Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Urology ; 149: 98-102, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359487

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with simple nephrectomy at a safety net hospital with a diverse patient population and large catchment area. Simple nephrectomy is an underreported surgery. Performance of simple nephrectomy may represent a failure of management of underlying causes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of simple nephrectomies performed at a major urban safety net hospital from 2014 to 2019. Detailed demographic, surgical, and renal functional outcomes were abstracted. We assessed the medical and social factors leading to performance of simple nephrectomy and report contemporaneous perception of preventability of the simple nephrectomy by the surgeon. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients underwent simple nephrectomy during the study period; 55% were non-white, 77% were women, and the median age at time of surgery was 46 years. The most common medical factors contributing to simple nephrectomy were stone disease in 55.3%, followed by retained ureteral stent (30.6%) and stricture (30.6%). The most common social factors were lack of insurance (58.5%), substance abuse issues (32.3%), mental health issues (24.6%), and immigration status (18.5%). In 38.8% of cases, the provider felt the surgery was preventable if medical factors leading to simple nephrectomy were properly addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Simple nephrectomy is a common surgery in the safety net hospital setting. Both medical and sociologic factors can lead to simple nephrectomy, and awareness of these factors can lead efforts to mitigate them. This review has led to the implementation of strategies to minimize occurrences of retained stents in our patients.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Terciária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Humanos , Rim/fisiopatologia , Rim/cirurgia , Masculino , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/economia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/economia , Atenção Terciária à Saúde/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Spine Deform ; 8(3): 421-426, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32096128

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: To determine what clinical and operative factors influence inflation-adjusted hospital costs of posterior spine fusion surgery for AIS. With rising healthcare costs and the advent of bundled payments, it is essential understand the predictors of costs for surgical procedures. We sought to determine the components of hospital costs for AIS posterior spine fusion surgery using standardized, inflation-adjusted, line-item costs for services and procedures. METHODS: The study population comprised 148 AIS patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at a large tertiary care center between 2009 and 2016. Data on medical characteristics, curve type, curve magnitude, number of screws and the number of levels was collected through manual chart review of X-rays and medical records. Hospital costs from admission until discharge were retrieved from an institutional database that contained line-item details of all procedures and services billed during the hospital episode. Bottom-up microcosting valuation techniques were used to generate standardized inflation-adjusted estimates of costs and standard deviations in 2016 dollars. RESULTS: Mean cost of AIS surgery was $48,058 ± 9379. Physician fees averaged 15% of the total cost ($7045 ± 1732). Implant costs and surgical/anesthesia/surgeon's fees accounted for over 70% of the hospital costs. Mean number of screws was 16 ± 4.5, mean number of levels fused was 11.2 ± 2.2, and the mean implant density (screws per level fused) was 1.45 ± 0.35. On multivariate analysis, the number of screws per level fused, number of levels fused, curve magnitude and length of stay were all significantly associated with hospital costs (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Bundled payments for AIS surgery should include adjustments for number of levels fused and curve size. Areas for cost savings include further reduction in implant costs, shortening length of stay, and reducing intraoperative costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo/métodos , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Escoliose/economia , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Parafusos Ósseos/economia , Redução de Custos , Feminino , Humanos , Inflação , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA