Relationship of total hip arthroplasty outcomes to other orthopaedic procedures.

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 was used preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively to compare patients' self reported assessment of health and function between 151 patients who had primary total hip replacement and 49 patients who had total hip revision, 149 patients who had primary total knee replacements, 41 patients who had lumbar laminectomy, and 43 patients who had scoliosis surgery. Primary total hip arthroplasty and lumbar laminectomy posted equivalent followup scores. Primary total hip arthroplasty showed significant improvements in physical function and health perception when compared with revision total hip arthroplasty; all other health parameters were similar. Primary total hip arthroplasty showed significantly better followup scores and greater improvement in scores in four of nine categories of the SF-36 when compared with primary total knee arthroplasty (despite identical scores preoperatively). Despite a higher level of assessed health preoperatively, patients who had scoliosis surgery compared least favorably with patients who had primary total hip arthroplasty at 2 years followup. In terms of patient self assessment of health and function, primary total hip arthroplasty and lumbar laminectomy for radiculopathy gave the best results.

Health outcome assessment before and after lumbar laminectomy for radiculopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Forty-one patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy for radiculopathy resulting from herniated discs assessed their health status using a generic health outcome instrument (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36) before surgery and at an average of 2 years after surgery. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether lumbar laminectomy for herniated nucleus pulposus is a useful intervention when patients evaluate their own perception of health. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 has been used in multiple studies assessing various medical conditions. It is brief, generic, and reliable. Although surgical treatment for radiculopathy by lumbar laminectomy has been shown to be successful using specific criteria for patient selection and an algorithmic approach, the authors are not aware of any study using a patient-based health outcome assessment to evaluate the results of this type of surgery. METHODS: Forty-one patients (82% completed follow-up evaluation; average follow-up period, 2.08 years) completed Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 before and after surgery. Scores from before and after surgery were compared. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements (P < 0.01) were seen in eight of the nine health scores comparing scores from before and after surgery at follow-up evaluation. These included physical function, social function, role function resulting from physical limitations, role function resulting from emotional limitations, mental health, vitality, pain, and perceived health change. No significant change was seen in the patients' health perception after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the patients' self-reported health outcomes after lumbar laminectomy correlate with the excellent results previously seen using physician-driven outcome measures in an appropriately selected population with radiculopathy. The excellent results shown here did not deteriorate with age (> 40 years compared with < 40 years) or with complications after surgery.

Thoracolumbar infections in penetrating injuries to the spine.

A detailed review of the TJUH experience and the published literature on gunshot and stab wounds to the spine has been presented. The following statements are supported. (1) Military (high-velocity) gunshot wounds are distinct entities, and the management of these injuries cannot be carried over to civilian (low-velocity) handgun wounds. (2) Gunshot wounds with a resultant neurologic deficit are much more common than stab wounds and carry a worse prognosis. (3) Spinal infections are rare following a penetrating wound of the spine and a high index of suspicion is needed to detect them. (4) Extraspinal infections (septic complications) are much more common than spinal infections following a gunshot or stab wound to the spine. (5) Steroids are of no use in gunshot wounds to the spine. In fact, there was an increased incidence of spinal and extraspinal infections without a difference in neurologic outcome compared with those who did not receive steroids. (6) Spinal surgery is rarely indicated in the management of penetrating wounds of the spine. The recommendations for treatment at TJUH of victims of gunshot or stab wounds with a resultant neurologic deficit are as follows. (1) Spine surgery is indicated for progressive neurologic deficits and persistent cerebrospinal fluid leaks (particularly if meningitis is present), although these situations rarely occur. (2) Consider spine surgery for incomplete neurologic deficits with radiographic evidence of neural compression. Particularly in the cauda equina region, these surgeries may be technically demanding because of frequent dural violations and nerve root injuries/extrusions. These cases must be evaluated in an individual case-by-case manner. The neurologic outcomes of patients with incomplete neurologic deficits at TJUH who underwent acute spine surgery (usually for neural compression secondary to a bullet) were worse than the outcomes for the patients who did not have spine surgery. A selection bias against the patients undergoing spine surgery was likely present as these patients had evidence of ongoing neural compression. (3) A high index of suspicion is necessary to detect spinal and extraspinal infections. (4) Do not use glucorticoid steroids for gunshot wound victims. (5) Conservative (nonoperative) treatment with intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics and tetanus prophylaxis is the sole therapy indicated in the majority of patients who sustain a penetrating wound to the thoracic or lumbar spines.

Health outcome assessment before and after adult deformity surgery. A prospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-five patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity assessed their health status using a generic health outcome instrument before surgery and at an average of 2 years after surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether adult spinal deformity surgery is a useful intervention when patients evaluate their own perception of health. The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36, a validated generic health outcome assessment form, was used to measure patient's health status. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery for adult scoliosis is technically demanding. No study that we are aware of uses a generic health outcome instrument in a prospective manner to compare patients' perception of their health after adult scoliosis surgery. The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 has been validated in multiple studies assessing other medical conditions and was found to be reliable, comprehensive, brief, and generic. METHODS: Sixty-eight adult patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity were prospectively enrolled. Fifty-five patients were available to complete the Medical Outcomes Surgery Short Form-36 after surgery. The scores of the health profile were compared before and after surgery. The results of patients younger than 40 years were compared with those of patients older than 40 years. The results of patients younger than 40 years were compared with those of patients older than 40 years. The results of patients fused to more caudal end vertebral levels ((L4, L5)5) were compared with those who were fused to more cranial end vertebral levels. The results of patients without complications after surgery were compared with those of patients with complications after surgery. RESULTS: Average follow-up period was 22.5 months (minimum 12 months) in 82% of 68 patients. Statistically significant improvements were seen in postoperative scores for physical function, social function, bodily pain, and perceived health change. We found no significant differences in self-reported health function parameters related to age ( > 40 vs. < 40), end vertebral level of fusion, or presence of complications after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a generic health outcome instrument to adult spinal deformity surgery shows that adult scoliosis surgery significantly improves patient self-reported health assessment and function. Beneficial results do not appear to deteriorate with age or more caudal end vertebral levels of fusion. Future studies combining disease-specific outcomes analysis and generic health surveys to assess end results of adult spinal deformity surgery will be useful.

Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment.

We used computerized tomographic scans and subsequent dissections to evaluate the position of ninety pedicle screws that had been inserted bilaterally into the fourth through twelfth thoracic vertebrae of five fresh-frozen cadavera. The screws had been inserted by five experienced spine surgeons without the use of radiographs or imaging studies. Of the ninety screws, thirty-seven were found to have penetrated the cortex of the pedicle. Twenty-one screws had penetrated the medial cortex and entered the spinal canal, and sixteen had penetrated the lateral cortex. The aorta and the esophagus were at greatest risk for injury after advancement of the screws beyond the anterior vertebral cortex. Computerized tomographic scans of the thoracic spine in nineteen living controls who did not have a spinal abnormality confirmed the proximity of the posterior mediastinal structures to the misplaced screws.