Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237337, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32760125

RESUMO

Mobile phone use is increasing in Sub-Saharan Africa, spurring a growing focus on mobile phones as tools to increase agricultural yields and incomes on smallholder farms. However, the research to date on this topic is mixed, with studies finding both positive and neutral associations between phones and yields. In this paper we examine perceptions about the impacts of mobile phones on agricultural productivity, and the relationships between mobile phone use and agricultural yield. We do so by fitting multilevel statistical models to data from farmer-phone owners (n = 179) in 4 rural communities in Tanzania, controlling for site and demographic factors. Results show a positive association between mobile phone use for agricultural activities and reported maize yields. Further, many farmers report that mobile phone use increases agricultural profits (67% of respondents) and decreases the costs (50%) and time investments (47%) of farming. Our findings suggest that there are opportunities to target policy interventions at increasing phone use for agricultural activities in ways that facilitate access to timely, actionable information to support farmer decision making.


Assuntos
Uso do Telefone Celular/estatística & dados numéricos , Produção Agrícola/estatística & dados numéricos , Eficiência , Fazendeiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Fazendas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Uso do Telefone Celular/economia , Produção Agrícola/economia , Fazendas/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Invenções , Masculino , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Tanzânia , Zea mays
2.
Conserv Biol ; 28(6): 1645-56, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25039927

RESUMO

Biodiversity conservation has been criticized for undermining or ignoring social well-being. Currently efforts to mutually promote social justice, rural development, and biodiversity conservation, which have been contentious and yielded mixed results, continue to spread despite a general dearth of effective management strategies. We contend that social and economic concerns should be integral to conservation planning and propose that the scale of these phenomena is also critical. To evaluate the merit of this proposal, we adopted and expanded a conservation management strategy framework developed by Joel Heinen and examined how population density, economic disparity, and ethnic heterogeneity vary spatially surrounding 2 contrasting protected areas in East Africa: Kibale National Park in Uganda and Tarangire National Park in Tanzania. Analyses of demographic, wealth, and ethnicity data from regional censuses and household surveys conducted in 2009 and 2010 indicated that choice of scale (landscape or community) changed the management strategies recommended by the model. Therefore, "several small" people-park management strategies varying around a given protected area may be more appropriate than a "single large" people-park strategy applied across an entire protected area. Correspondingly, scale adjusted Heinen recommendations offered new strategies for effective conservation management within these human landscapes not incorporated in current in situ management plans.


Assuntos
Biodiversidade , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/métodos , Política Ambiental , Fatores Sociológicos , Ecossistema , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Densidade Demográfica , Justiça Social , Planejamento Social , Tanzânia , Uganda
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA