clinical tool. By better understanding pulse oximetry and respiratory rate assessment, nurses might be more inclined to conduct rigorous vital signs' assessment. Research is needed to understand why many nurses do not appreciate the importance of vital signs' monitoring.


Assuntos
Monitorização Fisiológica/enfermagem , Avaliação em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Oximetria/enfermagem , Taxa Respiratória , Humanos , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Sinais Vitais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA